Select Page

From Crisis to Care: Strengthening Mental Health in the Workplace with Jessi Beyer

From Crisis to Care: Strengthening Mental Health in the Workplace with Jessi Beyer

LISTEN TO THE EPISODE: 

ABOUT THE EPISODE

Join us for a powerful episode exploring mental health in the workplace and practical support strategies with crisis mental health expert Jessi Beyer. In this compelling conversation, Jessi unpacks the realities of mental health challenges, particularly in high-risk and safety-critical environments. Backed by eye-opening statistics and real-world stories, she explains how these challenges directly impact performance, culture, and overall workplace safety. Jessi emphasizes the importance of building a true culture of care grounded in trust, psychological safety, and meaningful peer support. She also introduces her impactful L.I.F.E. framework for suicide prevention, offering clear, practical guidance to help leaders and teams take meaningful steps toward prevention. If you are ready to move your workplace from crisis response to proactive care, this episode delivers practical strategies to strengthen mental health and ensure every team member feels seen, supported, and valued. Tune in. This is a conversation that truly matters!

READ THE EPISODE

Real leaders leave a legacy. They capture the hearts and minds of their teams. Their origin story puts the safety and well-being of their people first. Great companies ubiquitously have safe, yet productive operations. For those companies, safety is an investment, not a cost for the C-suite. It’s a real topic of daily focus. This is the Safety Guru with your host, Eric Michrowski, a globally recognized ops and safety guru, public speaker and author. Are you ready to leave a safety legacy? Your legacy success story begins now.

Hi, and welcome to the Safety Guru. Today, I’m very excited to have with me Jessi Beyer. She’s a crisis mental health professional. Jessi, welcome to the show. Very excited to have you with me today.

Thank you so much for having me. I’m excited to be here as well.

Let’s get started with how you got started in this space and really your passion, your motivation around it. Then we’ll get into why it’s so important.

Absolutely. So, my story started when I was 16, and my boyfriend at the time attempted suicide. He had texted me. He said, Hey, tonight’s the night. Can you come over and say goodbye? And I was like, well, I can come over and bring 911 with me. I can definitely do that. And so, I ended up calling law enforcement, calling 911. Law enforcement showed up, and he was safe. He was taken to the hospital. That story ends well. But the reason I bring this up is because there was a social worker that showed up with law enforcement. So, once they had made sure scene was safe and everything. She came in, she spoke to him for a little bit, and she handed me her card. And she told me, she’s like, hey, if you ever need anything, if you have a hard night, you can always give me a call. Understandably, that night was incredibly difficult for me. I mean, that was a teenager trying to handle life and death in a very real, very emergent way. And her card and her presence was just this little bright spot in the night for me. I did what any good 16-year-old does.

I took her business card, and I promptly I put it in the top bathroom drawer of my bathroom, and I never looked at it again. But what that card did and what that moment did was it planted this seed for me of, that was cool. I went to school, I studied psychology, undergrad, grad school. I found myself really drawn to the trauma and crisis side of the world as opposed to the private practice side of the world. I’ve always been that way. I was an EMT for a little bit. I worked in search and rescue for a little bit. I’ve always been drawn to more of those short-term interventions, a little bit of adrenaline, a little bit of crisis. That’s where I thrive. And as I was graduating grad school, I got this call from an organization that was like, hey, we’re standing up an infield crisis intervention program, and we want you to be our first, our first clinician. And I was like, oh, my gosh, I’d love to, because it was a thought in the back of my head of like, wow, wouldn’t it be cool if I could, blah, blah, blah?

But I didn’t really think it existed. And so, when they called me, I was like, I would love to. And I just had this full circle moment back to that business card in my bathroom drawer of, wow, this is funny how life turns out this way. So that’s my story. I’ve been working in this program for the past almost three years, which is really exciting to see it grow over those past couple of years. And it all started with a really, really, really terrible night in high school and a co-responder’s business card.

Wow, what a powerful story in terms of how you got started in the connection in life. We’re mostly talking to safety executives, leaders. This is a topic that’s sometimes not talked enough in the safety space. Huge levels of connections with safety. Sometimes mental health is passed on to a responsibility that belongs to HR versus safety, has to handle the safety events. Let’s start with a little bit about the stats. Why is it so important for organizations to be aware of mental health, suicide prevention, all those themes?

Mental health is something in the workplace that I think a lot of people, especially in the safety liability risk management side of things, they think it happens over there. It’s something that happens in homes, in parking lots, on sidewalks, but not in the workplace. Because when you’re working, you’re working, and you’re here to work, and you’re here to be professional, and you’re here to do all those things.

Wouldn’t that be simple? 

Wouldn’t that be so nice? I think if we actually sat down with ourselves, we would recognize that that’s not the case. It doesn’t quite work that cleanly. But a lot of people are like, well, I can focus on physical risk. I can make sure there’s no hazardous chemicals spilled everywhere. I can make sure that there’s barriers, so people don’t fall off of things. You can probably tell that I’m not a physical safety expert because I don’t know what those things look like. But people talk about those things. But what they don’t recognize is that how someone is in their own head is how they also show up at work. So, a few stats to put to this. Approximately 4% of Americans consider suicide annually. And this is a It’s an actual serious consideration, not just a fleeting thought, intrusive thought type of thing. Which means that if you’re running an organization of 100 people, you’ve had four folks that came close to dying in the last year. If you’re running an organization of a thousand people, you’ve had 40. That’s a lot of humans that are really, really struggling. When someone is having a mental health concern to the level of thinking, Maybe I should die, that’s going to affect how they show up in the workplace.

Another stat that is somewhat interesting related to this is that in the US, the cost of mental illness in the workplace to employers is over 500 billion per year. This is in absenteeism, this is in loss of productivity, this is in terms of health care cost, and this is in terms of lost life potential from premature death because of suicide or depression. I bring these stats up not to say that, oh, my gosh, we only care about it because it costs us money, but to show that this is not some little, tiny thing that a few people across the country struggle with. This is something that everyday humans, every day, bring into the workplace. And that’s why it’s so important that safety managers, risk management liability, understand that because their people are struggling. I was talking to a potential client one time, and I just cold-pitched him on LinkedIn like we do. And he responded, and he’s like, well, we don’t have any mental health concerns in our organization. And I was like, okay, you have 500 people. I didn’t say this. I did not this. This was just in my head. I was like, you have 500 people on your team.

Your people are probably struggling more than you know if you’re the type of leader that thinks that they’re not struggling at all in a team of 500 people. So, food for thought for folks that are running organizations of any size, but especially organizations where those 4% statistics are going to stack up into meaningful numbers of humans. It means it’s a challenge in your workplace, even if you don’t think it is.

One thing I would add as well is if you think about what you just You mentioned the 4% considers suicide every year, a lot of safety requires a team member to have focus on task, to have attention on the work they’re doing, to be looking at risks, mitigating those risks in the work environment. If you’re not well, you’re not there in the moment present assessing all these pieces, your awareness of the risk in front of you may dramatically change.

Absolutely. It absolutely could. And that’s something where we start to see not necessarily deaths in the workplace, but accidents in the workplace that could have been prevented. If we think about this at a super, super basic level, depression as a mental illness slows everything down. Anxiety as a mental illness speeds everything up. So, if you think of a time in your life where you’ve been super anxious about something, maybe not to a clinical level, but even just in-laws are coming over, right? And you’re like, oh, my God, we got to clean the house. We got to do this. We got to do that. All these things are going on. You get a little bit You’re physically shaking a little bit, and maybe you spin around in the kitchen too quickly and knock a cup off the counter. This is a very, very mundane example, but now extrapolate that to a high-risk workplace. You spin around and knock a chemical off the counter because you’re anxious and you’re panicked about this and you’re thinking about this, and maybe it does rise to a clinical level. That’s not good from a physical safety and risk management perspective.

Conversely, on the depression side of things, everything’s slower. It’s harder to do things, to have the motivation to do things. And so now we’re moving through the workplace in a fog. We’re thinking that we’re not connecting with our coworkers. We’re not having those… I’m putting unnecessary in quotes because it’s like, what conversations can I take off my plate to reduce mental load? But we’re not having those conversations with colleagues about, hey, did you do this? Did you check this? Let me double check this. Again, that’s where we start to see these accidents in the workplace. I’m, of course, not saying that every accident in the workplace is caused by mental illness. That’s way too much of a stretch. But those types of concerns of mental health challenges of depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, those can have very real translations into increased accidents in the workplace.

Are there some sectors that introduce more risks? Because one of the things that I’ve historically heard is a lot of the fly-in/fly-out type of operation where there isn’t necessarily stability in the home environment because you’re gone for potentially a week or two weeks at a time, more at risk. Certain types of professions, like construction where you could be on the road for extensive periods of time, also increase the risk? Are there some other industries like that that would have maybe a higher risk around suicide or mental health challenges?

Absolutely. This is such a good question. And to answer this fully, I’m going to zoom out and look at this from a societal lens. So, yes, certain professions are definitely at a higher risk. Broadly speaking, your high trauma careers, so your military first responder types, those are going to have higher rates of mental health challenges, specifically suicide, as well as a lot of your more blue-collar type professions. So, construction is consistently at the top of that list of professions that have high risk of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts and suicide deaths, everything on that spectrum, as well as a lot of your food type industries, your agriculture, your forestry. A lot of those blue collar, traditionally lower wage professions are the ones that have high suicide rates. On the other end of that spectrum, your finance, your business, things like that, they have generally a bit lower suicide rates. And when I’m referencing higher and lower, it’s in reference to the national average. Sure, exactly. So, the national average is measured as per 100,000 people, higher or lower than that. It’s what we’re talking about here. And there’s some different professions that are weighted by genders.

So, it’s like, male of this profession has a higher suicide rate than female of the… Things like that. But in general, those are the trends. And if we zoom out and look at why, you started hinting that. But in order to have a full happy, healthy life, in order to be a fully healthy human, we look at not just what is your physical health or even what is your mental health, but we look at social determinants of health. We look at your social relationships. We look at your financial stability. We look at your ability to keep a roof over your head. We look at all of these different things. And it’s interesting because I took a class recently on suicide forensic autopsies, which is basically the practice of if someone passes away, likely suicide, doing an investigation into the few months before their death to learn about what is contributed to that death and how organizations or families or societies can change things to prevent similar deaths in the future. Really, really interesting. But we spent six hours talking about all the different risk factors for suicide. And if I had to sum it up in one sentence, the one sentence would be, the worse your life is, the more likely you are to consider suicide.

And so, in a lot of these professions, we see things Exactly like you were talking about. Inconsistent social relationships because you’re constantly changing crews, changing jobs, moving here, moving there. We see some financial instability. You have periods of I’m working a ton. There’s a ton of construction. Oh, God, I can’t find a job. Now I’m on unemployment. Now I’m worried about how I’m going to pay my bills. I’m getting food from the local organizations that are giving it away instead of being able to buy it. Maybe I can’t pay my rent. Maybe I start to cope with those things by using substances more than I should. It’s all connected with how these things turn into a downward spiral. And then if you look at someone’s life and you see homelessness and you see addiction and you see maybe strained relationships in the marriage because they’re stressed about work, all of these things compile into what could be a suicide attempt or self-alternation or depression or anxiety or all these different things. And so, it’s more than just saying, Oh, shame on you. You work construction. It automatically means you have a higher likelihood of dying by suicide.

But it actually means, hey, these professions come with certain social and societal risks, and all of those things together correlate into higher suicide risks. And the last thing I’ll say is that for those of you that are listening that work in safety, recognize that the professions that I just named are often the ones with robust internal safety departments because of the physical risks as well.

Correct. That’s exactly where I was going to go.

Yeah, exactly. Take it away, Eric. But yeah, that was the point I wanted to make there.

No, I think it’s a great observation because the industries you mentioned are the industries that typically have higher physical risk. It’s not the accountant; it’s not the lawyers that typically are going to have a serious injury. It can obviously happen. But those are the industries that have more robust safety cultures, generally more risk awareness. But not necessarily addressing the full spectrum of the mental health element.

Yeah, absolutely. I think that that’s an opportunity for change. Risk is a whole human. Social determinants of health, it’s a whole human. How do you take care of your whole people. It’s not just the physical risk. It’s not just, hey, let’s make sure someone doesn’t accidentally chainsaw their leg off. But it’s also, how do we make sure that they are taken care of on the inside as well? Cool.

Maybe let’s talk about some of the existing interventions that we see in many organizations. Let’s look at some of the challenges or shortfalls to be aware of with them.

Absolutely. I want to start by saying that any organization that is doing anything at all to address employee mental health deserves a round of applause. This is by no means a critique on, well, shame on you, you’re not doing enough. This is just an evaluation of how some of these things work. One of the most common ones is what’s called an EAP, so an Employee Assistance Program. And it is, broadly speaking, there’s different formats, but it is a hotline or a website that you can access that provides short term resources for different things. So, you can get a couple financial counseling sessions. You can get a couple mental health therapy sessions. They can refer you to some other resources Some EAPs will have monthly trainings. We recently had one on buying your first home, so how to navigate that whole process. So, it’s like a miniature two one, a miniature location where people can go and get resources for things that they’re struggling with. But the challenge with EAPs is, well, actually a couple of different things. But one, their employer provided, and so confidentiality is a concern. EAPs are in theory confidential. They should not be telling your employer that, oh, they took financial counseling from us, or, oh, they took mental health counseling from us.

But there’s always that concern, especially in organizations or professions where there’s a culture of, I’m strong, I don’t need it, or maybe even the very real risk of, if my supervisors find out that I’m struggling with my mental health, they’ll bench me, they’ll fire me, they’ll demote me. All of those things in certain professions are very real risks, unfortunately. And so, there’s that concern of, okay, well, I’m calling this number that my employer gave me. I don’t want this getting back to I don’t want this getting back to them in any fashion. So, there’s that concern related to confidentiality. But there’s also the concern about a true connection to the resource that’s being provided. Three therapy sessions, great. Love it. Any person getting in the door of therapy is amazing. But in order to really have positive impacts from mental health counseling, you need that strong therapeutic relationship with the person that you’re providing. With an EAP, it’s usually very short-lived, and there’s usually not a huge variety of providers or even the opportunity to choose which provider that you’re working with. I’m sure there’s an EAP out there that’s going to comment on this and be like, well, we can do that, and that’s amazing.

But for the vast majority of them, it’s a pretty limited system. And research has consistently shown that the quality of the therapeutic relationship is even more important when it comes to positive outcomes from therapy than the modality of therapy or the clinical skill of the provider. So, this isn’t just, oh, it’s nice to like your therapist. It’s there are actually measurable clinical outcomes from having a positive relationship with your therapist. And then EAP simply doesn’t provide that for most people. So better than nothing, but also something to consider that, hey, maybe this isn’t doing quite what we think it is, and we can’t just check the box of, Good. Mental health’s solved. We have an AP. The other resource that I see a lot are flyers for the crisis line. So, the National Suicide Prevention Crisis Line is 988. It works just like 911. It’s a 24/7 free resource that you can call. It is completely confidential. All of their clinicians are bound by HIPAA. So, it’s not something that me, as your employer, could call and say, hey, has Eric called 988 lately? They’d play down and be like, I don’t know who Eric is.

I’ve literally never heard him in my life. I know this because I’ve had to handle some of those calls. Yeah, no, it’s a really, really phenomenal resource, and I absolutely love it. The challenge with 988 is that it is a reactive resource. So, it requires the person in crisis to say, I’m in crisis. I’m going to reach out for this resource. And as we just talked about in a lot of these professions, there’s that culture of, I’m okay, I’m okay, I’m okay, I don’t need help. What we really need instead is, yes, we need an EAP. Yes, we need to refer people to the crisis line. But we need to go upstream a little bit more and look at how do we turn our organization into a culture of care within itself, where I can look at you and say, hey, I’m noticing something. You’ve been late, you’ve knocked over a few things, you just look sad. Maybe don’t say it like that, but you’re recognizing some of these things and saying, hey, are you okay? I’m going to check in with you. And not only do I have this skill to recognize when you might need a check in, but I have this skill to know how to handle that check in and what to say, how to have that conversation and where to send you afterwards, which is where we talk about EAP-988. 

But we need to come a little bit further earlier in the system than that to really get people before it turns into a crisis.

Great observations on that one. Another thing on the EAPs that I’ve often heard from frontline team members is I’m calling somebody on a phone that’s obviously in an office in a big city who has no understanding of the work that I do, and they’re struggling to connect with me and my specific challenges. That element also changes because if you speak to a lot of… In the aviation space as an example, often they’ll have something that’s more in tune with what you’re talking about, where you’re talking to somebody who understands the space. Maybe they were a pilot before they understand the environment. And so, it becomes, I’m talking to somebody who gets me, which also helps.

It helps so much. Yeah. And here’s another plug for the 988 Crisis Lines. They do have some specialized options out there for certain professions. So, there’s hotline specifically for first responders. There’s hotline specifically for military service members. In Washington, where I live, there’s a hotline specifically for members of indigenous communities, where it’s staffed entirely by folks of indigenous backgrounds. I don’t know about hot lines for construction or things like that, but there are definitely hot lines for medical professions. There’s a hotline specifically for sexual assault survivors. All of these ways of crunching down the community into these are a group of people that can understand what I’m going through. That’s phenomenal. And so, I love those unique crisis lines that are out there for things like that.

This episode of the Safety Guru podcast is brought to you by Propulo Consulting, the leading safety and safety culture advisory firm. Whether you are looking to assess your safety culture, develop strategies to level up your safety performance, introduce human performance capabilities, re-energize your BBS program, enhance supervisory safety capabilities or introduce unique safety leadership training and talent solutions, Propulo has you covered. Visit us at propulo.com.

You touched on this element of culture of care, and I’d love you to double click a little bit more on that in terms of what is this culture that you’re trying to build? How would you go about it? Because it sounds simple in many ways, but it’s not as simple as to say, Are you okay? Tell me a little bit more.

Absolutely. It’s simple, but it’s not easy. I’ll say that. It’s not a complex process, but it does take buy-in and time and training in order to make something like that happen. When I say culture of care, what I mean is that most employees, especially if you’re working overtime, especially if you’re working shift work, you end up spending more time with your coworkers than you likely do with your family at home over the course of your working years. And so, what that means is that hopefully you have some pretty strong relationships with the people at work, though not always. But it also means that they are going to be the ones that notice some of these signs and symptoms if they are trained to before your family might or before you yourself It’s another touch point. It’s another opportunity to reach out and connect with someone before whatever they’re struggling with turns into a crisis. And so that’s what I’m talking about with the culture of care is how do we build that entity to where it’s not, I come in, I clock in, I do my work, I go home. But it’s, I come in, I clock in, I see Eric crying in the corner, I check in with Eric, and I see how Eric’s doing, and I connect Eric to a better resource.

That’s what we’re trying to build, is how do we take care of each other? And it’s not It’s not just, oh, I am the HR person, so therefore, I am now the person that everyone comes to. That’s great, but that’s a huge load on you for one person to try to manage the mental health of the entire organization. It’s how do we get all of us to do that? It’s not one person for everyone. It’s one person for one person. And so that person has someone for them. And it’s this spider web that we’re trying to connect people in. And so, what I really tell people and what I teach people is what I’ve designed as my life model of prevention. And it’s an acronym, L-I-F-E. And I will tell you, I spent entirely too much time trying to come up with a relevant acronym for this.

So please be- But it’s a good acronym.

A lot of work that went into that. But our life model here. So, our life model is four steps, and I’ll high level it. Eric, we can break it down if you have specific questions there. But this is really everything that I learned in grad school, everything that I do in the field, condensed into four simple steps that anyone can use to interact with someone in crisis. The L of this model is listened. And bear with me, because people who hear active listening usually are like, oh, for the love of God, please not again. We don’t need more fluffy stuff. Or they’re like, okay, this is really cool. And I will tell you, in my current job, I do crisis work. I’m in the field. I’m also a negotiator on our SWAT team. And the whole skillset that we use when it comes to diffusing those really, really high-risk situations and convincing someone to walk out of the house and get arrested is active listening. Sure. So, this is not fluffy. This is not, oh, show them you care. This is very tactical. Here’s how to phrase this sentence when they say this.

That’s how much we’re breaking it down in the L of that life model. Our I, F, and E of the life model, those are specifically to someone who might be considering suicide. So, we do all the active listening. We understand their story. They feel really heard and understood and validated. And then we move into the I, which is inquire. This is where we ask if someone is considering suicide, and we do it very calmly, very directly. No wiggling around it because we’re uncomfortable about saying the word. This is also the place where if they say yes, we do a very, very basic risk assessment to understand if this is a, I can handle this situation, or an, oh, my God, I need to call 911 situation. Very, very basic risk assessment there. Sure. In our F of the life model, this is forming a safety plan. So historically, 10, 20 years ago, we used safety contracts, which is essentially if I was feeling suicidal and Eric was my therapist, we would both sign a literal contract, like a piece of paper that said that I would not kill myself. And understandably, that really didn’t work super well.

And we unfortunately had to lose a lot of people to recognize that me living out of obligation to a piece of paper that I signed with Eric is not fantastic. And so, what we have now are safety plans. Safety plans are a collection of resources that a person in crisis can use the next time that they’re in crisis in order to get them over that hump of the crisis into a longer term resource, whether that’s making it to their therapist appointment in a couple of days, whether it’s waiting until there’s a bed available at inpatient, whatever that is. So, there’s actually things that they can do, people they can connect with and resources that they can engage with on that safety plan. The last step of our life model, the E, this is eliminating lethal means. Lethal means is just the fancy term for what they’re going to use to try to kill themselves with. And so, we’re not trying to do perfect lethal means restriction and take away every single possible thing that someone could use to end their life. But we’re trying to pull away some of the big ones and create time and distance between when they’re having that suicidal thought and when they could act on it. 

This ties in well with the safety plan because most suicidal crises, really, really acute, I’m going to go jump off the building type of suicidal crises, are actually quite short. It’s a couple minutes to maybe a day or two is when those really, really, really acute crises last. And so, we with the safety plan and with the lethal means restriction, we’re trying to see if we can keep them away from that method long enough for that crisis to pass. So, to give a concrete example of this, if someone is considering using a firearm to end their life, and the firearms is loaded safety off in their unlocked nightstand drawer, all they have to do is open a drawer and pull a trigger if they’re in a crisis. But if the ammo was completely removed from the house and the gun is in the safe in the basement, and only their partner has the code to that, then they would have this thought about ending their life. They’d have to call their partner, get the code, get the gun out of the basement, put on pants, drive to the store, buy ammo, drive back home, and then pull the trigger.

And with all of that time, that gives it space for that person to metabolize the crisis, and hopefully for their partner to step in and say, hey, honey, why do you need the gun safe code? So, there’s opportunities there for that path to reverse. And that’s what we’re trying to do with lethal means restriction. So, all of these things, it can sound complicated. It can sound overwhelming when I’m saying this right now. And I’m not trying to turn anyone into a therapist. If you’re feeling like this is too much for you to handle, sit down with the person and just listen. Forget the I, the F, and the E. Call 911, call their therapist. Call the crisis line. That’s what they are trained to do day in and day out. But if you can do the listening really, really well, if you can inquire well, confidently and calmly, and you can connect them to resources and distance them from what they’re thinking of using, you’re phenomenal. That’s amazing. You probably just save that person’s life. And so those are the skills that I’m trying to instill in these communities and in these organizations, especially those that, like we talked about previously, statistically have that higher likelihood of having folks die by suicide.

Sure. And fairly straightforward in terms of the steps. What I liked about when you talked about culture of care, and safety is also this reference of actively caring. Really, if I know your baseline, if I get to know how you are every day, then I can also spot when somebody’s a little bit off, different, something’s bothering them at that point in time as well. It connects very, very nicely to what you’re talking about on the life side in terms of the life model. Tell me a little bit more about how you go about it in organizations because you obviously are trying to train lots of people in work environment, not some HR person far away, but different people in the work environment. How do you go about doing it? What has worked well in terms of those interventions?

Absolutely. I just want to comment really quickly on what you said previously just this moment ago, because I think that this culture of care is not just, hey, let’s proactively take care of each other, but it also informs how we reactively respond to problems. If someone is having more physical accidents, they’re knocking over more stuff. I just keep coming back to that example, but it’s an easy one to use. They’re knocking over more things. They’re late a couple of days in a row. Their frequency of calling in sick has increased over the past period of time. Instead of you as a leader or you as an administrator sitting down with them and saying, we got to put you on a performance plan. We got to fix these issues. We got to do this, that, and the other thing. Instead of starting there, start with this life conversation. Because for someone to go from a model employee to, oh, my God, they’re barely making it through the door every day, something changed in in that person’s life, meaningful in that person’s life. And that is an opportunity for you to start with, Are you okay? Talk to me human to human.

You’re not in trouble. This is not going to be disciplinary. What’s going on? And start there. I’m not saying don’t have discipline. Because some people make performance plans and all those things but start with that culture of care. That’s really important to start with. So, in terms of what I actually do within organizations, the first question that I ask when I’m speaking to leaders that are like, hey, we want to train our people in this. We want to understand this better. I ask them not who are your managers, but I ask, who are the people within your organization that your people already go to for support? Maybe that is the HR department. Maybe it’s the second-tier level. So, I work with a lot of law enforcement. I do a lot of law enforcement training. And oftentimes it’s the sergeants, which is like one or two steps up from patrol. It’s not the captains, the lieutenants, the command staff. It’s the one level up. So, I want to sit down with leaders and understand who within your organization is already fielding these types of emotional pleas from people. Because those are the people that we want to start with.

If I’m coming into an organization that has a thousand people and I’m like, let’s train all of your people, they’re going to be like, we can’t take a thousand people off the front lines to come sit in this training. It’s not going to work. So who are these people that are already those cornerstones of the emotional structure of the organization? And then we’re going to train them. And everyone has been through a million and one different trainings, all the online, on demand, mandatory, click the button as fast as you possibly can to get it over with type of trainings. And that’s not what we do. We come in, we are in person, and we do a lot of roles playing and activities and scenarios. And I’m not just saying, oh, I’m going to pretend to be a person in crisis. I mean scenarios where I’m literally sobbing my eyes out in the front of the room, and we have to work through this together, and we have to practice those active listening skills. And so, what this does is it obviously is way more engaging, but it also gives folks an opportunity to practice these skills before it’s an actual crisis.

The last thing I want to have happen is teach you this amazing life model that you probably fell asleep through half of it because you’re bored out of your mind just sitting there listening to me talk for 2 hours and then say, go forth and conquer. And you’re like, well, I vaguely remember she said something about a reflective statement, but I have no idea how to use that. I’ve never done it before, and now I’m trying to talk my colleague off the roof of the building. We don’t want to have that happen. And so, we’re looking at how do we implement all of this in a way that is actionable and trainable, and people actually get something out of it. And so, we come in, we have these training sessions, we have these scenarios, we have these discussions with leadership of more from a consulting perspective of how do you change this organization? Do you want to build a peer support team? Do you want to find an EAP that actually works? Do you want to create a literal space within your organization where people can go to have these hard conversations? Because doing it in the lunchroom with everyone walking by is probably not the best idea. 

We look at the organization as a form, again, those social determinants of health and say, what can we do to fix this problem? The last thing I’ll add as well is I briefly touched on this earlier with the suicide forensic autopsies. I’ve had a few clients that I’ve worked with where they have tragically lost someone to suicide. And everyone is scrambling, emotionally, logistically, professionally. And so, we’re able to come into organizations and do those autopsies and say, hey, as an organization, here are some things to think about, here are some things to potentially actually change. I want to be very clear with that, I guess, service offering. It is not to point fingers. It is not to point fingers and say, well, this is your fault that your employee died. It is not about that. It is saying, how do we take this absolute tragedy of an instance and make sure that it doesn’t happen to anyone else? Sure. That’s really the lens that we approach that with. So, variety of different options, but the base of it is instilling these skills in folks in a way where they actually feel confident in using them and have some fun along the process.

Because, again, we don’t need another online self-paced, just click the button type training.

So, can the people that are trained, can they be peers? If it’s a unionized environment, I can imagine sometimes it’s a union rep who’s the one that people turn to. Is it always leadership type roles?

Not necessarily. When I say, hey, who are the people that your people are coming to? A lot of times it’s someone with absolutely no formal leadership role. It’s the janitor sometimes because they’re always there and they’re always seeing stuff and they’re part of that community and they recognize people. So, it doesn’t matter a leadership or not. And to your point about peer support, that is my dream, to have clients that say, okay, here are 5, 10, 15 people that people always come to. We’re going to put them through this training, and then we’re going to turn them into a formal peer support team. So how do we structure that? How do we give them access? How do we do this? How do we do that? And then it’s not just, Cool, the people know the thing, but it’s the people know the thing, and there’s actually a structure that other employees can engage with when they’re looking for that level of support. So I am all for people extrapolating this training into a formal peer support team that lives in perpetuity and that provides that legally protected confidential conversation for people when they’re looking for something.

To round this full circle back to our EAP conversations, there’s that concern of, well, I don’t really know this person. I don’t have relationship with them. They don’t understand my profession. All of those very valid challenges within EAP. And that’s what an internal peer support team or even just a culture of care in and of itself can fix. You know these people. They know you. They know your profession. They understand what it’s like. There’s our ready that baseline level of trust, which makes this whole life intervention just a million times easier from there.

And I’ve definitely heard of organizations that have done that with peers, and it really, really rave reviews in that regard because people feel more comfortable sometimes talking to somebody who does exactly the same work as them who understands the work in some cases, even that went through similar challenges. It could be drugs, alcohol, could be mental health, and then just having that recognition of somebody who understands their job, their role. Then the union as well. If you’ve got a good partnership with the union, sometimes that union rep can be also the person if they’re speaking the same language, doing similar actions.

Yes, absolutely. I’ll just add as well, if you leader are thinking, Hey, I want to put together a peer support team, I cannot instill this enough in you that it is not the people that you think are the most emotionally literate or the best at intervention that should be on the peer support team.

That’s a good point.

It needs to be the people that your people think are the most emotionally literate and the best at mental health that need to be on this peer support team. I’ve worked with organizations where I’m looking at the team and I’m looking at the people, and there’s this grumpy old dude in the corner who doesn’t want to be here and wants nothing to do with what I’m talking about. And then we find out later that he’s the team dad that everyone goes to. And so, it’s like, I want that person on the peer support team. So, you as a leader, again, it’s not about what you think or what you want or who you necessarily would trust. It’s who your people trust. Just that framing, if you take away nothing else when it comes to peer support team creation, take away that framing.

Jessi, thank you so much. Really good insights, ideas. I think it’s something that a lot of safety professionals really need to think about as to how does that fit into my safety program? If it’s within HR, how do I partner with HR to have adjacent goals around, make sure that we’re bringing this topic forward, not only just for the suicide prevention elements that you talked about, but in terms of even just directly from a safety standpoint, there’s a huge connection. If you’re not well, you’re not going to perform as safely as you possibly could in the tasks that you’re doing. So, Jessi, if somebody wants to get in touch with you, what’s the best way to do so?

Absolutely. Well, thank you for having me. This has It’s been an awesome conversation, and I’m excited for your folks to get their hands on it. I am on LinkedIn. Feel free to shoot me a message on LinkedIn. If you’re like, yes, I’m bought in. Let’s do this. I want to make sure that my people are protected with their mental health as well. Shoot me a message. I’d be more than happy to have a conversation with you. I offer free consultations related to suicide prevention where we can look at your organization, what are the risks, what’s your industry doing right now related to this, and how can we move forward there. So, questions, if you want to get started, just find me on LinkedIn, and I’m happy to have those conversations.

Awesome. Thank you so much.

Take care.

Thank you for listening to The Safety Guru on C-suite Radio. Leave a legacy. Distinguish yourself from the past. Grow your success. Capture the hearts and minds of your teams. Elevate your safety. Like every successful athlete, top leaders continuously invest in their safety leadership with an expert coach to boost safety performance. Begin your journey at execsafetycoach.com. Come back in two weeks for the next episode with your host, Eric Michrowski. This podcast is powered by Propulo Consulting.

ABOUT THE GUEST

Jessi Beyer, MHP, is an international TEDx speaker; the #1 best-selling author of How To Heal: A Practical Guide To Nine Integrative Therapies That Can Help Release Trauma; a crisis mental health professional embedded with law enforcement in Snohomish County, Washington; and a negotiator with Region 1 SWAT.

Named the 2025 Best International Mental Health Speaker by Global Health and Pharma, she has been featured in over 200 media outlets, including Thrive Global, Refinery29, and Elite Daily, and has spoken to thousands of people around the world through groups like Penn State University, Leadercast NOW, and the Institute on Violence, Abuse, and Trauma’s international summit. Jessi holds master’s degrees in critical psychology and human services (focusing on trauma and crisis intervention) from Prescott College and in military psychology (focusing on terrorism) from Adler University. Outside of her professional life, she enjoys exploring the trails of the Pacific Northwest and baking (and eating) copious amounts of chocolate chip cookies.

Jessi also holds a special passion for military and first responder mental health. Her father, cousin, and grandfathers served in the military, and Jessi has experience as an EMT, a search-and-rescue volunteer, and a First Responder Therapy Dogs K9 handler. Her heart is with those who are first on the scene, first to fight, and first to help people when they need it most.

For more information: https://jessibeyerinternational.com/

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jessierinbeyer

 

RELATED EPISODE

STAY CONNECTED

The Safety Guru with Eric Michrowski

More Episodes: https://thesafetyculture.guru/

C-Suite Radio: https://c-suitenetwork.com/the-safety-guru/

Powered By Propulo Consulting: https://propulo.com/

Eric Michrowski: https://ericmichrowski.com

EXECUTIVE SAFETY COACHING

Like every successful athlete, top leaders continuously invest in their Safety Leadership with an expert coach to boost safety performance.

Safety Leadership coaching has been limited, expensive, and exclusive for too long.

As part of Propulo Consulting’s subscription-based executive membership, our coaching partnership is tailored for top business executives that are motivated to improve safety leadership and commitment.
Unlock your full potential with the only Executive Safety Coaching for Ops & HSE leaders available on the market.
Explore your journey with Executive Safety Coaching at https://www.execsafetycoach.com.
Executive Safety Coaching_Propulo

Navigating Toxicity in the Workplace and the Importance of Self-Care for Leaders with Beverly Beuermann-King

Navigating Toxicity in the Workplace and the Importance of Self-Care for Leaders

LISTEN TO THE EPISODE: 

ABOUT THE EPISODE

In recognition of World Mental Health Day, we present a powerful and timely conversation with our returning special guest, Beverly Beuermann-King, a seasoned expert in workplace mental health. Beverly shares her insights on two critical threats to workplace safety and well-being today: toxicity in the workplace and the importance of self-care for leaders. She explores real examples of toxic workplaces and offers actionable strategies to help leaders recognize warning signs, communicate effectively, and engage in difficult conversations to address issues head-on. Beverly also unpacks the deeper drivers behind workaholism, sharing how leaders can identify root causes, set healthy boundaries, and intentionally create space to rest, recharge, and reflect, prioritizing self-care to enhance both their own well-being and that of their teams. This episode highlights why mental health isn’t just a personal wellness matter; it’s a workplace safety issue that fosters a healthier, more resilient workplace culture. Tune in for expert insights to help leaders prevent burnout, navigate toxicity in the workplace, and build environments where people and organizations can truly thrive. 

READ THE EPISODE

Real leaders leave a legacy. They capture the hearts and minds of their teams. Their origin story puts the safety and well-being of their people first. Great companies ubiquitously have safe, yet productive operations. For those companies, safety is an investment, not a cost for the C-suite. It’s a real topic of daily focus. This is the Safety Guru with your host, Eric Michrowski, a globally recognized ops and safety guru, public speaker and author. Are you ready to leave a safety legacy? Your legacy success story begins now.

Hi, and welcome to the Safety Crew. Today, I’m very excited to have back with me, Beverly Beuermann-King. She’s a corporate culture and resiliency expert previously on this show. And today we’re going to talk about topics that are related to World Mental Health Day. World Mental Health Day is celebrated every year on October 10th. The day is about coming together to talk about mental health and show everyone that mental health does matter. Today we’re going to talk about two distinct interrelated topics, I think, that are quite interesting. The first one is about toxicity in the organization. The second one is really about leader self-care, work colleagues and leaders and the impact on burnout. Obviously, both have a direct impact on safety. But let’s start talking a little bit about toxicity in the organization.

Yeah, it’s interesting because you look at a definition for the word toxic. It’s harsh, malicious, harmful. Aren’t they great words? They have an impact. We can actually see them. We can see where both toxic workplaces breed toxic employees, and toxic employees breed toxic workplaces. So, they’re back and forth. We’re impacted and affected by the people around us.

In many cases, I’ve seen in organizations where this can occur, even in a great culture, it can occur in pockets. Small pockets, parts of the Certain locations, if you’re thinking in construction company, could be one site. You’re talking about a utility, could be one region or district. Tell me a little bit about what drives that toxicity and why is it allowed to take root?

We could probably spend an entire day talking about this part, but there are certainly some themes that I’m seeing right now in workplaces, and entitlement being one of them. And so, entitlement isn’t one generation over another, but it can be because of my position, my years of service, my academic background, whatever that looks like. It’s that this is what I deserve, right? And so, it’s that myopia of looking at situations. So that can cause toxicity, right? Everything is about me. Everything is about what I can gain. There’s also in our organizations right now this us versus them mentality. It could be management up against frontline. It could be inside sales, outside sales, whatever it looks like. But it’s that high school mentality of you’re in or you’re out. Again, when we have cliques, when we have groups like that, it creates this sense of negativity and difficult attitudes and behaviors that take place. Then we also have passive-aggressive types of behaviors such as gossiping. It could be things like harassment and bullying that add into this toxicity.

That toxicity could be a leader; it could be a team member or a group of team members. You mentioned it could even be customers.

Yeah. I mean, that toxicity can come from a number of different places. Like I said, it’s impacting the organization. When it has this detrimental effect, and that effect can be on the team as a whole, it could be on a particular person, it could be on the leader, it could be on the customer, but it’s having an impact on the way that we deal with the people around us. Again, that toxicity, it grows, it permeates other areas. It’s really important that we find ways of being able to address that within our organizations.

What are some of the ways that leaders can, one, notice and identify? I’m thinking potentially a senior leader, you may have pockets of the organization. It could be just a few areas where this is occurring. How can they deal with it? Because this toxic environment breeds a very unhealthy workplace.

It does, and it can lead to all kinds of safety issues because we’re not paying attention. Sometimes I talk about leadership attentiveness as being a real key to this, because for many leaders, we have far too much to do and not enough time to do it in. Sometimes the people issues take the back burner, which allows that toxicity to fester and grow. Really good leaders, they start to pay attention to this because they know that it’s not just somebody being rude, somebody being negative. They know that the whole team is impacted by this toxicity. Really good leaders, they’re willing to do the hard stuff. They’re willing to step into these really difficult conversations in order to address the negativity so that it doesn’t impact everybody else.

In some cases, this can be very exhausting even for a leader. I remember recently, I was in a session and the leader was talking about how there is this… He didn’t use the word toxicity, but there was this toxicity, a sense of entitlement, unacceptable behaviors occurring. It was exhausting for him to interact with a group on a regular basis. Some days he just said, I just need some time out. It’s a lot to deal with.

It is a lot to deal with. On top of all of the other layer upon layer of unpredictable ability that we’re dealing with, then you have this toxicity. We’re not taught how to have these conversations, how to address it effectively. We look at different ways and different actions that can be taken. Some of them are dealing with the conversation that needs to be had and stepping into those conversations. Others are looking at what’s contributing to the negativity and the toxicity. In a lot of cases, it is this stress. It is pervasive. It is across the organization. It is causing burnout. When we understand maybe the factors behind the toxicity in the first place, as a leader, not only do you need to address the corporate culture, things like workloads and control and recognition and support and fairness, but it’s also about being able to step into the conversation and communicate in a way that’s effective so that it doesn’t keep coming back. I had one organization where the leader said, this person has been this way for 20 years. I’m like, First of all, what has allowed that person to be this way for 20 years?

We There’s been things that have allowed that to become the norm. As leaders, we need to be able to, are we creating the culture that we desire? As a team, are we stepping up and saying, this is not the culture that we want, and doing the hard work to create a positive culture?

You brought an interesting point that we’ve never really been trained or prepared on how to deal with these conversations. What are some of the tactics that leaders can use to have those challenging, difficult conversations that may be required?

I would say, first, be intentional. Tune into this. Understand that you need to address it. My number one is prepare ahead of time. What I mean by that is don’t get caught up that there’s been a blow up or there’s been a situation in a meeting and you’re reacting from a gut level. You just fire all barrel’s thing. Sure. You need to plan What is the goal of this conversation? And that’s a really big piece. What am I trying to address and what’s the goal? And then when’s the right time? When’s the right place? How is this person typically going to respond? Are they going to cry? Are they going to stomp, scream and shout? Are they going to point fingers? Are they going to start swearing and slamming doors? Whatever that looks like. And then if they do that, how am I going to respond to that situation so that I’m not just responding, I’m acting rather than reacting?

Excellent. Because I’ve seen in some cases, I’ve had people that I worked with where they would start banging on the table and screaming. And your point is really good. If you get hooked into it, then your conversation is going to derail. But if you know that’s going to come, then you can better prepare for it.

Yeah, you play those situations in your mind. How am I going to maintain my composure, my professionalism? How am I going to get to the goal of the conversation and address it appropriately? I talk about starting the conversation by listening, which is not what most leaders do. We need to say… One of the questions I ask is, what has been going well and what has not been going so well? I want to get their perspective on both of those because that could feed into some of the information that maybe I haven’t been privy to. It gives me an idea of where they’re coming from, their starting point is. Maybe for the first time, they finally feel like they’re being listened to, which can get rid of some of the toxicity in the conversation right from the get-go. Listen to what they have to say and then start to give some feedback as to how these fits with the culture that you’re creating or how it doesn’t fit with the culture that they’re creating. We often make the mistake of thinking that a really good employee, a customer, a co-leader would know that their behavior is out of alignment.

For the most part, people don’t. You need to bring it to attention of how that behavior doesn’t feed into the culture that we’re trying to create.

Interesting because you’re right, we assume that they No. But in the example, you shared just a few seconds ago about somebody who’s been doing this for 20 years, it now becomes an accepted norm.

It does. Where is it out of alignment? One of the things that I talk in my presentations to leaders is we need to start with what are our values? For me, values are our rules of engagement, and they’re not created top down. They’re created within the team. A team may have a set of values that may be different than the organizational set of values because it’s the rules of engagement. How are we going to treat each other? How are we going to get stuff done? How are we going to connect with each other? These are our rules of engagement. When we have been very clear about what it looks like when we’re living them and what it looks like when we’re not living them, then you can start to hold people accountable to the behaviors that you want to see within the team. Until you’ve got that playing field of really being clear about those definitions, it’s really hard to hold people accountable. And so that’s my first step in many cases.

You touched on the topic of accountability. How do you drive that accountability? Because there’s the first conversation, but how do you follow through to make sure that that accountability actually sets in drive change.

When I talk about these steps, the follow through is often the one that leaders miss. It’s like, we’ve had the conversation, and we will never talk about this again. It’s like a one and done. It is never a one and done. We talk about what is it that we’ve agreed to? What does that look like? How are we going to measure that? How am I going to know that that’s been happening? Is it going to be a one-on-one? Is it going to be reports from your colleagues? What does that look like? Then if this person is able to do that, great. We jump all over that. We reward that and recognize it. If they’re not, we continually go back to holding that person accountable. At some point, maybe we need to make one of those hard decisions where this person may not be the right fit for this team. Sure.

You touched on the person who’s been around 20 years, and this is how they’ve been the whole time. I’ve seen this many organizations where there’s an acceptance of certain people that may be shouldn’t belong there, individuals that cause a lot of grief, toxicity in the workplace where it’s been allowed for a long time. Leaders start accepting that this is the cards I’ve been dealt with. This is the individuals I have, and this is how they will be, and I can’t change this person. That can be this barrier where it creates even stress to have those conversations where I avoid it. I’ve seen this in more present in some organizations than others. What are some of the ways to remove some of the stress and how to convince people to address with some of these things that may be 20 years in the making?

I think as an organization and as teams, we have a responsibility to make sure that we’re creating the culture that we desire, that we work the best in, that we can bring our very best selves in. And so when it’s creating stress, when people are absent, when they don’t want to come, when there’s not that enthusiasm, when I don’t want to tell you something because I don’t know how it’s be used against me, when people are showing signs of burnout and lack of engagement, that’s why we address this stuff, because it does have an impact. It has an impact on who we are, what we can achieve, how we treat our customers, our safety, our overall health. And so, when we know and we take note of the importance, it’s a whole lot easier to make the time to deal with this stuff because we know that it’s not just, like I said earlier, it’s not just somebody being rude. It’s not just somebody who is, that’s just who they are. No, it’s having an impact on everybody and the way that we do the job. We’re losing really good people because of it.

I love the simplicity of how you present it around toxicity in the organization. Very similar as well to some of the themes I’m hearing more and more in the safety space, safety arena, around psychosocial risks. Just these pockets in the organization where it’s causing a negative impact on the people working it. Just very simple ways to address it, but you’re really bring in the importance of bringing that to the forefront. I appreciate that.

We talk a lot about the factors that make for a good workplace, and respect and appreciation is one of those. Are we working in a situation where there’s respect for my time, my energy, my education, my contribution, Am I being appreciated for that contribution as well? What does that look like? It’s not necessarily financial either. It’s how am I being acknowledged? When we allow that toxicity to take place, it’s taking away from everything that’s core to who we are.

Absolutely. That’s a great topic. The other one I wanted to touch on as we celebrate World Mental Health Day is the topic of leader burnout. We You talked about workaholic, but also the element of leader self-care. When you first joined me on the first episode, you talked a lot about the impact on team members around some of the elements of burnout and so forth. I love the research you’re doing recently around workaholic, and you identified different types of drivers for being a workaholic. Can you share a little bit more about those drivers, but also why it really matters to understand which one is driving that behavior?

This episode of the Safety Guru podcast is brought to you by Propulo Consulting, the leading safety and safety culture advisory firm. Whether you are looking to assess your safety culture, develop strategies to level up your safety performance, introduce human performance capabilities, re-energize your BBS program, enhance supervisory safety capabilities, or introduce unique safety leadership training and talent solutions, Propulo has you covered. Visit us at propulo.com.

It’s hard because a strong work ethic is absolutely admirable. It’s what we’re looking for. But there’s a difference because a stronger work ethic helps us to progress. It helps us to achieve our goals. It helps us to do the things that we need to do. But when it moves into being a workaholism, it’s not about choosing to work hard. It’s about being unable to stop. It’s about not having the balance. And so, it does have an impact on who we are. We become more anxious. We have difficulty separating ourselves. We’re not involved in We’re not present in our personal lives, right? Because we’re continually thinking about what needs to be done. And sometimes we equate that with who we are. That’s just who I am, right?

That’s my self-worth. I do this because… But it’s because I can’t stop. That’s where the line is. I can’t separate myself.

Can you touch on the different types of workaholics? Because I think that’s also interesting to understand what’s driving that inability to stop.

When I do my program on dealing with difficult people, I have these eight animals that I use for the personalities, right? And so, when I was looking at this, I’m like, well, you know what? People remember the animal. So, I did the animals for the different types of workaholics as well. And I think that gives them a sense of who they are. It puts it into a bit of a perspective. So, the over committing beaver, right? It’s that person who is always building it. They’re always trying to take on more than they can manage. And so, they’re the people that are involved in every project. They’re accepting all of these extra committees. Their plate’s already full, but they’re taking on more. So, they get overwhelmed. They don’t have balance. There’s no time for recovery. So, we see the downside. So, we see the good side, right? They’re getting all this stuff done, busy like fever, but it’s having that impact of there’s no space, there’s no time for recovery. So, when there’s an emergency, what do you do? You don’t have any of the reserves. So that’s one. The attention seeking moth. They’re drawn to the light of recognition.

They’re looking for approval. They want people to notice what are they doing. So, they’re going to stay late. They’re going to show that they’re putting all of this time and energy. They don’t take their vacations because they’re just so busy. So, they’re always looking for recognition. And their self-worth really relies on that recognition, which leads them only to being exhausted. Sure. The light goes away. Let’s see. Who else is an interesting one? The shark. They can’t stop moving. With a shark, if they stop moving, they can’t breathe. It’s that same thing that they’re always moving, they’re always… They can’t stop. There’s never a celebration of the project that they’ve just completed. They’re already into the next one. There’s never this recognition. There are never these pauses. There’s never this outward-looking to the team and saying, Hey, good job, because we’re already into the next one, which it’s compulsive. They’re working through the night. There are never-ending tasks in front of them. I love this because there’s so many different types. There’s the lone wolf who just won’t delegate because nobody can do it like they do. It’s that they have to check every detail, which if you’re working for that person, it’s like, well, why did I do this if you’re going to do it anyways?

It demotivates the people around, and then things fall apart. If we don’t see some of the other things that could be causing hazards, when we talk about safety, they may not be noticing the things that they should have their eye on because they’re so busy checking other people’s work.

Sure. I love the connection with the animals. It makes it very memorable in terms of the analogies, and those are really good comparisons. It’s also something that we tend to reward and recognize in businesses. If I look at many senior leaders I’ve worked with over the years, they tend to work really hard, and that’s something that’s appreciated. They work through the night to get things done. Through storms, through whatever may happen, they’re doing good work. How do we balance this as you talked about before, the value of somebody who’s productive, who’s efficient, and recognizing those pieces with making sure we don’t create or encourage workaholics?

We talk about Functional and nonfunctional, right? So, for many work colleagues, they appear very functional. They’re productive, they’re reliable. And like you said, their drive is elevated. It’s admired, right? They’re praised for their persistence and their loyalty. But we can only keep that pace up for a while without it. And then it’s going to have these impacts. And so, we see, then it moves into the nonfunctional, where there’s chaos and you have to become even more controlling. And it undermines other people and other people’s performance because you can’t keep into that level. Often, we think of there’s this productivity paradox where more doesn’t equal better. It does have an impact on the team. People don’t want to work for somebody like that. If we’re talking about leaders, we see more absenteeism, more turnover, more disengagement. Then as that disengagement, that becomes burnout, it becomes safety issues, it becomes mental health issues. It does have a negative impact.

How would an organization balance the desire? Because it’s often that person who’s always getting things done is desirable versus a person who gets nothing done or who is a slacker at the other end of the extreme. We can send the wrong signals as well in terms of encouraging that behavior inadvertently.

Yeah, I think we go back to looking at making it acceptable to say no. Sure. Because we want to please, we want to do a good job? What does success look like? And so, we’re going to try harder. But we need to make it acceptable to say, no, I can’t do it right now or no, I have too many things on my plate. It’s about as a leader, making make sure that you’re setting realistic workloads. And one of the things I talk about right now is what does realistic look like right now? Because what it looked like five years ago may not be realistic today. And so, is that How does that play out? Then also, do people have the right resources to do the job? Do you have enough people on your team to do what you need to do? Do you have the right technology? The other piece with that, I talked about respect and appreciation, but are we rewarding effectiveness? Are we rewarding collaboration? Are we rewarding sustainability in getting things done? Like sustainability It’s a valuable effort. So, burning out, that’s not what we’re looking for, right? And so, are we rewarding in our organizations the right things?

So, it’s not necessarily about hours. The hour that you’re logged on or the hours that you’re working, but hey, it’s completing a project. How did we complete it? Did we complete it in a way where there was innovation and collaboration and quality? Was there effective problem solving and communication? If we’re looking at the right things, then people can still be successful. They can still work hard, but we’re not burning them out.

If you’re a leader and you recognize yourself as a as a shark, as a busy beaver, as, I think, the moth. I can’t remember the other animal, but if you recognize yourself in one of these animals, what can you do? The good old expression around put your own oxygen on mask first, that we hear in every safety demonstration. Tell me a little bit more about what that leader can do.

Recognize what’s driving the behavior in the first place. Are you afraid that you’re not good enough? Are you avoiding something in your personal life so it’s easier to be at work? Why are you doing the things that you’re doing? And then start to set some boundaries, those boundaries for yourself. It may be something as simple as making sure you’re taking your full lunch break. It may be something as simple as making sure that you’re not checking your work emails after whatever specific time, after It’s a set a boundary, eight o’clock. After eight o’clock, I am completely disconnected. And so, start small with those boundaries. It’s going to feel uncomfortable. It’s going to feel like I need to be doing this stuff. It’s odd to have time on your hands. Sure. But then look at how can I then, with that time, do something for myself in self-care? It might be rest, it might be recharging, it might be doing something that brings you joy that maybe you’ve stepped away from. Maybe it’s simply having time to reflect and to think about what the future might be like. So then once we’ve got that and then look at ways of redefining who you are.

It can’t solely be on your productivity. It can’t solely be about your achievements. Who are you at your core? What makes you valuable? What makes you worthy? And it doesn’t necessarily need to be about how much accomplish in a day, which for me, that’s a big one. My worth is, how many things did I get off my to-do list? What projects did I get done? And not who am I at the core? And so, for me, that’s one of my hardest ones. We’re not perfect. And so, embracing that imperfection again, which is really hard to do when you’re when you’re stuck in that workaholic mode.

And I had an executive coach who shared that Those boundaries can be set in the day and should be set in the day but also should be set over long periods of time. You talked about not taking your vacations as an example. But his point was also, even if you work very hard, at least then counterbalance it with extended vacations. So, more time off, more time to recharge. Any truth, thoughts around that?

Absolutely. There are rejuvenation periods that you can take an extra day on a long weekend, make it a long weekend. But then there needs to be more chunked periods of time. I think the easiest thing to do is to plan those out far in advance, because if we wait for the perfect time to take our vacation, it will never come. I’m in that mode right now, too. We were hit very hard with the ice storms here on our property, and so we’ve been working very hard to put things back together. We’re looking, here’s the whole summer has been spent, and We haven’t gone on our vacation because… And so now we’re looking at the fall saying, okay, we can’t keep this up. What are we doing to connect? What are we doing to get together? And I’m craving it now, whereas before, I was like, we just got to get through this stuff.

But you bring an interesting point because in some cases, workaholic substitute workaholic in the work environment to workaholic at home, where you check in, what did you do on vacation? And I worked hard to build something or do something at home, and you’re actually never really disconnecting. You’re just changing the work.

Yeah. If you’re feeling pushed or… When I talk about vacations, it’s what’s the purpose of your vacation? Sure. Of your vacation. Some vacations are to get projects done at home, but other times it needs to be for relaxation or rejuvenation or reconnection. And so, are you planning the to meet your purpose? Often people will say, I want to get reconnected to my family, but then they book 15 side trips and you’re running and everybody’s in a hurry and we never had time to actually really connect. And then people come back saying, I need a vacation from my vacation. It didn’t fit the purpose. And so, are we planning our life in a way that is purposeful? At the beginning, I said, are we acting rather than reacting? And I think that’s a good theme for how we live or are we acting in a way that is congruent to who we want to be? Are we acting in a way that allows us to be engaged and be involved and achieve the things that we want to achieve in a healthy way so that We’re not burning ourselves out so that we’re not experiencing extreme anxiety or depression or this guilt that takes us away from everything.

Your example just makes me think that one can bring their workaholic state to their vacation and say, how do I have an efficient vacation where I maximize every second and just bring in that same temperament ideas into your opportunity to disconnect?

I love when I see there’s… Generally, in family vacations, there’s always somebody in the family or in the friend group who has everything planned down to the nanosecond. And then there’s other people that are in the group who are like, where are we going? Okay, great. What do I need to pack? Okay, I’ve got one of those. It’s interesting because they may not be that way in the workplace, or they may be exactly that way in the workplace. I always find it really interesting where the person who at work has everything completely planned, but where they can completely let go in their vacation. That’s the best of both. Where you’re able to let things flow and happen, and you don’t get upset and anxious when you don’t know every moment of every detail.

Beverley, it’s such a pleasure to have you back on the show. I think we touched on two really critical topics as we cover World Mental Health Day. One is the element of toxicity in the organization. How do you recognize it? How do you deal with it? And some of the strategies to have those difficult conversations and hold people accountable around it. I think that’s a really, really critical topic around workplace health, but also ultimately safety, as you mentioned. Then the second part is the leader self-care. How do I make sure that as a leader, I don’t burn out? Because if I’m burning out, I’m not going to be a great leader for my team as you touched on. I’m not going to be a great safety leader. I’m not going to be looking out for the signs or symptoms that something’s going to be maybe off. I’m not going to be interacting with my teams the way I should. Two really critical topics. If somebody wants to get in touch with you, what’s the best way for them to do that?

You can reach me through my website at [email protected], where the website is worksmartlivesmart.com. There’s all kinds of articles on toxicity and dealing with difficult people and burnout and mental health. I think there’s over 500 articles there. If you’re looking for more, that’s a great place to go and grab more information, especially as we celebrate World Mental Health Day, Healthy Workplaces Month, Mental Illness Awareness Week. October is so rich for all of these celebrations that really focus on how we take care of ourselves.

You run a whole breadth of workshops, help a lot of organizations in this corporate culture, the resiliency space, such a critical topic these days. I appreciate you having me back. Thank you.

Thank you so much for having me here.

Thank you for listening to The Safety Guru on C-suite Radio. Leave a legacy. Distinguish yourself from the past. Grow your success. Capture the hearts and minds of your teams. Elevate your safety. Like every successful athlete, top leaders continuously invest in their safety leadership with an expert coach to boost safety performance. Begin your journey at execsafetycoach.com. Come back in two weeks for the next episode with your host, Eric Michrowski. This podcast is powered by Propulo Consulting.

ABOUT THE GUEST

With an impressive track record spanning over 25 years, Beverly Beuermann-King has been guiding individuals and organizations toward mastering their reactions to stress, cultivating resilience, and achieving thriving, successful lives through her innovative S-O-S Principle™.

As the driving force behind WorkSmartLiveSmart.com since 1995, Beverly has been at the forefront of transforming teams across diverse industries, including healthcare, education, government agencies, finance, and not-for-profit sectors, from overwhelmed to resilient powerhouses. Her presentations, rooted in extensive research and drawing from her background in psychology, sociology, management, and adult education, are both enlightening and inspirational, offering audiences the precise strategies needed to improve mental health, tackle workplace challenges, and amplify overall life satisfaction.

Beverly‘s influence extends far beyond her captivating speaking engagements. She is a prolific author, esteemed podcaster, and a sought-after media and brand spokesperson, gracing over 500 television and radio shows. Recognized as one of the esteemed Certified Speaking Professionals, a distinction held by less than 70 Canadians, she has also made history as the inaugural Certified Virtual Presenter through eSpeakers and Power Women WorldWide. And currently, Beverly is the National President of the Canadian Association of Professional Speakers. Prepare to be captivated as Beverly empowers you to conquer stress, cultivate resilience, and unlock the secrets to a healthier, more fulfilling life.

For more information: www.WorkSmartLiveSmart.com

Articles to support the conversation:

https://worksmartlivesmart.com/reality-of-toxic-workplaces/

https://worksmartlivesmart.com/workaholic-types/

RELATED EPISODE

STAY CONNECTED

The Safety Guru with Eric Michrowski

More Episodes: https://thesafetyculture.guru/

C-Suite Radio: https://c-suitenetwork.com/the-safety-guru/

Powered By Propulo Consulting: https://propulo.com/

Eric Michrowski: https://ericmichrowski.com

EXECUTIVE SAFETY COACHING

Like every successful athlete, top leaders continuously invest in their Safety Leadership with an expert coach to boost safety performance.

Safety Leadership coaching has been limited, expensive, and exclusive for too long.

As part of Propulo Consulting’s subscription-based executive membership, our coaching partnership is tailored for top business executives that are motivated to improve safety leadership and commitment.
Unlock your full potential with the only Executive Safety Coaching for Ops & HSE leaders available on the market.
Explore your journey with Executive Safety Coaching at https://www.execsafetycoach.com.
Executive Safety Coaching_Propulo

Mind Matters: The Crucial Link Between Mental Health, Psychosocial Risks, and Workplace Safety with Anna Feringa

Mind Matters: The Crucial Link Between Mental Health, Psychosocial Risks, and Workplace Safety

LISTEN TO THE EPISODE: 

ABOUT THE EPISODE

In recognition of Mental Health Awareness Month, we’re very excited to feature Anna Feringa, expert in leadership and Mental Health and best practices in workplace Mental Health, on the podcast this week. “No one can be 100% safe in any workplace if they’re not healthy both mind and body.” When an individual is not well in their mind, they’re more inclined to make poor decisions resulting in more physical injuries and human error in the workplace. Tune in as Anna emphasizes the crucial link between mental health, psychosocial risks, and workplace safety. Discover insightful strategies for mitigating these risks within your organization to reduce injury and cultivate a positive workplace culture.

READ THIS EPISODE

Real leaders leave a legacy. They capture the hearts and minds of their teams. Their origin story puts the safety and well-being of their people first. Great companies ubiquitously have safe yet productive operations. For those companies, safety is an investment, not a cost for the C suite. It’s a real topic of daily focus. This is The Safety Guru with your host, Eric Michrowski, a globally recognized ops and safety guru, public speaker, and author. Are you ready to leave a safety legacy? Your legacy’s success story begins now.

Hi, and welcome to The Safety Guru. May is Mental Health Awareness Month. Today, I am very excited to have a great guest on our show. Her name is Anna Feringa. She’s a workplace mental health consultant with a background in organizational psychology, has been in the field for well over 18 years. She’s also a global top 10 LinkedIn voice of 2022 and a leading expert in mental health. Very good to have you on the show today. I’d love to get started maybe with a bit of a background as to how did you get passionate about this space, mental health, and we’ll obviously talk about mental health and safety.

Thanks, Eric. It’s absolute pleasure to be on and a very warm welcome to all of our listeners. Thank you for joining us. Look, the field of workplace mental health, it’s a pretty hot topic now.

Yes.

18 years ago, not so much. But particularly in Australia, it’s become certainly top of policy, forefront of mind. But how I got into it, it’s a really interesting question, Eric. I went through university with these grandiose ideas of becoming a criminal psychologist and spent a lot of time in our glorious Australian prisons and so forth, had an absolute ball, but looked at all the psychologists around me that were 30 years my senior, and I’m like, they were just completely devoid of emotion. And I’m like, I want to be able to feel empathy in 30 years, so I’m going to switch. And I ended up going into the personal injury field. And what that means, because it’s quite a conflated topic, what that means here in Australia is I was working in the field of both post motor vehicle accident and workplace injuries. So having a look at all the types of particular mental conditions, psychological conditions that can result after being exposed to trauma. Sure. So that led me down a lot of years in the insurance path, personal injury, regulatory explorations, legislation, or the very thin legislation that existed in Australia at the time. 

And I just spat out at the end as a bit of a mixed bucket of knowledge. And I’m like, Right, well, rather than responding to injuries once they’ve occurred, particularly in the workplace, what’s going on in the prevention space? And there was this massive gap, and there still is this massive gap. So that’s what keeps me very busy as a workplace mental health consultant is getting in and working with workplaces to help them firstly understand what it means and also the benefits and consequences of either proactively engaging in good mental health and good work design or not. So, it is one of the leading causes of disability across the globe. It is costing the globe in excess of $6 trillion a year in lost productivity, injury recovery expenses, turnover, you name it. So, it’s a really big industry for making sure that workplaces have more knowledge and better structure around how to keep their people safer whilst they do their role.

Excellent. Great segue into first theme I’d like to touch on, which is mental health is not separate from safety. So, can you expand in terms of the linkage? Because a lot of organizations look at mental health on one side in HR, and then they’ll have safety separately looking at how do I prevent injuries. Tell me a little bit about the link between both.

Yeah, sure. Firstly, if someone could take their brain out of their body and sit it next to them and go, this is a separate entity to my body, then that’s my first linkage, Eric, is no one can be 100 % safe in any workplace if they’re not healthy, both mind and body. So, it is absolutely a safety issue. For far too long, and it continues to be, it’s been, Okay, let’s keep everyone physically safe. Let’s invest in education. Let’s make sure that there’s a bunch of liability around keeping someone physically safe. But this whole wellness of the mind piece, we’ll just chuck some yogurt at them and maybe a few fruit boxes and call them a benefit. But if you at any stage get depressed or anxious at work, it’s really got nothing to do with us. We just hope that you make the right decisions whilst you continue to decline in your cognitive abilities. And we efficiently refer to it as psychosocial ergonomics. And that is, if someone’s not well in the mind for whatever reason, they’re more inclined to make poor decisions, which is resulting in physical injuries and human error. So, they are absolutely linked.

A fruit box and a resilience training session is not working. And I challenge anyone to show me the evidence that it is working. And when I say working, I mean, it is not preventing injury. It’s simply just helping them recover and then chucking staff back into the fryer pan where they got injured in the first place. So, it’s like this vicious little cycle of, we’ll fix you, but we won’t change the environment. So, with physical safety, if something is allegedly going to cause someone harm, then workplaces jump to it. They fix it. They assess how things can be done differently. Whereas we’re not there with mental health yet. We’re 30 years behind where physical safety is. But if we don’t treat mental health along the same hierarchy as safety, then we’re going to see a lot more people become very ill. We’re going to see companies go backwards, both in ROI and reputation, and basically fail to be enterprise ready for the future. So, this is a big thing. And it absolutely is safety. And until it’s recognized as safety, people are going to be falling at the forefront of poor mental health and workplaces and suffering the consequences for it. And I think from what you’re sharing, and I definitely see data to that effect, when you’ve got people that are… If you’re not addressing the wellbeing, the mental health component, you’re also going to have more workplace injuries. So, it’s also a way to get to the next plateau of injury reduction.

Absolutely. You’ve just nailed it, Eric. There’s no other way to explain it. Healthy people work better, are better, perform better. And when I say perform, look, it’s great to hit targets, but it’s also great to come home safely. And every employer really has the responsibility to keep their employees safe to the point where it’s reasonable and practicable, of course. We don’t have a silver bullet for everyone. And there’s things beyond employer’s controls. But at this stage, nothing’s really in place anywhere. So, there’s efforts, there’s intentions. A lot of workplaces are well intended, but we’re still waiting our way through what really works. And I’m sure that you and I’ll branch out into that later. But it is a very infantile space, but yet such an urgent one.

Absolutely. So, you’ve touched on the value of addressing mental health from the trillions that are being lost. You’ve touched on the impact on physical safety. What else can we add to the case for mental health focus in a workplace?

There are bucket loads. I guess the question is, do you want to talk about the consequences, or do you want to talk about the benefits? Because there’s plenty of both. I guess I’ll just start with the benefits, and that is, if you’re people working in a well-designed role, it all really comes down to work design. And that is the bit that freaks companies out. And I mean that respectfully to our listeners. And that’s a lot of work to do. We can’t revaluate how work is done. It’s just too much of a disruption to the business. So, my response to that is, can everyone just take a look at what companies did two years ago? For a pandemic, we literally flipped companies on their heads in two seconds to keep production happening and to keep people safe. So, companies are really running out of excuses with the no budget, no time, no resources to revaluate how work is done to keep you safer because your staff have seen you do it. And so, one of the consequences is that staff will simply move on to another employer where they feel safer. And that’s why we’ve got the great resignation sweeping the globe, because people have realized they don’t really have to stay.

There are exceptional circumstances, of course. If I don’t have to stay in a place that I hate or that I feel unsafe in, or that I’m working in a role that is burning me out and no one’s doing anything about it because they have the attitude that, well, that’s just always the way it’s always been done. If you can’t do it, there’s the door. The benefit of investing in this area is you’re going to get better talent acquisition. You’re going to get better people that are a better job fit. You’re going to get people that work well for you. And if you’re not prepared in this industry, then buckle up because you’re going to get a bunch of people that are not going to be fit for your role. Your personal injury or compensation claims, depending on what scheme you’re under, are going to skyrocket. Your culture is going to suffer, which is going to impact your bottom line, which is going to cost you money anyway. So, it’s about investing a little to save a lot. So, the benefits are you will be competitive. You’ll have better people. You will have higher production. You will have less injuries.

You will have a better culture. And that all really serves, with a bunch of evidence base, to suggest that that’s what good work looks like.

We’ll dive into the topic of work design soon because I think it’s important for listeners to understand what it means. But before we go there, one topic that is emerging definitely in Australia, it’s starting to emerge in other locations is the concept of psychosocial risk. Can you tell me more? What is it? Big words, but a lot of people still haven’t heard of it.

Yeah, absolutely. I mean, it’s become legislation in Australia, Eric, and half the people still don’t know what it means. It’s actually in our basic fundamental laws now, and people are like, what does psychosocial mean? So basically, what psychosocial risk is, is anything that could potentially cause you a mental injury or mental harm. Okay. So, it’s like you and I walking on a mine site, and a particular pathway to an open cut mine has not been clearly identified. Therefore, the risk to you and I, Eric, is one of us is likely to become injured. So psychosocial risk is anything that in the course of work, or in the course of the environment, or in the course of interpersonal activity between people, coworkers, managers, staff, that can cause someone to become mentally harmed. But then I’m a very big stickler for terms. And again, I sat on a round table last night. And again, what we had to do is clean up language. So, people are using psychosocial risk and psychological safety as one term. They are absolutely fundamentally related but to different contract. So psychosocial risk is anything throughout the course of employment, interpersonal, environmental that can harm you.

Psychological safety is creating a workplace where people feel safe enough to voice their opinion, raise risk without fear of retribution. So, you can’t have one without the other. You need to clean up your psychosocial risks before you can achieve what I call the pinnacle or the oracle, and that is a psychologically safe workplace. So psychosocial risk really is just like a physical safety risk, but it relates to the mind.

So, what are some of the mitigating factors that organizations can explore? Because this is a fairly broad definition of a risk in terms of everything that could harm you. It’s quite broad.

It is. And it’s also very subjective. So, I guess, and again, this is such an infantile space. So I’d love to turn around and go, here’s A to Z mitigation strategies. Eric, here they are. Like, globe, please learn them. But in Australia, we’re understanding the concept that, okay, it is now in our work health safety legislation that employers need to be proactive in mitigating risk. And everyone’s just looking at each other going, Okay, great laws, but how do we do that exactly? So, we’re seeing this area of psychosocial risk assessments starting to emerge. And there’s good ones and there’s not so good ones, as with any new concept that’s been born. So, I guess one of the mitigating factors would be to pick up one of these psychosocial risk assessments. And there’s many of them. I would just plug it into Google and see what comes up, because it’s going to vary from country to country. I can make some great recommendations in Australia, but I’m not here to do that today. So, what that means for our listeners is you need to talk to your people and ask them, what is your risk tolerance? If you’re working in retail and getting abused up team times a day, sure, there’s a factor in there that we can’t necessarily control.

But what are we doing afterwards? I mean, if you’re working in emergency services, you’re going to see a lot of trauma. We can’t necessarily control that. But what we can control is how much access are they getting? How much exposure are they getting? How can we control that and rotate that? How are we checking in on our people to make sure that they’re coping? How are we monitoring appropriate leave and downtime and debriefing? Or has all of that become automated? So, step one, consider a psychosocial risk assessment. Within those risk assessments, people are consulted anyway. But there’s other ways you can talk to your people. And thirdly, you need to make sure that your leaders are, in some shape, way, or form, provided the skill to be able to have a conversation with their team and their people. So firstly, they need to understand what psychosocial risk is before they can inquire about it with their people in a safe and protected way. So, we can’t really mitigate risks that we don’t know are there. And the best way to identify risk is by talking to people, talking to staff, going, What’s tolerable? What’s not tolerable?

How’s the role designed? Do you have any suggestions about the way it can be done better? Because that’s where a lot of, particularly, Australian companies are finding or farming the gold is, wow, our staff that we press play on every day actually have some pretty great ideas about how we can better improve some of y our social safety. So definitely risk assessments, definitely staff consultation in whatever form, focus groups, the good old survey. Companies tend to eye roll a little bit around surveys, but it’s important that however you can gather that information because that’s where you’ll start to identify gaps and that’s where you’ll start to identify risk. Sure. Like you said before, Eric, it is a really complex field because it’s subjective. So what a lot of organizations are doing is gathering what the main risks are. So, there might be some outliers of people getting stressed for different reasons. But okay, a lot of our staff in this division are burnt out for this reason. Well, let’s just have a look at this reason, not 50 million different reasons as to why I’m burnt out. If there’s a theme or a pattern, if you like, they’re chunking it down that way.

But it’s a long process. It’s not going to happen overnight. And a good risk assessment isn’t just done once. It’s a continuous improvement. They run regularly. But I guess the next battle is, Okay, we’ve run a risk assessment, therefore, we can prove that we’re risk adverse. Well, no, because a lot of companies misconstrue the fact of assessment as intervention. When you get that information, you got to do stuff with it, right?

You have to. It’s no different than safety culture assessment. You’re assessing where you’re at to understand your themes, and then you build a strategy to execute, and then you retest. Have I made a difference?

Yeah, absolutely. And I mean, probably to soothe our listeners as well, because I’m probably making this sound very complicated. And the world of psychology is not linear. But if you’re a safety professional listening today, it really is just approaching psychosocial risk in a way that’s very, very similar to the way we’ve practiced physical safety. It is about consult. It’s about identified. It’s about analyzed. It’s about responded. It’s about a value weight. It’s about change. And then it’s about repeat. So, you really don’t have to look at psychosocial safety as a completely different construct with how we mitigate. A lot of the themes that are coming through, particularly here in Australia, is the more similar you can keep it to physical safety, you’re on your way.

This episode of the Safety Guru podcast is brought to you by Propulo Consulting, the leading safety and safety culture advisory firm. Whether you are looking to assess your safety culture, develop strategies to level up your safety performance, introduce human performance capabilities, re-energize your BBS program, enhance supervisory safety capabilities, or introduce unique safety leadership training and talent solutions, Propulo has you covered. Visit us at propulo.com.

You touched on an approach around work design, and I think work design is key. You alluded to a few examples, I think, in terms of the rotation of if I’m dealing with certain critical stressors that maybe I’m rotating through it. I’m not spending the entire day dealing with it. Tell me more about what that could look like in terms of the work design, because I agree with you, work can be redesigned. We’ve proved it a few years ago when everybody went remote.

Absolutely. So, it absolutely can be done. The reason why it’s not now is because of just the perceived complexity. I mean, you and I could tease apart 50 million roles and what that looks like, but that’s not why we’re here today. It’s basically to sell the message that your people will continue to perform half mask. Your people will continue to become mentally unwell in poorly designed roles. And when I say poorly designed, at one stage, they’ll probably wonderfully design roles. But like life, everything evolves. And so, it’s about designing work that’s good for people. And like anything, you need to get in there and have a look at the way roles are done. Because at the moment, what I’m seeing, and I call it your primary, secondary, and tertiary response. And we’ve got a bunch of employers, particularly in Australia and around the world, that are investing in the tertiary stuff. In Australia, we’ve got employee assistance programs, which is, Okay, works pretty much screwed you up. You’re pretty unwell. Here’s a number that you can call and talk to a clinical psychologist and get a little bit better. And then we’re going to chuck you back into that same role and just watch you reinjure.

Also, we’re going to bring in a keynote speaker that’s going to tell you about their journey of mental health, which absolutely has a place, but it’s not fixing the direct linear causal factor of why these people are becoming unwell. And that center around how work is done. I say they’re tursury interventions. They absolutely have a place, but they’re very reactionary, where primary is about prevention, and secondary is about early intervention, and tursury is about all the pure reactionary stuff that we do to help people. But the focus shouldn’t be on fixing people. The focus should be on revaluating and redesigning the environment, so we don’t really have people to fix. It really does mean work design really needs to sit squarely in the prevention area. And that’s where we’re going to see people really start to improve in their mental health, really start to work well, hang around with your company longer. You’re going to have fewer turnover costs. You’re going to have less, I call it the HR bottleneck, where people are tired, they’re burnt out. They’re working in roles that they don’t have a say in how it’s designed. They’re overworked, they’re under work, they’re exposed to trauma.

Well, how can we get in there and fix this up a little bit? And when was the last conversation at the board level around why this is important? Because money is important, competition and growth are important. Well, you need healthy people in order to help you do that into the future. So, it’s the key to growth, is healthy people.

But it’s interesting because as you share these examples, I’m also thinking that a lot of the work that’s designed is designed by process engineers, people that are really looking at how do I optimize, which often means how do I create an assembly line that repeats, repeats, repeats, which is not necessarily good for the well-being of people. But that tends to be how work gets redesigned, or in HR functions that start looking at org structure, which again, doesn’t look at the person, it looks at how do I do this more efficiently.  

Absolutely. And so that’s the new concept of work design, right? So, all of those structural and very talented people absolutely have a role in how work is done. But we need to make it almost trans disciplinary. And that is, okay, so here’s how the role can be done to its ultimate functionality. But what’s the impact on human health here? So, it really does need to be a trans disciplinary approach where you’ve got some people that are potentially upskilled in the psychosocial risk area and go, Okay, well, we can stick someone behind a conveyor belt for nine hours a day on repetition. So not only are they probably risking a repetitive strain injury, but they’re also going to become incredibly disengaged, which means they’re going to start underperforming, which means they’re going to start heading down the path of what poor mental health looks like. And I’m not necessarily diagnosing anyone because mental health is a spectrum, but everyone needs an engaged employee to make sure that their mind is well enough to continue to make good decisions. And again, that’s that direct link back to injury or poor performance, which frightens companies. So, when you’re looking at redesigning work, make sure you’ve got the right heads in the room that have a say, and not just make it about process, but make it about healthy functionality as well.

Because even if you strip back a process 20 %, which means, okay, great, we’re going to lose 20 % of our production. Well over the course of the year, your turnover rates are going to half. The employees that you do have are going to perform better, which means ultimately, what you’re designing here, you’re going to get anyway, if not double or triple that. You’re not going to be able to achieve that, what the structural engineer said, if you’re burning people out, not giving them appropriate respite, not actually giving them the value-add piece in giving them a say in how their roles are done, because you’re going to end up… We call it the financial proverbial bubble. It looks great and shiny and well designed in the beginning, but watch people drop off over time if we’re not considering human health factors in the initial stages of how we design work.

Absolutely. So, you touched on the importance of the board’s involvement in executives. Let’s double click on that one.

Yeah. Well, that’s the biggest barrier because it’s getting a bit easier in Australia because they have to do it now. It’s not just a value add. The last 18 years in the field, Eric, I call it 16 years of convincing, and now it’s law. Well, however it gets in the building, I don’t really care, to be honest, because I know that people are going to benefit from it. But boards and trusts and executives or C suite or whatever terminology you want to bring to it. Look, some of them are engaged, but even with laws here in Australia, they’re still not engaged. Really? Yeah. They find it confusing. They find it expensive. They find it disruptive. So unfortunately, just like anything, we’re going to see a couple of really big pieces of case law drop where directors are imprisoned because there’s jail time linked to poor psychosocial risk management now. We had two senior managers in Victoria, Australia, were jailed last year. So, they’re not mucking around with this stuff. But even then, getting it in front of the board and getting them to buy into this. And I know it’s incredible. It’s a lot harder in other countries where it’s not legislated.

Correct. But there are people listening in that have an interest with this then the four Cs, I call it. And that is, what’s the cost? And to sell what the cost is, well, let’s have a look at our absenteeism rates, our turnover rates, our production rates, our injury claims, if that particular scheme exists in your respective country. Let’s have a look at retraining costs, because all that is costing millions. Of course. The Gallup Institute said a burnt-out employee will actually cost the company three times their salary. That’s one burnt out human, right? So, there’s absolutely cost, whether it’s direct or indirect associated. So, if you’re able to tell that story via data, that’s really good. That’s going to appease the CFO. That’s going to appease everyone that’s just going, Okay, well, how much is going to cost and why? And why do we need to give you budget? I get a little bit cheeky here. Why do we need to pay to keep humans safe? And that just boggles my mind. But anyway, it is what it is. The second one is culture. So, we’ve got cost, we’ve got culture. So, if you’ve got a better culture, that’s just all senses of goodness, which I’ve discussed.

I won’t be repetitive, but teams are going to toxify less. People are going to have better relationships with their leaders. People are going to feel safe enough to speak up about risk early on, rather than becoming incredibly injured, and you’re either losing an employee or paying for one to get well. So, you want a really good culture. And also, as younger workforces flow into workplaces, which is unavoidable, they’re actually coming in and asking questions. They’re like, Okay, well, I’ve got three other interviews today. How is your company going to keep me psychologically safe? Because you’ve said there’s a few risks involved with this role, and I’m prepared to take those on. But what are you going to do for me? Right. How are you going to keep me safe? Because you’ve clearly outlined how you’re going to keep me physically safe. You might give me the appropriate PPE. You might give me X, Y, Z. But how are you going to keep me psychologically safe? And if employers aren’t able to answer that, they’re going to go and work for the company that can. So, there is talent acquisition, being enterprise ready, getting the right fit for the right role in the organization.

That’s really appealing to boards and executives. Then we’ve got competition, which interludes with what I just said. You want to be competitive. You need the right people in your organization to continue to keep your competitive edge. And if they’re all going to work with the other organization that does give a hoot about people’s mental health, then you’re absolutely not going to be enterprise ready for the future. You’re going to struggle. There’s a lot of evidence to say, if you don’t get behind this, you’re pretty much going to be dead in the water in 10 years. Because particularly the younger workforce… And I don’t mean to be age bias here, but younger people are getting more education around mental health and what that looks like earlier on. Eric, when you and I were at school, we didn’t talk about mental health. It didn’t exist where it’s very much on the younger workers dialect. And it’s very much not necessarily a benefit, but a right. I have a right to be safe. And so, again, competition. If you want to be competitive and keep those doors open, you need to embrace this stuff because it’s not going away.

Just because it’s not legislated doesn’t mean you don’t have to do it. Think about the longevity of your organization. And then, look, the final C word doesn’t actually apply in a lot of countries. It applies here, thank goodness, and that is compliance. Whereas I know that a lot of listeners today won’t have that card to play. But if you can get your head around the costs, the culture, and maintaining competitive in this market, then you’ve got a fairly good business case. But like anything, Eric, a lot of companies won’t do something unless they have to do it. And that’s just age-old human learning.

Isn’t it? Unfortunately, yes.

Yeah, I know. And it’s not a pleasant thing, but I’m not going to call it for anything else that it’s not. But yeah. So, if you can focus on the first three Cs, for those of you that are based in Australia, and for those that are based in Australia, you’ve definitely got the compliance card now. So, director, how about we keep you out of prison and do stuff? Which tends to work. Yeah. It tends to be a hefty stick. 

Yes, absolutely. So, Anna, thank you so much for coming on the show, sharing your insights. I think it’s a critically important topic, both for safety professionals and for leaders’ organizations in general, to really start looking at psychological safety, overall mental health and well-being. As you talked about the psychosocial different concepts. I hear more and more people talking about psychological safety. Not enough on the psychosocial side of the equation. I think it’s really important to touch on those topics. If somebody wants to reach out to you to get more insights, to have you present at a conference, how can they do that?

Well, strap yourself in because I’m pretty loud and pretty proud.

Perfect. Thank you so much, Anna.

My pleasure, Eric.

Thank you for listening to the Safety Guru on C-suite Radio. Leave a legacy, distinguish yourself from the pack, grow your success. Capture the hearts and minds of your teams. Elevate your safety. Like every successful athlete, top leaders continuously invest in their safety leadership with an expert coach to boost safety performance. Begin your journey at execsafetycoach.com. Come back in two weeks for the next episode with your host, Eric Michrowski. This podcast is powered by Propulo Consulting.

ABOUT THE GUEST

Anna Feringa is an award-winning International Speaker, Author, Trainer and Workplace Mental Health Consultant. She is a leading expert in topics including Psychosocial Health & Safety, Leadership Capability, Injury Management and best practice workplace Mental Health. As a respected member of global HSE, Anna was recently recognised as a Global Top 10 Health and Safety Influencer, 2020 and voted LinkedIn Top Voice for Workplace Mental Health in 2022.

With over 18-years’ consulting experience, Anna supports employers by helping them see that embracing Mental Health in the workplace can help prevent injury and drive a great culture. She helps Australian businesses transition from fearful and confused, to confident and responsive when faced with Mental Health challenges in the workplace.

For more information: www.annaferinga.com.au or https://www.linkedin.com/in/annaferinga/.

STAY CONNECTED

The Safety Guru with Eric Michrowski

More Episodes: https://thesafetyculture.guru/

C-Suite Radio: https://c-suitenetwork.com/the-safety-guru/

Powered By Propulo Consulting: https://propulo.com/

Eric Michrowski: https://ericmichrowski.com

RELATED EPISODE

EXECUTIVE SAFETY COACHING

Like every successful athlete, top leaders continuously invest in their Safety Leadership with an expert coach to boost safety performance.

Safety Leadership coaching has been limited, expensive, and exclusive for too long.

As part of Propulo Consulting’s subscription-based executive membership, our coaching partnership is tailored for top business executives that are motivated to improve safety leadership and commitment.
Unlock your full potential with the only Executive Safety Coaching for Ops & HSE leaders available on the market.
Explore your journey with Executive Safety Coaching at https://www.execsafetycoach.com.
Executive Safety Coaching_Propulo

Mental Health in the Workplace Post COVID-19: Impacts on Safety with Dr. Madison Hanscom

LISTEN TO THE EPISODE: 

ABOUT THE EPISODE

Dr. Madison Hanscom shares some alarming recent research on Mental Health in the Workplace through the current COVID-19 context. She touches on the impacts on Worker Safety and provides some tangible strategies that organizations can implement to support in difficult and challenging times. This is such a critical topic that is too often missing from the Safety and Executive dialogue. This episode of the Safety Guru also touches on individual strategies that can help leaders and listeners in addition to the broader organizational context. Listen in!

READ THIS EPISODE

Real leaders leave a legacy. They capture the hearts and minds of their teams; their origin story puts the safety and well-being of their people first. Great companies ubiquitously have safe yet productive operations. For those companies, safety is an investment, not a cost for the C-Suite. It’s a real topic of daily focus. This is The Safety Guru with your host Eric Michrowski, a globally recognized Ops and The Safety Guru public speaker and author. Are you ready to leave a safety legacy? Your legacy success story begins now.

Hi, I’m Eric Michrowski and welcome to The Safety Guru today. I’m very excited to have Dr. Madison Hanscom with us, who’s going to talk to us about a really important topic in these critical times where we’re starting to emerge from the current covid-19 Black Swan event. A topic we want to talk about is around mental health and mental health in the workplace, particularly in this new context that we’re in medicine. Thank you so much for joining us. I’d love to hear a little bit about how you got into work on safety.

What’s passionate about the topic for you.

Yeah, thanks for having me, Eric. I yeah, I first got into worker safety in graduate school. I did my Ph.D. in psychology that stands for industrial and organizational psychology, which is a study of human behavior and psychology in the workplace. And while I was in grad school, I was offered to complete a concentration in occupational health psychology. And so, I did this and I was a trainee with the math, which is the Mountains and Plains Research Center, which is a NILESH funded research center. And it was history ever since they taught me so much about worker health, worker safety and all the evidence-based approaches behind making the workplace safer for everyone. And that if that’s my passion right there, making the workplace better, improving the workplace for everyone, that’s excellent.

So, what’s the current state when it comes to mental health, particularly in light of all the recent events?

So, well, studies and polls are coming out showing that we have more mental health issues in 20, 20 than in previous years, people are experiencing a lot of emotional distress. There’s a study that came out recently showing that compared to twenty eighteen, those sampled this year in twenty were eight times more likely to fit the criteria for serious mental illness. And it also showed that some groups are struggling more than others. So, in that twenty eighteen survey, only four percent of individuals between the ages of 18 and 29 reported serious mental distress, whereas in twenty-eight the same group was much higher.

It was at 38 percent, pretty bad. And this is also similar for people in their 30s and early 40s, too. But those differences were just a tiny, less tiny, bit less different. But so that group 18 to 29 is really standing out. And it’s especially true for those who have younger kids at home. So, they passed out the sample to look at those with kids and those without. And there’s another gap there as well. So other polls are showing really big numbers to those.

A recent Kaiser Family Foundation poll showing that fifty six percent of US adults reported that stress related to the covid outbreak has caused them to experience negative that negative effects on their well-being and mental health. So, this is like issues sleeping, increased alcohol abuse, worsening chronic conditions. And these numbers are worse for frontline workers and their families, as well as those who have experienced some type of income loss. So, it’s really kind of looking at those groups who are suffering frontline workers, those with income loss and those who are just trying to juggle everything and have kids at home.

Wow. That’s really horrible, horrible news to hear in this context, because there’s just layering all sorts of different complexities into the workplace, into people’s overall well-being through this pretty significant crisis. So clearly, we have a problem. What does it mean for workplace workplaces and for safety specifically?

Yeah, so it definitely spills over. Right, so when people are experiencing stress at home or experiencing stress at work, there’s an opportunity for it to kind of spill into the over into the other domain. I mean, like when you have this full bucket and one, it just has to go somewhere. So, for one prolonged stress alone, it’s highly related to other issues down the road, like cardiovascular disease or obesity, sleep problems, concentration impairment, things like that.

So clearly, these things are all influencing occupational safety and worker’s comp claims, especially those things like sleep and memory impairment. They’re highly related to safety incidents. And we all know when your minds on the job, this can lead to safety issues. So, of course, it’s good to consider ways you can support employees during this time. It’s the right thing to do and it’s also a good business decision.

I completely agree with you. And we have to really also remember how much people have on their shoulders right now and how it can influence their minds at work, particularly when it comes to the impact on focus. When it comes to safety, I would imagine this has a significant impact. So now let’s shift to people who are working remotely, working from home. One thing that I keep wondering is why there are more mental health issues with so many people are teleworking, which we hear makes them happier.

Yeah, so it seems kind of contradictory, right, so you’re right on both accounts, fretwork does make people pretty happy, though, to contrast that many people are not doing their best right now in terms of mental health. So, I don’t have the perfect answer to that question, of course, because people are still kind of collecting data and really understanding what’s happening this year. But what I would imagine a huge variable, what the circumstances are that when people are working from home right now, the conditions are not ideal.

I’ve spoken with a great number of individuals working from home with their kids, for instance, and it’s just totally not a normal situation. Typically, when people are working from home, they would only be working. They’re not also focusing on home schooling. Their kids are stressing out about their husband who lost his job and covid, or stressing out about getting sick or not having paper or wondering if their jobs are going to be there tomorrow and things like that.

So, the uncertainty around everything is just not helpful.

And I would say even from some of the people I’ve spoken to, not everybody has a proper working environment for work. I mean, I spoke to some people that were in the midst of renovations as it started. So, they didn’t even have our house or a kitchen, others who never really worked from home. So, they never had a proper desk. So, they’re working off the kitchen table or off a sofa. So, ergonomics is bad. But I’m sure there’s also a lot of stresses at home as well.

I’ve been hearing stories just like that. Yeah, it’s difficult just to completely transition without warning and all of a sudden, your whole work life looks completely different.

Absolutely. Because when I first started doing remote work, it was an intentional choice. Right. So, I’d invested in the right that’s the right ergonomic setups, the right environment. So even the choice of House was conducive to do this type of work. I’m sure that isolation also is not helping. Can you maybe double click on this a little bit as well?

Oh, exactly. Studies have shown that remote work can lead to perceptions of professional isolation and loneliness in general for some people. And right now, with social distancing, it’s completely amplified. So, yeah, I would say that’s a huge factor contributing to all of this distress as well. People are really social animals. We need each other. We need to be surrounded by other people. And the fact that so many individuals who are used to being surrounded by other people at work every day are now sent home and they’re sent to work from home.

But then on top of that, they can’t hang out with their family and friends as much as usual because of the whole pandemic situation. So, it’s been really hard on people, I’m sure.

And some of the coping mechanisms that people had with challenges they had in their personal lives as well before are not as easily accessible as well. So, I’m completely convinced. Absolutely. Mental health is a critical point right now, a critical point of discussion that organizations need to have internally. Also know it’s a good business decision to be concerned about the well-being of your employees. I’ve alluded to it before in terms of the impact of mental health, in terms of ability to focus on the job at hand, which is then also going to keep you safe or not safe.

Right. Because if you’re not able to have all you focus on the work in front of you, you’re more likely to get injured and it can be a split-second decision. Let’s think a little bit about what leaders can do for their employees. Can you share maybe some thoughts on that?

Yeah, great, so if you’re a leader or any type of supervisory position are definitely things you should think about. I love the analogy that we wear personal protective equipment to deal with physical hazards. But right now, we also need to be thinking about mental acuity. So, we need to be dealing with invisible hazards we can’t see. And first and foremost, as a leader, it’s so important to prioritize your own mental health, so similar to how you put on your oxygen mask before helping others on an airplane.

You should take care of your mental health in order to best help others, because if you are struggling psychologically, it’s likely you’re not as effective as a leader. You might be struggling, being perceptive or empathetic towards your own employees. So, you have to make sure that you’re doing OK first. And this really pays off because, you know, and Eric, when we talk about good leadership, something we talk about so often is role modeling. So, when you’re acting is a role model for good mental health practices.

This goes a long way because it signals to employees what’s important and what they should care about. And it also helps to break down the stigma, which is actually the next one I would want to touch on is removing the stigma around mental health as much as possible. And it can be tough. But, you know, it’s all about letting your employees know that it’s accepted and it’s encouraged to discuss and prioritize your mental health. One way you can encourage them to think about their own mental health is to let them know you take care of yours, too.

So, you know, connecting with them with the resources to can be a good way to touch base about it. Something else I would recommend is to build a culture that supports recovery. Recovery and downtime are really important for happy and productive workers. And you can take this kind of a step further by thinking about it. What are you doing to build that climate around recovery? So, for example, there’s an APA study showing that companies that encourage people to take their vacation, their vacation time and to disconnect during that time have employees who come back feeling much more motivated, more productive than companies who are not really encouraging, or those companies that kind of make employees feel guilty about taking time off.

And the next thing I would suggest, considering is offering a lot of empathy and active care at work. People really like it when you take a genuine interest in them. Remember to check in with your employees regularly about their life outside of work and try to track their experiences so you can kind of celebrate victories with them or grieve losses. Something I really like to remember is let’s say you have an employee who has a mom in the hospital or somebody who has something really exciting with maybe give have a child graduating.

It’s really easy just to set a calendar reminder for that or to have like a little journal where you jot those things down and then you can know when to reach out to someone to circle back around and things like that being there. Yeah. And the next thing is making sure you offer as much schedule flexibility as you can. And I totally understand this is not applicable to all jobs, but, if possible, try and structure work and deliverables to accommodate the possibility that life might interfere with work, especially right now.

Everybody needs something different. Some are caring for young kids. Some are caring for old parents. Some just want their normal schedule back. So as much as possible, just giving people flexibility and control over how their work is done is going to really help people balance everything. And I know have gone on for a long time. But I guess the last thing I’ll mention here is something really useful for those working remotely now is understanding boundary management. So, this is all just about checking in with your employees so you can help them build a schedule and an environment that supports the work for them to feel productive, refreshed, happy, all those things and let them know that it’s all right if their preferences are kind of different from your own.

For instance, if you like to send emails at 10 p.m., but this is out of normal work hours for your company, reassure them that there’s no need to respond to the next day, that you just like checking in on the evening, because the whole idea here is to reassure people that they’re not on the hook for a twenty-four-hour workday when they’re working from home because we’re all human and we need to rest.

Great, great points and potentially even possessing a delayed send, which I’m not necessarily notoriously good at doing, but you can now schedule that your email to go at a later time. So those are great tips for leaders. What if somebody isn’t a leader and they’re curious about things that they can do for themselves or potentially even a loved one?

Yeah, yeah, so that’s a good one and I’ll start with an interesting one, which is stick it out in nature more because more and more research is coming out to support the fact that nature is really good for us. Something as simple as going for a walk is really good for stress relief. And spending time outside improves our ability to focus and is really good for our physical health, too. So, if you live somewhere where it’s safe and easy to go out on a walk, maybe without running into huge groups of people, I would go ahead and get out there.

And let’s say that’s not an option for you or you’re not comfortable doing that. Maybe try bringing nature into your living space. So, research also shows that moving light patterns like, you know, when the sun comes in through your window, through a through tree branches and stuff like that, or it’s really calling to our heart rate, keeps us focused. Maybe hang out on your porch more often or closer to windows, open the windows, things like that.

It can really kind of light in your day and help to regain your focus there. And I know a lot of people are trying to reconnect, reconnect with nature right now.

Right. I can imagine. I remember reading specifically, even within nature. There was something about walking in a forest that was even more impactful and I can’t remember what it was, but that between walking nature by a lake as an example versus Infowars, that apparently there is something about trees and the smell of the forest that was even better, also helpful for from a creativity standpoint that shows up in a lot of the creativity, creativity, literature as well. 

Yeah. And then the less manmade stuff you can be around, the better. So that makes perfect sense. And yeah. So, the next thing you can do for yourself is to limit screen time. So that’s also related to nature and kind of to limit news intake. And I mean, this kind of speaks for itself. Spending too much time engaging in media coverage through polarizing stories. You can kind of just be a stressor on its own. And.

Shifting to another concept here is remembering to support one another, so of course, this is really fundamental to mental health, but it’s all about reaching out and checking in with your coworkers, ask them about how they are doing outside of work and make this a regular habit, not just a onetime thing that you do or a onetime reference you. Yeah, you really need to think about the nuances associated with your culture to say, are you working in a Macho or kind of a male dominated culture? And I say this because there are certain industries like this where people suffer silently more often. And we know suicide rates are high for industries that are dominated by men like construction. So, it’s important that you kind of reach out and check in with how your coworkers are doing, because you might make a huge difference in someone’s life by doing that.

Great point. I remember construction came up, firemen, police officers, all professions where there’s a much, much higher suicide rate. And it reminds me of a bit of a theme in Austria. They did some really good campaigns around this topic and it was introducing a simple word, which was, are you OK in introducing the common language within organizations to encourage check in at key points throughout the day and over a period of time, just really reinforcing that?

Yeah, I think that’s really related because along similar lines, you shouldn’t suffer silently either. If you were having a difficult time, speak up and ask for support or help or try advocating for yourself independently. That makes more sense in your scenario by maybe speaking out some resources like therapy or someone you trust. And too many people suffer silently and really wish that they’d done something sooner. So, I can just really make or break your experience. And finally, I save this one for last because it’s extremely important.

 

Yeah, it seems really obvious to people and it’s to focus on health care. So, you know, even though it’s obvious it’s the first thing to slip through the cracks when things get stressful. But so much research supports the fact that a good routine, eating well, sleeping eight hours a night can hugely impact your success and your mental health. So, yeah, even though you’re probably rolling your eyes at this obvious one, I have to put it in here because it’s such a good reminder that so many of us need, especially because if we fall off the wagon, things just get really hard.

Thank you. That’s really good feedback, really good recommendations and ideas for everyone. So, what if somebody is wanted to seek some therapy, some support, but isn’t comfortable leaving the home, given everything that’s happening? Any thoughts about virtual therapy around this?

Yeah, that’s a great, great thought. So, telehealth has definitely shown to be effective and people should look into that if they think it would be helpful for their stress or their anxiety or anything going on right now. And one example of a company doing telehealth well right now is better help. And it’s worked well for a lot of people.

Accent is definitely a much better idea to seek out now and do it remotely rather than putting it off. I’d like to wrap up our conversation by talking about burnout. It comes up often in conversations. I recently had a question from a webinar attendee who’s worried about burnout on her team. She said she supervises a team that has intense workload right now because of covid-19 changes, and she’s getting word about burnout. It’s clear her team members are feeling overwhelmed, like there isn’t an end in sight.

What would you tell her?

Yeah, it’s definitely a hot topic right now, and her concerns are a good one, especially because if it’s true that her team is feeling burned out, there’s a lot of long-term negative consequences because burnout is deep, it’s pervasive. It comes after a lot of prolonged stress and it really affects job performance and affects everything down to the bottom line in the company. So, thinking about productivity is a smart idea. And to start the tips that I kind of discussed for leaders, for individuals are all good for burnout.

So, I would think about those. But I would also think specifically about the stressors and your specific work environment and what you can do to build resources to meet the demands. This will really depend on the job and the nature of the work. But an example of this might be to think about how things have changed lately in terms of workload. So, let’s say your team is used to producing 15 reports a week, but now it’s up to 20.

It might be a good idea to introduce some type of resource for this new demand, like it might be adding another employee to the team to distribute the load, maybe hire an intern or build more flexible deadlines or just something else that will help to reduce the stress. Because if things are changing and they’re not going away, there has to be something in place to help to adapt to that. And along similar lines, when things get really overwhelming, like there isn’t an end in sight.

It reminds me of some research that’s been done showing that when people feel underwater, it works really well when we give them bite sized bowls or small wins, because when you’re drowning in a ton of long-term uncertainty, it’s so easy to lose sight of goals. And psychologically, we love my goals to keep us motivated. They keep us engaged. So even though there might be long term goals associated with getting the company recovered or whatever, it might be used to break these down as much as possible.

It helps people connect what they’re doing every day to something bigger, to the bigger picture. And so, some people have done this with white boards, like in hospitals, like with daily wins and progress charts and things like that. But this can also be done virtually, too, if your team is remote right now as well. So just something to think about, like really breaking things up as much as possible.

That’s phenomenal. Just if I may, unless I have two other tiny questions, which I’m hoping you might be able to expand on a little bit at first. One is I’m wondering if you noticed this, somebody around you. So, you talked a little bit about what can I do as a leader? What can I do if I think I want to seek some help? What should you do if you see somebody around you that seems to be exhibiting signs?

What should be your role? Should you reach up to somebody? Should you have a conversation with them? I know you’re not a clinical psychologist, but that’s a topic that’s come up a few times in conversations with people in terms of if I notice something that seems off, somebody is not acting like they normally do, what should I do?

Yeah, I think I think it’ll of course, it’ll kind of depend on the nature of the relationship that you have with this person. But, you know, if you feel close enough to this individual, I would recommend going and talking to them first yourself, because you don’t want to put them on blast in any way and you don’t want to talk to their supervisor or kind of go around them in any way. I would just approach them really kind of on a friendly level.

You don’t even have to approach him as a coworker. And maybe if they don’t open up immediately, just give them just let them know that you’re there to talk. And I know every situation is going to be different, but just being there for someone can really go a long way.

So even just checking and saying, are you OK? How are you feeling? I notice you seem more tired or more whatever the symptom might be. Would that be a good approach?

Yeah, I think it would, yeah.

Lastly, at the front end, you talked a little bit about some demographics that were hit harder. So specifically, those, I believe, under the age of twenty-nine, as well as kind of more front-line workers. Any thoughts around intervention approaches or would you keep it agnostic of that? Because it seems like there’s definitely a bigger impact on within certain population groups. And I’m wondering if there’s any research that shows the why behind it or even if there’s a different tactic around those groups.

Yeah, and I think a big reason why these groups are struggling so much when you look at these different surveys, when you’re looking at this data, is because of those factors such as job loss, younger people are more likely to use or lose their jobs right now. They are more likely to have children at home or younger children. Having older children at home is not as stressful. So, I think I think thinking about things like that and, you know, my default is whenever you’re going to offer resources or you’re going to offer interventions, my default is to make it equally accessible for all employees because you never know who is going to want it and you never know who’s going to benefit from it.

So, it’s a good idea to make it accessible for everyone. But if you are going to kind of target interventions for certain people or reach out to see if anybody needs support, you know, the numbers show those groups definitely could use that support.

Interesting. Well, thank you very much for your time and for sharing some great ideas, this is such an important topic that is not getting as much attention as it should. And there’s so much that leader can do. Those resources you can draw from. You’ve talked about a few of them, a lot of employee assistance programs within organizations also have some support resources and sometimes some webinars or speakers that can come speak to the organization. So many resources out there, but thank you so much for talking about such an important topic.

Thanks for having me.

Thank you for listening to The Safety Guru on C-Suite radio. Leave a legacy, distinguish yourself from the pack, grow your success, capture the hearts and minds of your team’s. Fuel your future. Come back in two weeks for the next episode or listen to our sister show with the Ops guru Eric Michrowski.

For more on Workplace Mental Health and Safety: https://www.propulo.com/blog/category/safety/mental-health/

Please join our upcoming Webinar: Stress, burnout and loneliness with Dr Madison Hanscom on Jul 16, 2020 12:00 PM EDT at:

2020 has been a difficult year, and the impact is reflected in the recent increase of mental health issues. The implications are widespread — mental wellbeing is a critical business success factor.

Join Madison Hanscom (PhD, Chief Science Officer) with host Eric Michrowski (CEO, Leader, Public Speaker, and Podcast Host) for a webinar to discuss the issues and resolutions. We will explore the impact of stress, burnout, and loneliness on your employees and company. Strategies to prevent and cope with stress, burnout, and loneliness during these challenging times will be offered.

https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/4748711963347660045

ABOUT THE GUEST

Madison uses her expertise in organizational science to diagnose problems and build solutions. With years of experience in applied research, Madison uses her knowledge in statistics and research methods to design and administer assessments in the areas of safety culture and operational excellence. Madison enjoys translating data for practical use and working with clients to create better workplaces. In her role, Madison manages the Science Team, Propulo’s division for academic and research partnerships. Madison and the Science Team ensure the practices and products at Propulo are evidence-based by translating empirical research into practical application. 

Prior to joining Propulo, Madison has received several awards for applied research, and her research programs have been funded by NIOSH. She has authored publications focused on best practices for performance appraisal and performance management, occupational safety, aging and diversity at work, and more. Madison has also worked on multidisciplinary teams to diagnose problems and produce transformative organizational solutions in the areas of safety culture, psychometrics, leadership, employee motivation and engagement, and more in a variety of industries.

Madison holds a Ph.D. and M.S. in Industrial and Organizational Psychology with an emphasis in Occupational Health Psychology from Colorado State University.

STAY CONNECTED

The Safety Guru with Eric Michrowski

More Episodes: https://thesafetyculture.guru/

C-Suite Radio: https://c-suitenetwork.com/the-safety-guru/

Powered By Propulo Consulting: https://propulo.com/

Eric Michrowski: https://ericmichrowski.com

RELATED EPISODES