Select Page

REDI for Work: A Simple Framework to Start the Right Conversations Before Risk Is Introduced with Dr. E. Kevin Kelloway

REDI for Work: A Simple Framework to Start the Right Conversations Before Risk Is Introduced with Dr. E. Kevin Kelloway

LISTEN TO THE EPISODE: 

ABOUT THE EPISODE

We’re thrilled to welcome back Dr. E. Kevin Kelloway, Professor of Psychology and Management at Saint Mary’s University, to The Safety Guru for a powerful conversation on the critical role of work readiness and the simple yet impactful REDI framework for creating safer workplaces. In this insightful episode, Dr. Kelloway introduces the REDI model, a practical, human-centered approach to assessing work readiness through four key factors: Rested, Emotionally Calm, Distracted, and Impatient/In a hurry. When people are not fully ready for the task at hand, the risk of errors and incidents can rise, especially in high-risk environments. Dr. Kelloway explains how each element of the model influences safety outcomes and decision-making. Through real-world examples, he shares how leaders and teams can apply this framework in practice to spark meaningful conversations before risk is introduced. Tune in to explore how organizations can use this straightforward framework to strengthen safety culture, increase awareness, and create safer workplaces by ensuring every team member is truly REDI for the work ahead.

READ THE EPISODE

Real leaders leave a legacy. They capture the hearts and minds of their teams. Their origin story puts the safety and well-being of their people first. Great companies ubiquitously have safe, yet productive operations. For those companies, safety is an investment, not a cost for the C-suite. It’s a real topic of daily focus. This is the Safety Guru with your host, Eric Michrowski, a globally recognized ops and safety guru, public speaker and author. Are you ready to leave a safety legacy? Your legacy success story begins now.

Hi, and welcome to the Safety Guru. Today, I’m very excited to have with me Dr. Kevin Kelloway. He’s a university research Professor with St. Mary’s University, who also works with the CN Center of Occupational Health and Safety. Kevin has been back, was on our show previously with great story recording on SAFER, some key ideas in terms of what does what does good leadership look like and how can you improve step by step. Really excited to have Kevin join us again today. Kevin, welcome to the show. Very excited.

Thanks, Eric. Glad to be here.

Today, we have a really interesting topic, which We’ll get to it very soon in terms of where we can assess and get a sense as to how people are ready for work, essentially, in terms of capability. But before we get there, Kevin, can you maybe share a little bit about yourself and your background how you got passionate about safety?

Sure. I guess in a way, I’ve always been interested in safety. I grew up in a small coal mining town in Cape Breton, and all of my uncles virtually every male in the family, worked in the pit. So, there were always stories about accidents or incidents or safety hazards in the pit. And of course, there were some explosions and fires. So that gets you interested. And then when I showed up in my first jobs, I guess maybe being sensitized to safety, you start to recognize some of the things going around you. I worked my main job When I was younger, I worked in a psychiatric hospital, so there’s lots of violence and issues around that. So always interested in safety. And then as I got into graduate school and doing my PhD and then subsequently work as a researcher, that’s one of the topics I keep coming back to, because I think this is an area where we really need evidence-based practice. We obviously need to address safety issues, but we need to address them in ways that are actually effective. I think it’s too easy for us to fall into the easy solution. But maybe if we run everybody a training course, then everything will be okay.

I’m willing to believe that’s the case, but I want to see some data backing that up. Right.

Maybe if we start out a little bit with the background behind this idea of Daily Fitness for Work and your ready model?

Sure. It’s really a subject I’ve stayed away from. I think many of us have stayed away from because you never want to be blaming the victim. You never want to be saying to someone who’s injured that this is your fault because you did something wrong. But we were approached by an organization a couple of years ago that did very safety-sensitive work, and they worked in high-risk environments. And they were interested in the notion that people are not machines. We don’t show to work the same way every day. So sometimes we have issues going on in our life that distract us or worry us, or maybe we didn’t get enough sleep that night or whatever it is. But just on any given day, we might be off our game. And we’re still well-trained and we’re still highly skilled, and we know what we’re doing. And many times, we can just overcome that. We’re a little tired, so we’re a little distracted, so we’ll try to be a little more careful that day. But the organization was interested in the notion of, sometimes we show up and we’re so tired and we’re so out of whack that maybe we really shouldn’t be doing that work.

Sure.

And they wanted people to have the ability to self-assess that and also the ability to go to their supervisor and say, Listen, here’s what’s going on, and I shouldn’t be doing this work today.

Sure.

And supervisor is an intern given the authority to respond to that by saying, okay, well, let’s rotate you out, and we’ll bring someone else in, and we’ll find something else for you to do this day. Right. And obviously, that That can’t be an ongoing thing. If it is, then we’re going to have another conversation. That’s why you’re doing. But just recognize that on any given day, there are things you should not be doing because you’re not ready.

Can you walk us maybe in terms of what you found as you were looking at the research in this space? Because I think we love the simplicity of it is you can teach somebody to self-assess, but also as a leader, you can get a sense as to what should I be looking for, what signs could I be looking for?

As we looked at the literature, there’s all kinds of things you can focus on. Of course, we research on personality and safety, and there’s certainly a lot on substance use and things like that. But these are things we know and presumably have some procedures in place. So, we were looking for those things that change every day or vary every day. So, one obvious one is sleep. So, we use the acronym ready, our EDI, and R is rested. If you’re doing anything with increased risk, you want to be well-rested. And there’s just a ton of research data out there on the effects of lack of sleep or poor-quality sleep on all kinds of outcomes, but especially on paying attention on the safety outcomes. There’s some research that says even if we miss 40 minutes of sleep, we’re more likely to experience safety the next day. We just went through the setting our clocks ahead. That’s always a discussion at this time of year that you may be at increased risk afterwards. One of One of the things is we want to be well-rested. If you’re showing up, especially if you’re going to do something of a higher risk than normal, that’s something you want to ensure is that you’re well-rested or employees are well-rested.

We may not be able to ensure that. We can’t tell people to be in bed by 8: 30.

No.

We can’t control their sleep, but we can certainly watch for signs of fatigue or people who just seem off the game. Even for us in our everyday life, if we to do something as common place as driving our car, if we’re planning a long trip, you want to make sure you’re well-rested before you do that. Ours for rested. We also found quite a bit of literature linking stress and emotional offsets to safety outcomes. So, we say people have to be emotionally calm. That’s our hope. So, you don’t want people doing high-risk work when they’re under a lot of stress or they’re feeling a lot of anxiety, or they’re just being bothered by something. Maybe the stressors we all know, like work overload or being harassed at work or something like that. All of these things are associated negatively with safety outcomes. Yeah. So again, some of those thing’s organizations can control, some of them you can’t control. Sometimes the stress is emanating from outside the workplace. Maybe there’s a problem in your marriage or your child got hit by a car and they’re in the hospital. Things are, of course, upsetting, and they may throw you off your game for that day.

Again, most of the time, we experience these things. Sometimes it’s fairly minor stuff. And we’re, again, well trained, we’re competent, and we can overcome those sorts of things. Maybe some days where it’s just, we really shouldn’t do that.

Right.

I knew a guy many years ago who was a printer. He ran a printing press. And one of the organizational hazards of running a printing press is you can lose fingers very easily.

Unfortunately, yes.

He was fortunate in that he was… When I knew him, he was self-employed. If he was really upset someday or had missed a lot of sleep, he just would not run the press that day.

Sure.

And I remember asking him about this, and this is how you make your living. How do you not run your press? And in answer, he just held up his 10 fingers and waggled and said, this is why I don’t run the press. I have 10, and I plan to keep 10. So, he was recognizing that days he’s off his game or maybe days he shouldn’t be doing something.

Sure.

High risk. So, rest it emotionally calm. We want people not to be distracted, which is very unique. So, when people are distracted, we’re worried about other things, we’re thinking about other things. Again, it doesn’t detract from our skill or our knowledge. It’s just we’re not really paying attention. That’s the time we might not recognize, for example, when something has changed in the environment.

Which is a very common one because we are very bad at spotting a change that’s occurring in front of us.

Right. You’re doing what always do and not recognizing that something has changed. That can be a serious problem when we’re talking about safety outcomes. Most of us recognize if we’re distracted, that’s the time you make Psychologists refer to them as cognitive errors or sometimes slips and lapses, so you dial the wrong phone number. I remember years ago when I was a child, my mother was upset about something, but she was making supper. We had people coming for dinner, and she made a lemon meringue pie, but she put salt in the meringue instead of sugar. I’m sure it was very tasty. My mother had three sons who never let her live that down. But again, later I realized that’s an almost perfect example of a cognitive error from distraction. She was thinking about something else, not really paying attention to what she was doing, even though she knew very well what she was doing. Right. So rested, emotionally calm, not distracted, and not impatient or not in a hurry. And although it makes sense, I hadn’t seen a lot of this in the research literature, so I was actually quite surprised when we started looking into the research literature and seeing across a wide variety of industries, how often being in a hurry is identified as a cause of incidents and injuries in the workplace.

Right. And anecdotally, we hear it all the time. People say, well, I just wanted to get this done, and it was only going to take a minute, so I didn’t bother getting my safety gear, or I didn’t bother taking these precautions, or whatever. On a low level, when we recognize that we’re in patient or in a hurry, that’s the time we want to tell ourselves, Okay, slow down. That’s true. But from an organizational perspective, that’s the time a supervisor might notice people who are visibly frustrated because things are going well or going fast enough, and they’re trying to compensate by working faster. That’s the time you might want to step in and say, Now’s the time for a break. Now’s Most of the time to just slow down, take a breath, think about it. Yeah. That’s the model we came up with. It’s all based on research evidence. We can find the studies to show that being rested, being emotionally calm, not distracted, not in a hurry, that defines when we’re ready to do the work safely.

Sure.

This episode of the Safety Guru podcast is brought to you by Propulo Consulting, the leading safety and safety culture advisory firm. Whether you are looking to assess your safety culture, develop strategies to level up your safety performance, introduce human performance capabilities, re-energize your BBS program, enhance supervisory safety capabilities, or introduce unique safety leadership training and talent solutions, Propulo has you covered. Visit us at Propulo,com.

How can it be applied? Because when you work through every step of your ready model, I see automatically some elements of as a team member, I can recognize the signs of this, so I can speak up, as you mentioned before, if I’m not ready for work. But there’s also a split side of what the organization can do. When I think about rest, the organization controls shifts, controls over time, how to schedule around your circadian cycle, which can impact sleep quality. The individual side is, I can teach you how to sleep, the sleep hygiene things that you can do around how you sleep and how you improve your sleep quality. Even in terms of when you talk about the eye in terms of being impatient, in a hurry, it could also be production pressure, the organization is pushing, go faster, or a target we need to meet, which could be real and could be present, or it could even be internalized, where I’m putting pressure on myself because I want to succeed.

Yeah. There are different levels there. Certainly, we were thinking of this originally as a model for self-assessment, where if you’re going out to do something that’s high risk, maybe that’s the time you want to do a quick check in with yourself. Am I calm? Am I well-rested? Am I focused and on task? Am I going to take my time and do this right? But we also think there’s an organizational role. So originally, when we were approached about this by an organization, what they wanted really is for employees to have the ability to go to their supervisor and say, this is not the day I should be doing that task, and that the supervisor could respond. So that’s at the extreme level. But as you point out, the organizations can manage a lot of these things. We already know that certainly organizations should be managing stressors in the environment, at least in terms of minimizing the hassles people have at work. And if there’s harassment going on or things like that, we should be dealing with that. Organizations, they can enforce sleep regimes on people, but they certainly can… There’s an educational role here. Many organizations run programs on sleep hygiene and being well-rested and things like that. 

So, we can influence that. As you say, we can look at our shift schedules. And that’s not an area I’m a great expert on, but one of the things that’s always stuck with me is when we change shifts makes a difference. And it’s often the case that because of the way our lives are structured and the way we are, we all tend to go to bed at the same time every night. But it’s the same time, whether we have to get up at 5: 00 in the morning or 10: 00 in the morning, they’ll go to bed at the same time. Obviously, one of the implications for that is you can help people get more sleep by simply making the shift change later in the day. So maybe shifts don’t have to change at, say, seven in the morning. They can change at nine in the morning, and then people will get that extra hour sleep or whatever. So, there are things that you like tweaks like that, that are going to affect how well-rested people are. There’s some education we can do. We can work on minimizing stressors in the workplace, and we can certainly help people with stress management and things like that.

That doesn’t replace minimizing stressors in the workplace. Yeah, of course. It can certainly help. And we can also, as supervisors, we can just be aware and monitoring, looking for signs that people are not up to their normal standard. Certainly, if you see people making a lot of little mistakes or having to do things twice or three times or forgetting things, those are all signs that maybe someone’s under a lot of stress. It could be something totally different. I get older, I forget things all the time now. But That would be the cues. In another context, we’ve called these the signs of struggle. That might be the cues that a supervisor could use to go and start that conversation with an employee. Are you feeling, okay? Are you up to this today? Do you want me to find something else for you to do? And things like that.

That requires you having a baseline knowledge of your team. If you actively care about them and you know how they show up on a regular basis, then you can spot the difference. If you’re an absentee leader in your office the whole day, you may not even notice these changes.

Absolutely, yeah. It requires you to be, A, with the team and be aware of the way they normally show up. I talked about the signs of struggle. This was another area we did research on. We were looking for signs that somebody had a mental health crisis going on. But when you look at that, there are some very visible things you see that I think are relevant here. People under a lot of stress or dealing with issues in their own life often withdraw from people socially. You go for coffee with the gang or anything like that where they normally would. When you start seeing absences and decrements in performance. Sometimes people just tell you. Because if somebody’s really exhausted or they’re really stressed out, they will often say that at work. I’m just dead today. I can’t get it together. Things like that. Some of the signs are quite obvious. But again, supervisor has to be there and aware to pick up on them and say, well, maybe this is the time to have a conversation about that. Yeah.

Even in terms of distractions, there’s a fair bit that can be done. We talked briefly around in aviation, how there’s been several crashes over history because of a minor distraction. Light bulb, somebody looking out the window at a beautiful site instead of looking at where they were heading, little details along those lines. There’s a lot that’s also been done to make sure that at key critical moments of the flight, there’s no distractions. Not allowed to have an interaction that’s not related to the mission on takeoff or landing, and nobody can interrupt the pilot for that reason.

Right. So, whenever we can limit things like that, it’s interesting because I would say, think back to when you were learning how to drive, and you were sitting upright with your hands at 10: 00 and 2: 00, and there’s no radio on, and you’re fully focused at the task in the hand. Then after you get your license and some years of experience, now you’re driving down the 401 with one hand and the radios there. Police tell horror stories about things they’ve seen on the highway, people on their laptop or shaving or doing their makeup. People are multitasking like crazy. But some of that’s because our sense of risk has gone down.

Change.

When you first start driving, that’s a very risky endeavor and you need to be totally focused.

Excellent. I really like the simplicity, again, ready as a tool for, I think, leaders to understand How is my team ready for work? But also, like you talked about, for team members to understand what are the things that could get in the way of being safe today and being comfortable speaking up. Like you said, if every day you didn’t sleep because you went out to pub at night, there’s a point where it’s a different conversation, but it’s also making sure we don’t put somebody who’s not ready and well for work to work. I remember talking to one leader, and they shared a really powerful story for me. It was a team member who was showing up for work, and the supervisor was very cognizant of how she normally shows up and realized that on that particular day, she seemed very distracted. He just went said, Are you okay? She says, well, actually, I got evicted last night, so we slept on the street. He says, okay, that’s not the moment to operate the machinery. I think that’s the importance of recognizing those signs. I like the element you’re also bringing up, which is if team members recognize those signs and feel comfortable speaking up, then it can also keep people safer.

Yeah. We’ve talked about supervisors in the individual, but there’s a role there for teammates, too.

Yeah, for sure.

If you recognize that one of your coworkers is not doing well or seems off, or if you see them make a lot of these little mistakes, that might be a time, and it gives you a reason to have that conversation with them.

Kevin, thank you so much for joining me today. If you haven’t listened to the previous episode, I really encourage you to listen to the one we recorded several years back on the safer model. I love the insights there in terms of as a leader, what are the steps we can make to get better and more powerful as a safety leader? I really love the analogy at the time of the 10,000 steps, I remember, and the little meaningful step forward in terms of that difference that you can do. If somebody wants to get in touch with you or the CN Center for Occupational Health and Safety at St. Mary’s, what’s the best way to do that?

Well, certainly, you can drop me an email. It’s first name and last name @smu.ca. So [email protected]. And the CN Center for Occupational Health and Safety, which is a center for research excellence in health and safety, can be reached as [email protected]. Excellent. Those are the easiest ways to reach us.

Perfect. Thank you so much, Kevin.

Thanks, Eric.

Thank you for listening to The Safety Guru on C-suite Radio. Leave a legacy. Distinguish yourself from the past. Grow your success. Capture the hearts and minds of your teams. Elevate your safety. Like every successful athlete, top leaders continuously invest in their safety leadership with an expert coach to boost safety performance. Begin your journey at execsafetycoach.com. Come back in two weeks for the next episode with your host, Eric Michrowski. This podcast is powered by Propulo Consulting.

ABOUT THE GUEST

Dr. E. Kevin Kelloway is the University Research Professor and Professor of Psychology and Management at Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, Nova Scotia. A prolific researcher, he has authored over 200 articles and chapters and has authored/edited 15 books to date.  His research focuses on occupational health psychology and, in particular, how leaders affect health and safety within organizations.  Kevin has been elected a Fellow of the Association for Psychological Science, the Canadian Psychological Association, the International Association for Applied Psychology, and the Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology. In 2016, he served as President of the Canadian Psychological Association. Kevin works with both private and public sector clients on issues related to leadership, safety, and HR management, and is a popular speaker at conferences and corporate events.

For more information: https://www.smu.ca/psychology/faculty-and-staff.html

RELATED EPISODE

STAY CONNECTED

The Safety Guru with Eric Michrowski

More Episodes: https://thesafetyculture.guru/

C-Suite Radio: https://c-suitenetwork.com/the-safety-guru/

Powered By Propulo Consulting: https://propulo.com/

Eric Michrowski: https://ericmichrowski.com

EXECUTIVE SAFETY COACHING

Like every successful athlete, top leaders continuously invest in their Safety Leadership with an expert coach to boost safety performance.

Safety Leadership coaching has been limited, expensive, and exclusive for too long.

As part of Propulo Consulting’s subscription-based executive membership, our coaching partnership is tailored for top business executives that are motivated to improve safety leadership and commitment.
Unlock your full potential with the only Executive Safety Coaching for Ops & HSE leaders available on the market.
Explore your journey with Executive Safety Coaching at https://www.execsafetycoach.com.
Executive Safety Coaching_Propulo

Redefining Safety: Embracing Risk and the Power of Language in Safety Culture with Dave Whitefield

Redefining Safety: Embracing Risk and the Power of Language in Safety Culture with Dave Whitefield

LISTEN TO THE EPISODE: 

ABOUT THE EPISODE

Tune in for a fascinating and thought-provoking conversation with Dave Whitefield, a seasoned safety and risk professional with more than 30 years of industry experience. Dave joins The Safety Guru to discuss the challenges facing the safety industry and why meaningful safety improvement depends less on metrics and more on people and culture. In this episode, Dave explains why embracing risk, rather than trying to eliminate it, is important and how empowering workers to actively manage risk leads to better outcomes than simply enforcing rules. He also shares the role of trust and communication, and how the language we use shapes culture, influences behavior, and impacts how risk is understood and managed. The conversation highlights the vital role of leadership in shifting from correction to learning, and in creating environments where people feel supported to speak up, take ownership, and grow. This episode offers a thoughtful perspective on redefining safety through connection, effective risk management, and meaningful change. Listen now!

READ THE EPISODE

Real leaders leave a legacy. They capture the hearts and minds of their teams. Their origin story puts the safety and well-being of their people first. Great companies ubiquitously have safe yet productive operations. For those companies, safety is an investment, not a cost. For the C suite, it’s a real topic of daily focus. This is the Safety Guru with your host, Eric Michrowski, a globally recognized ops and safety guru, public speaker, and author. Are you ready to leave a safety legacy? Your legacy success story begins now.

Hi and welcome to the Safety Guru. Today I’m very excited to have with me Dave Whitefield. He’s a culture expert in safety and risk. Dave, really excited to have you with me. I’d love to get a little bit of your background, how you got into safety and how you got the passion that you have for safety risk, but also culture. 

Yeah, cool. All right, thank you and thanks, Eric, obviously, for having me on the podcast. I’m very excited. My origin story is that I failed a subject at university and that’s how I got into safety. So, I way back, it wasn’t very many years ago, but in 91, apparently, I was doing an undergraduate psychology degree thinking I would go down that path of maybe like sports psychology or performance psych. And yeah, I failed one of my first-year psych subjects and couldn’t do the second year. And it had this other; the degree was being delivered in a health faculty and had this other major of work and health. And out of about 120th, 20, sorry, 120 who started that year, about 20 of us ended up doing this work and health major and was one of the early tertiary degrees in certainly in Brisbane and I think in Australia at the time. And so, yeah, I kind of got into it by doing that and then struggled to find work. I was a motorbike courier for a year, which was a pretty risky job running around the city.

Yeah, it was ironic. And then basically I got referred in. I’ve always been able to talk as we’ve chatted a little bit, obviously, Eric, but people will tell I can talk. And I got a referral, did some safety training, and I started with that. And so, I’ve been a safety manager a number of times, but I’ve actually worked for myself more than I’ve worked for others. And I’ve been a sort of consultant. I’ve also owned a training business with some others for about eight or nine years, and we grew that. I did a postgrad OHS degree and then I, about 10 years ago finished another postgrad in essentially social Psychology of risk, which was really the thing that helped. I’ve always been in that people side and the risk side. And. But that. That postgrad was, yeah, looking at social psychology as it applies to safety and risk and. And here I am still trying to work out what I want to do when I grow up.

And so, I think it’s a good pivot to understand so. So, what’s holding us back in safety? We’ve had this conversation for.

Yeah, for a little while. Tell me a little bit about what. What’s really holding our ability to progress?

Yeah, it can be a frustrating industry to be in. LinkedIn can be a pretty toxic place, I think, for safety at times. And then within industry, you know, if you went into the workforce, if you go on a supervisor level, particularly, and you, like, go, yeah, let’s make this better by involving the safety department, you know, like said, no one ever, like, it’s. We’ve created a bit of a problem for ourselves. So, on two levels, I think at an industry level, I think we can get better at kind of embracing the idea that there’s multiple disciplines and philosophies within safety. Some of them we’ve been used to, like, hygiene and ergonomics. But the idea that there are systems thinking, legal, behavioral, safety, process, safety culture, which is my focus, there’s sort of sub disciplines, psychosocial, psychological. And I think we can get better at going, what’s the nature of the problem? And therefore, what approach would be better as opposed to. I think what we tend to do is go, oh, I’ve got a fix for that, or I’ve got a solution. And I think part of it is, I think we think as generalists that we have to be able to do everything.

So, like, just the amount. And this happens in Australia, the amount of safety professionals that give legal advice is probably pretty scary because we go, well, yeah, we’ll run a due diligence workshop because we think it fits within the safety realm. But it’s actually, that’s a legal perspective and really should be done through a legal.

So, there’s no legal training in most safety professions.

Yeah, we’re a bit bound up in that. And then obviously some of the other stuff we spoke about, I think that once organizations have got a really good foundation. When I say really good, they’ve got good, basically, hazard and risk management. So good that safety 101 stuff, they understand their hazards and risks. They rarely have surprises and new hazards and risks. They got pretty good stuff. They still have incidents, but they’ve got good Control. They’ve got enough systems, and they’ve probably got too many. Once you’ve got that, the strategies that you’ve been using to do that, you know, you can’t just keep applying them more. And there’s a need to change and. And that’s tricky. I think systems focus is a really attractive thing. It’s reinforced by regulators and auditors, so we get really anchored to that. If I equate it to Hudson’s culture maturity culture spectrum, it’s being in calculative. So, I see that a lot. And then within that, the other thing we spoke about. Sorry, I will get to the point eventually, is that when I go into workplaces, one of the first questions I ask is, what is safety about? And one of the most common responses is it’s something to do with an outcome, preventing harm, preventing injury, which is a challenge.

Going home the same way you arrived. Which it is true, and it should be. It’s just that when that’s all it is in a. At a company level, then that creates problems because it becomes basically, again, whether you got hurt or not, or whether people made it home becomes the quasi sort of definition of safety. And that is a strong anchor that’s hard to break. The irony is it works at a personal level. Like if a manager says it’s really important you all get home, that’s still appropriate because they’re expressing care, which is an input. But when the company basically gets really anchored, and this happens through measuring recordable injury rates. Absolutely all the quantifiable stuff. So, the underlying question that I ask once we’ve surfaced the idea that there’s this really strong anchor, is if everyone gets home for a month, was it safe? And there’s a little bit of silence. You sometimes awkward silence and thinking, and it’s like discomfort.

Right.

And by the way, the answer isn’t definitely yes or no, but it’s like, it could be, but it might not.

Be, it might not be. Right. And this is the part is you measure it. And so many times I’ve seen it where it’s a 10th best year of safety and then something significant happens. Right. Or we’ve had great, great performance around zero harm for years, and then significant events occur. Deepwater Horizon is a perfect example. I think it was seven years of recognition for something that was deeply unsafe. Yeah. By all accounts. But at that point it was called safe.

And there’s this seduction at the company level. And I get why, by the way, they get anchored to love of measurement. I totally. Because the challenge for us is always, well, if not, then what else? Sure. And now this occurred to me, and it could easily be one of these arguments that is entirely in my head. But I think what happened about 30 or 40 years ago when we were recognizing that outcome measures lost time, injury rates, recordable rates were not appropriate. The question that was asked was, okay, well if we’re not measuring that, what else should we measure? And that’s how we came to measure inputs. Now measuring that’s fine. Setting KPIs and setting targets around it, that creates trade-offs, usually with quality, quantity.

100%. Yep.

But I think the question, maybe the question should have been can you measure safety? Like, we’ve, we’ve never asked that question. Question. I mean, I ask it, I’m like, can you measure safety? Well, to do that we’d have to define what it is the most common outcome is. The most common definition is whether we hurt somebody. And we’ve just established that’s not a good measure. So yeah, it’s, but again, nobody’s doing this on purpose. It’s, it’s a, we’re caught up in that desire for measurement. The other reverse question, of course is if somebody got hurt, it doesn’t mean it was unsafe. Correct. And again, there’s this awkward tension of like, not necessarily. And I’m like, correct. Right. So, my thesis at that point is generally once you’ve got this really good foundation, once you’ve stopped hurting people and you’ve gone through reactive, you may need to adopt a more nuanced and unfortunately complex. That’s a definite trade off I’m trying to grapple with, but a more nuanced idea of what safety is about so that the organization has got a more meaningful view. But if we bring that right down to frontline, if I sat with a frontline work team and said, hey, was today safe?

You know, how do they answer? And my experience is they go, yeah.

They give a vibey answer, which is not partially safe.

Yeah, it’s, it’s actually quite valid. But you can’t do anything with it. It’s totally useless from an organizational point of view. But if we push them on it and go, well, how do you know they’ll often fall back to what we made at home. And that isn’t a measure. So, while I correct, I’m doing sort of culture is the culture change is sort of the method, the strategy or the methodology? I suppose the strategy is about trying to create that. What’s the middle point? What is safety about? And I think it’s tricky trying to redefine it. So, shorthand is talk more about risk.

But I think that’s an important shift. Right. And I’ve grappled with this as well. I think we’ve made it worse by creating this concept of zero harm, zero injuries, zero incident. People start chasing this goal of zero, which then we know what happens. When you start chasing this goal of zero, it redefines what safety is. Frontline team members, typically when you say zero harm, they say it’s not possible, or zero injury, because they’ll say something could go wrong, equipment could fail, things the environment could change. And I think it’s okay to actually have something that’s not measurable, that pushes you to think about risk or a state of safety, the presence of safety as opposed to the absence of events.

Yeah. The interesting thing is I think we’re actually close. So, when we get to that tension point where they’re like, all right, we get it, stop measuring harm. Right. And it’s like, what else? And I’m like, okay, well, the issue is we can’t just start measuring other inputs because that’ll cause these other trade-offs around quality and quantity. So, 100%. I’m like, well, what if we focused on the things that actually contribute to safety? What are some of the inputs to it? Now that questioning. If you ask a group of frontline workers, give me examples of things that contribute to safety, they do say traditional stuff like equipment and procedures. They’ll actually say rules. But they don’t say paperwork.

But they do say rules. Nobody says paperwork.

Yeah, but they get the rules and procedures are part of it. The most common answer at Frontline is something about themselves, like experience, knowledge, training, skill. And then they talk about other features and traits like communication, support. And they say really cool stuff like trust and care and leadership.

Yeah.

And it’s like. And so, then I kind of. You can play with this and go like, I can ask a group of senior execs, is trust an input to safety? And it has to be right?

Right? It has to be. The research shows it too. But yes. Yeah.

If you want learning, like a prerequisite to learning is being told stuff to be told stuff. People need to have trust that when they speak up, they’ll be 100%. So that’s a prerequisite. So, trust, we know, is an input to safety. It’s entirely unmeasurable. You can’t create it through systems, but it’s still a thing.

And we accept it in business that trust is a thing that needs to exist, and you can’t measure it as well.

And we, you know, we like to measure things like our reputation. But you know, usually when we try and measure it too much, like we do a customer referral ratio and we say, you know, on a scale of 1 to 10, how likely are you to refer you first to a friend, but then the call center operator knows how they get measured and says a score of 9 or 10 is good. Like, you know, they, you give me the system. Yeah, exactly. Yeah. But the concept of it is, is correct. So, it’s. And I have found that it’s been easy for us in safety to kind of say what doesn’t work. But I think it’s up to us to provide that viable alternative. What, what does something else look like that, that can be done that’s practical, even if it’s a little harder. And I think giving leaders some of the context. So, zero harm’s an interesting one in that I, I get how organizations get there and its popular, it’s easy.

You don’t want to. Yeah, you don’t want to put a target of number of people you’ve injured. It’s a very easy one to put.

Yeah. But it causes a lot of dysfunctions.

Well, so, yeah, and I sort of, so I acknowledge why. It’s just that then there’s. And so, my answer is always like, well, I think that zero harm causes more or has more negative trade-offs than positives. So yeah, when I’m doing work with leaders, I kind of say, look, there’s a bit of a grammar that I want us to be able to work with. Trade-offs, compromises, power, trajectory, ethics, these are things that we need to think about. Whenever you’re doing anything, so you’re going to propose something, what are the trade-offs? What’s this going to look like in five years? What does this do to power? You know, these types of questions. And then the tricky bit in there, and this sort of, is part of my other bit, is this idea that a pathway towards safety is risk. So, I see managing risk and risk as the input and safety is the output. And I know there are different views on that, but it’s, it works in that argument. And so, my kind of, my thing is embracing risk is like actually saying, yeah, risk is at the core of what we do.

We completely accept, in fact that there are unpredictability and uncertainty in everything we do. And that is not always the most attractive and easy thing for leaders to do. To embrace the idea that they don’t know what’s going to happen tomorrow because I think they’ve been told they meant to. Like I think that leaders believe that they have to have a corrective action for every incident and they don’t. But I think it’s a really strong myth in safety. And in Australia if you talk to lawyers, the lawyers will be like stop coming up with useless crappy corrective actions that actually then get used against you to demonstrate what you could have done beforehand. Like, you know, so and same as I think that leaders think they have to prevent all human error, and you can’t. So, you know, so the viable alternative is, well instead of trying to prevent error, what if we said how do we manage human fallibility? Yeah, that’s the alternative in that language. Instead of trying to have a corrective action for every incident, what if we learned first and then decided if we needed to correct?

And in many ways if I think about on the aviation side, it’s been accepted pretty much in the 90s that humans are going to make mistakes, period.

Yeah, yeah.

And so, I can train you on things that are going to increase your probability to make errors. You will make mirrors. Everybody has only one person raised their hand when I asked them who’s never made a mistake. And, and so the guarantee is there so accepted. You can train around how you respond to it, you can prepare for it, but you also have to acknowledge when that error occurs, can we prevent from having a catastrophic consequence? If, if we could. Which is the risk side.

Yeah. If people are going to be fallible so you know, we can focus on in what ways do people make sense of this and how might they be fallible? And that’s a much more proactive way of looking at humans. Then how do I prevent human error? Because yeah, exactly, it’s impossible. So, look, if we want to get into zero harm stuff, partly it’s an anti-human philosophy.

Replace the human. You’d have to have a robot and even then, the robot’s programmed by a.

Human so well just to achieve zero would have to be perfect and humans are not perfect. It’s an anti-human goal. I mean one person I studied with made the comment that perfectionism is a psychological illness. So, I would never go so far as to accuse a group of senior leaders of having that. I would more say I’m just not sure you’re always aware of what you’re saying is you know, the outcomes of it and that that’s why the front line go it’s ridiculous because they feel it. They it’s Never hard to convince the front line that there’s risk in everything, that there’s risk and uncertainty. It’s the weird. That’s why I think leaders almost think they’re meant to do that. That’s why I think they’re meant to go to zero harm. So partly I try and give, you know, he’s a context. So wicked problems is an example of a methodology that I kind of go, hey, let’s talk about problems. All right? And some problems are simple and, and I normally say, what’s the opposite of simple? And they go, it’s complex. And I’m like, well, because I’m being me today, I’m going to put complex in the middle.

The good news is a lot of problems you solve are complex. But what if there are problems that can’t be solved? That’s really as a thought experiment, you know, simples at one end, complexes in the middle. What if there’s ones that they’re actually just uber complex? It’s just a language thing. But these wicked problems thinking came out of, I’m pretty sure the states in the 50s and 60s when sort of when policymakers were trying to tackle big things like health reform and social welfare and these big types of human based problems. And what it comes down to is for me, could we run into issues if we approach an unsolvable problem as if it was solvable? 

Right.

So, it’s actually just a strategy issue. If you have a solvable problem, then you can put parameters around it, you can set deadlines, you can do certain things, you can define success. If you have an unsolvable problem, you have to treat it differently. And because otherwise where do you stop is actually the issue. So, one of the strategies when you have a wicked problem, and I think that safety and risk, by the way, and culture nearly everything with people is a wicked problem. We can’t give up on it. So, one of the strategies is you need to have a declared stopping point, otherwise how far do you go?

But it gets to the point. I love your quote when you or the question you ask people is, is it possible to make things less safe in the name of safety?

Yeah. Yeah. Can we, can we inadvertently increased risk in the name of safety?

Yeah.

And everyone says yes, but, but I.

Think that’s the part of getting. There’s a discomfort because you don’t want to give up. There’s an incident, you want to find a way to say it’s preventable and you come up with an action. The board requires an action. Right?

Yeah. So, for Me, I introduce something like wicked problems. Not as a sort of a tool. Well, actually, it’s sort of a. It’s a thinking. It’s a thought brick sort of thing, a way to anchor to it. So, if we accept that safety and risk of wicked problems that can’t be solved, they just have to be tackled by the way, which doesn’t mean we give up, we have to tackle them. That’s language. And by the way, when you hear people jibber on, like me about wicked problems and hear the word tackle, you’ll now hear, well, most politicians only use that word tackle, because most problems that politicians deal with are wicked problems. And so, they should not promise to fix them, they should just tackle them. But one of the principles is you need to have a declared stopping point, otherwise you keep going forever. The problem with safety is, the problem with the language of safety is if we say what’s safe enough, we get caught in, well, like, no harm.

It’s uncomfortable.

Yeah, right. So again, the language of safety is not as useful as the language of risk, because if we anchor to risk and say, is there a stopping point? How much risk are we meant to manage? Well, it turns out most companies already have that written down in their policies. They usually have a risk statement of as low as reasonably practicable or as low as reasonably achievable. Some sort of statement that says, we will bring risk down to this level, but we accept that there’s going to be some residual risk.

Right.

And in Australia, our legislation says that. Our legislation doesn’t say, keep people safe, it says, manage risk as far as reasonably practicable to keep people. And so, there’s an irony in that most companies that have a risk policy and risk structure and risk systems already have that functionality built in there. It’s just that safety comes along and then says, no, no, we have to prevent all harm. So, again, one of my arguments I put forward is by embracing risk and saying the best we’re ever going to do is manage risk as far as reasonably practicable, and also then being able to say, actually, if we embrace risk as being part of what we do, that means there’s opportunity in risk, there’s innovation, there’s learning. But in safety, if I say, is risk good or bad? The immediate answer is nearly always like, oh, I think it’s bad, isn’t it? Aren’t we meant to get rid of it? And that puts it at odds with all the other people sitting around the leadership team. Like, if I talk to the commercial person, risk is Opportunity. It’s how they make their money. And you’ve got the safety person going, no, no, no, we have to get to zero.

We have to eliminate all risk. And I think that’s one of the issues, is it. It puts them at odds. And so this idea of framing everything around risk, I think it simply provides a more meaningful grammar. And then. And then what we sometimes end up doing in companies is to give it a bit more structure. We develop an artifact or a new model where we take the output of this question, what keeps you safe? Get all of that. There’s lots of things said. Distill it down to about five or six things and turn that into an artifact or a model to anchor to, if you will. And then that becomes a central focus for, you know, if we said, well, what’s safety about? Well, safety is about having the right people and the right systems and communication and care and listening and trust. And risk is still. Still. So, it’s a roundabout way. And then, of course, you got to make sure your leaders have got the capability to engage and influence and have these curious conversations and. Sure, that’s the tricky part.

Well, a tricky part, sorry, part. But I think it links back to what you started out with, is safety is actually multiple different disciplines. It’s more complex than just you have one safety person. Culture is very different than engineering at Risk as an example.

Yeah, it’s a throwaway line, is sort of like, don’t ask me to design a guard, but, you know, don’t ask an engineer to change culture. Like, ironically, though, I could design a guard. It just might not be good. But I will say engines can change culture because also, like, you know, what do we mean by culture? That’s part of this conversation. But people do change culture by being part of it, obviously. But the intentional design, that’s the bit I’d say to leaders. I’ve had people ask about, you know, we want to. It’s pretty loose language, but, you know, we really want to get a safety culture around here. And I kind of go, do you mean, like, you’ve already got a safety culture? Do you mean you want, like, a different one or a better one? You know? 

Right.

But then there’s debate within some areas of safety about whether safety culture is a thing shouldn’t just be culture or shouldn’t it just be. Should it be climate or should it be just how works done? And I don’t disagree with that. But it’s a good example of how fragmented we are, as I think we can do Better at being clear on saying, here’s my approach and this is what I’m talking about. And this is the little bit that’s good for.

This episode of the Safety Guru podcast is brought to you by Propulo Consulting, the leading safety and safety culture advisory firm. Whether you are looking to assess your safety culture, develop strategies to level up your safety performance, introduce human performance capabilities, re-energize your BBS program, enhance supervisory safety capabilities, or introduce unique safety leadership training and talent solutions, Propulo has you covered. Visit us at propulo.com.

So, so let’s go there. In terms of culture and culture change, you propose that rather than talking about harm, we are talking about risk. How does that change the language around culture?

Yeah. Cool. So, I mean, effectively for me, language is almost sometimes used. The sort of idea of language is kind of the currency of culture in that you can. Well, first of all, it’s what is culture. So, I use edge’s definition and model basically like shared beliefs and assumptions learned by groups as they tackle problems taught to others. So yeah, like to shift what people are thinking and doing. Language can do that. So, an example is, is this shift towards risk. And so I, at a leadership level encourage leaders to literally talk more about risk than safety. And there’s. I’ve got some models that I’ve been working on to sort of try and define what that looks like, even to the point like embracing risk, which is just sounds a bit like what does that mean? But you know, a lot of companies manage risk, but I think manage implies you’re still treating it like it’s something that’s external. And then I think some companies reject risk and I think that’s what some zero harm companies can feel like. They just reject the very notion of disruption and events and incidents. Whereas.

Right.

If leaders can sit with it and go, we understand there’s uncertainty in everything. When an event happens, they’re not happy with it, but it doesn’t freak out everybody. They understand that errors and disruption and variability and these are, these are normal things. And in fact, like is an incident information or is an incident, you know, the enemy? And so, you can see this happen when an incident happens? Well, actually the opposite. When an incident doesn’t happen, more mature organizations get more worried, like their incident rate drops way off. More mature organizations are going, hang on a minute, are we missing something here? Less mature organizations start celebrating and then next minute chaos happens. At some point something bad happens. And so that’s pretty high level. My example I’ll give if I can Share one at a really local level is the practicality of talking about risk over safety. So, one of my clients is a fuel transport business, and these drivers go out to customers, including farms, and they have to deliver fuel into tanks, and the farmers own the tanks. And the traditional sort of prescription or instruction was, you know, only fill a tank if it’s safe.

Sure.

And I guess, and often straight away, when I share that, people kind of like, oh, hang on, what’s a safe tank? What’s a safe tank? Now, in saying that, you can define it through some procedures, you can say it’s got to have an external ladder with a cage, it’s got to have a bottom fill kit. It’s got to have a sight glass. It has to be labeled. So, you can. You can set some binary things. The challenge is stability. And rust or corrosion is essentially impossible to write a procedure on. Now, when I’m working with the companies, I often frame up, I’m like, how many risk decisions are being made every day in the business? And there’s obviously thousands and thousands being made. And so, these decisions are currently being made. They’re just being made against the background of safe or unsafe. And the issue is, it’s sort of like, is that the way it works with a tank? Is rust safe and unsafe, or is it like, in this gray area in here? So, we just simply change the language with the drivers to be, you know, don’t fill a tank if it’s too.

If it’s too risky or unless it’s an acceptable risk. It’s still the same process, but the language matches what they’re currently doing, which is they’re thinking, they’re doing a little mini risk assessment.

Sure.

And then with the leaders, one of the challenges, again, I guess I try and talk to leaders about is you’re already trusting them to make these thousands of decisions. That’s the current case. So what if instead of this thought of we need to keep them safe, what if our goal was, how do we help them manage risk? So, it shifts the focus. Well, it puts the focus on the human, but it’s not the human as the object. It’s the human as the subject. It’s how do I support that human? And it’s actually empowering them. So, when we go back to the power conversation, I think a lot of people feel disempowered because they feel like the company’s just telling them how to be safe. They get held accountable if it goes wrong, but they don’t have any responsibility to make the decisions. So, this idea of that’s a philosophical thing. Your goal isn’t to tell them how to be safe. Your goal is to help them be safe, help them manage risk. Now, sometimes we’re going to give them procedures, but in this case, when we said, how do we help them decide whether a tanks too rusty?

And so, we got a bunch of expert drivers together and we’re like, what do you reckon? And they. They start telling stories and they show photos and them. And we do videos and we, you know, basically if somebody came and said, well, how do you make sure they know what, you know, what too much rust looks like? We go, well, we do this and it’s pretty loose. But we think it’s as best as we can do in this circumstance. And they were already doing it before. We’re just trying to help them do it. And so, the language matches what they’re doing. And then the final bit of that is this is more of an end thing. If they. When they’re talking to the farmer, instead of saying to the farmer, I can’t fill that tank, it’s unsafe. Which will usually get into a fight. Like, farmers love being told their tanks are unsafe, I’ll tell you. Yeah, exactly. Right. They’re just not happy about it. So, the language is, I can’t fill that tank. It’s too risky. And of course, the farmers aren’t happy, but their first question is going to be, what do you mean?

And then the drivers are, well, when I look at the corrosion or when I look at the stability or it doesn’t have a bottom fill kit. And they can be like, oh, but, but, but it’s fine. And then the drivers can be like, well, look, it’s too risky for us. It’s an unacceptable risk for our business. You can’t argue with that.  

You can’t. Right.

And I think the only reason we’re doing that is to make the conversation more meaningful. But it’s partly because safeties broken. Because we talk about safety as this binary on off thing. It’s safe or unsafe. We made it home or we didn’t make it home. And that might be true sometimes, but it’s not true all the time. And that’s the tricky part. That’s complex.

And so, somebody could easily say, you’re just changing the language. How does it change context, actions, behaviors? Right, yeah.

Just to be clear, that’s exactly what I’m doing. So, it turns out language changes how we think 100%. Yeah. This is a power that can be used for Good or evil. In this case, we think that it’s adjusting to the language to better meet what they’re doing and how they’re thinking. But again, one of the challenges for organizations, that question you posed before often framed up the front, can we do things in the name of safety that can unintentionally increase risk? I know everyone says yes. And I say, give me examples of how a lot of them are too much. Too many procedures, too many rules, too many checklists, too many signs giving people too many things to think about, that sort of stuff. So, the issue isn’t that we don’t know we’re doing it. The issue is we can’t break away from it. We’re anchored to it. Correct?

Yeah. So, it’s not will, it’s technique for me. And so that’s why I think language can be a useful tool on that one. So, with the how do we break that over correcting. And so, I think leaders are kind of used to this. When something happens, their first question is often, what are we doing about it? And so, I say to them, well, you want to anchor learning first. That’s the strategy, learning. Anchor to learning, then decide. But the language that sounds like is, we might teach them to say, hey, what do we know? So, we’re on the phone. It’s not what are we doing? It’s what do we know? And hopefully there’s enough trust that the person at the other end can say, not enough yet. And they say, cool, let me know when you. Let me know when you think we know enough to even look at it. Because if the person at the other end thinks they’re going to get a phone call that’s going to say, what are we doing about it?

They’ll find something to do.

They’re going to make shit up. They’re going to. Or they’re not going to take the call or they’re going to hide events like, yeah, that. But I get why leaders do it because every leader who does it know that the leader above them is about to ring them.

Absolutely.

It’s why everybody’s got to be aboard. It’s got to be top down. This approach of, well, again, a question I might ask is, could you have an incident and not know what happened? And usually people are like, I guess that could happen. Could you have an investigation and not have any corrective actions? And usually they’re like, oh, I don’t think so. And so, I’m like, right, right. So that’s another strategy here is the systems themselves. Sometimes lock in the process. So, if you do a scam, I don’t know, its scam, North American, it’s an Australian model scam, very well-known Australian investigation model. But okay, I know there’s some variations coming out for those listening who are screaming at me, but, but basically once you start one, you have to have corrective actions. It’s like baked into it.

And so, it’s built into the system essentially.

Yeah. And so that’s in the same way that, you know, monthly board reports, the recordable injury rates baked into it. Right. Like it’s, it’s, somebody’s got to decide to stop and then see what happens.

And I’ve seen it stop, which, yes, is courageous, but then you have to typically replace it with something else. 

Okay, cool. And I acknowledge that he’s like, what else? Yeah. And so that’s why I think too when I say language. It’s a really good comment by the way. I’m just changing language. I’m like, yeah, I know, but the language. And some systems change, I think too. So, we can say, for example, with some of my companies where we’ve done this work, we develop this model of what does a safe day look like. And what that model describes are the traits, features and characteristics of safety in action. And the data from that comes from when we ask them what contributes to safety. So, it’s entirely qualitative, but it’s like, yeah, what contributes to safety is having the right people using our systems care and listening to each other, managing risk. So it’s got these features in there. So that artifact becomes also usable as a tool. And then some of my clients, then you use that as their investigation model. Some of them use it for strategic planning, it becomes the central focus for it. So yeah, that question around like how do you actually do culture change? It is tricky, but language, systems change, you got to have people on board.

Of course, a bit of education. We need leaders to have the capability to do it as well. So, the leaders understanding what we mean by safety, risk and culture. I often do a section on psychology of risk in my workshops which is talking about conscious and non-conscious thinking and talking about biases and heuristics and timing to sort of go, you know, yeah, this is what’s happening. Actually, if I can share another really quick example, this is one of the most difficult ones I know a timing wise. So, the framing of this is about risk trade-offs, which risk is the most important risk to manage. And I’m not talking safety risks. So, I’m talking things like safety, quality, compliance, environment, schedule, cost. So, the framing here is we’ve got a task where we want somebody to do a check. It could be a pre inspection, it could be a prestart, it could be an inspection of an office area. Doesn’t matter what it is. Some sort of checking function which is a safety outcome.

Sure.

Because we’re systemized and we understand that humans are fallible. We’re going to give them a checklist. So, they’ve got a shopping list. It doesn’t make it perfect, but it makes it more likely that it’ll happen. Well, so we give them the shopping list, and we ask them to do it. So now the shopping list is both. The checklist is a safety tool. Once it’s filled out and it becomes a record, it’s now a compliance tool and there’s nothing wrong with that. It now is evidence of something as a record. Unless it’s got some knowledge in it as a record, it’s useless for safety. Now it’s done its job. So cool. We got happy days. Now we imagine that this worker is under a bit of time pressure and they’re going to make a decision. They’re going to make a trade off to either do the check and not have any checklist filled out or to sit down and do a quick tick and flick and. Yep. But not have done the check.

Right. So, the question for senior leaders is which one do you want them to do? Which trade off do you want them to make? The check or the checklist?

The check for sure.

Now the harder question, and this is clunky, I apologize for the way this question’s going to come out. The question when I’m talking to senior leaders is senior leaders is what you think they think you think.

Because you focus on the checklists that you’ve completed and you measure it, every senior.

Leader I’ve asked that question to is like, oh yeah, they probably think we want the checklist.

Right.

Particularly if it’s contractors, even more so.

But we tend to ding people if they didn’t fill the checklist because we assume that you didn’t do the risk assessment.

So, this dilemma of you’ve said you want the check, but you’ve just told me that you know that they probably think the checklist is an example of an unintended consequence. Nobody went out and did it on purpose, but you did it. Now when I ask them how do you think that happened? They’re usually pretty switched on and they’re like, well, it’s all we ask them for, right, so when we come back to this idea of language, its language is there is, there’s words, but there’s also focus. And language has power and energy. So, the absolute asking, hey, have you got that checklist? Have you got that checklist? It’s even worse when we use language like and this. Sorry, I’m about to get a little emotional here. But this language where literally workers will say they’ve heard this, if it’s not documented, it didn’t happen.

Yep.

Oh, yeah, that, that language is so powerful and it is directly responsible for this trade off that senior leaders will admit to of going, we want them to do the check. But I accept right now that they probably think we want the checklist and it’s simply because of the language and the focus in the organization, because that’s what everybody gets rewarded on short term is everyone gets in trouble for not having a bit of paper. Now the good news is, how do we tackle that? Well, we teach leaders to ask about the process first. So, they use their language and their focus to go, how did you pick anything up during the inspection this morning?

Did anything come out of the question?

Yeah, that’s all you’re doing is. So, it’s language change. But language when delivered by a leader is more than just words, it has power. And what we’re doing in that is basically convincing them that actually I’m more interested in the process than the paperwork. It in the same way I tell leaders, be careful of the first question you ask every morning of your team and there’s a way to test this too. Of go up to your team in the morning and say, how are you doing? And then wait and see if they pre answer a question for you. Like, anyway, schedule’s looking good and that’s priming. Right? Or the classic on site with safety people is they walk up to somebody on a construction site and the person’s already reaching down for the bit of paper and they didn’t ask for it, they just assumed that’s what they’re going to ask for. That was done through language. So therefore, correct language and focus is.

The strategy language and systems. Because I think the. Well, yeah, the part I like about the combination is system tends to build it in the process, tends to make it mechanical, repeatable, consistent. Because if we just do the language, then new leader comes in, if they haven’t learned the language. You go back this. I think the two components really key.

Yeah. And I think decluttering would be an example here. Like I’ve heard some people worry about the language, but also like, well, do you actually need that checklist every day? So, in the psychology part, if we break down the way people make sense of the world and things like flooding, bounded rationality and heuristics, it actually could be safer or less risky to use a checklist less often because people, even if they like the checklist, they get used to it. So, this isn’t saying tick and flick. This is just people start guessing what’s on a checklist. So, we might want to have maybe a daily check and then a weekly checklist. There’s no law saying we have to do all these checklists every day. We just made it all up. And I get why, because companies feel more comfortable with it. But then I think sometimes through looking at the psychology of risk stuff and the way people make sense, we can present a case to go. Actually, it could be safer in this case, removing the checklist portion. And the fuel transport business we did that; we got rid of. When they do their pre starts, they have a checklist available, but they don’t have to tick the boxes anymore to create a record.

And so, which is basically an aviation model too, by the way. Like not, not a maintenance model necessarily. But when pilots do pre starts, they have a checklist, but they’re not necessarily getting a bit of paper out and filling it out every now.

Generally, it’s a physical. It depends on the aircraft. But there’s also a physical component you take off. But the interesting piece is I’ve never seen a pilot not followed because they see the value and the reminders around it. And I’ve seen both engaged with it.

Right.

Because they’re both see.

Exactly. Yeah. We’re talking to truck drivers who are going. We think the pre starts are really important. We just think the bit of paper you make us fill out afterwards is a load of crap. So.

Right.

We. And if somebody comes along and says, how do you know they’re doing it? You go, go and watch them and go and ask them now also we’ve got maintenance records which showed that there were no issues and in fact, if anything minor reporting went up because they felt they had no time to do it. So yeah, that systems change, I think is. Yeah, absolutely. It’s. For me it’s secondary as an example because my philosophy is primarily culture. So, I approach it through does this.

But it reinforces culture. Right. I think it’s the two. The two bring it together.

Yeah, absolutely. It’s all mixed with it. Yeah. And then the risk component is well, if we’re going to declutter, how do we know what to keep and what not to keep? And then the question is, well, if you’ve got this concept of what are the five or six most critical things that are influencing safety or inputting safety, it’s like, well, does that system help that? Because if it doesn’t, that’s a. That’s straight away on the case for is it needed now again, by the way, that’s. Once you accept that humans have a capacity for, you know, they’ve got bounded rationality that I can only look at so many signs or think about so many things at once, then we can layer actually a really solid case for going. We got rid of that because of this. This. But I get that it’s scary. It was. It freaked out that fuel transport business, getting rid of that record. We didn’t get rid of the checklist; we got rid of the record and.

It sure of it. Of it being completed.

Correct.

They were really, Dave, phenomenal conversations. A couple of things that kind of jumped to mind was that this element of safety has lots of different specialties and you’ve got to have different. Like you talked about culture. Culture is not the specialty of an engineer as an example, but engineering out hazards, risks is so really that broader view of understanding. There are multiple disciplines in it. Shifting from harm to risk, I think is a really, key element.

Yeah.

That also changes language. And we talked a lot about language. I think it’s very powerful. It’s interesting because they. A couple years back, a couple decades back, you heard a lot about the power of language in the customer space. Yeah, experience, but not in the safety space. But this whole element of changing the language and I like the other part you talk about in terms of systems. Hugely important. Dave, if somebody wants to get in touch with you, what’s the best way for them to do that?

Yeah, LinkedIn’s definitely the easiest. Or my website, so that my business is people and risk and the website’s www.peopleandrisk.com and yeah. Dave Whitefield under people and risk on LinkedIn. So that’s the easiest and happy to chat and connect. And I’ve got some videos and some articles and papers and stuff.

I’ve written a lot of articles.

Yeah, I try. And it’s a good practice. Right. Is getting your thoughts out of your head into paper. They don’t have to be great; it’s just the practice of getting them out. I think is a really cool thing to play with.

Yeah, awesome. Thank you so much for joining me today.

Thanks so much, Eric. I really enjoyed it.

Thank you for listening to The Safety Guru on C-suite Radio. Leave a legacy. Distinguish yourself from the past. Grow your success. Capture the hearts and minds of your teams. Elevate your safety. Like every successful athlete, top leaders continuously invest in their safety leadership with an expert coach to boost safety performance. Begin your journey at execsafetycoach.com. Come back in two weeks for the next episode with your host, Eric Michrowski. This podcast is powered by Propulo Consulting.

ABOUT THE GUEST

Dave Whitefield helps organizations tackle safety without doing more safety. He does this through a specific focus on improving safety and risk culture maturity, built on an organization’s existing foundation of hazard management and formal safety systems. The framework for this approach has been developed primarily from a social psychological paradigm, and is based on over 30 years of experience across a wide variety of roles and industries, as well as tertiary qualifications in behavioral science, occupational health and safety, and social psychology of risk.  Dave’s work is designed to help people and organizations more meaningfully engage with safety by embracing risk. 

For more information: https://www.peopleandrisk.com/

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dave-whitefield-3b45501/

RELATED EPISODE

STAY CONNECTED

The Safety Guru with Eric Michrowski

More Episodes: https://thesafetyculture.guru/

C-Suite Radio: https://c-suitenetwork.com/the-safety-guru/

Powered By Propulo Consulting: https://propulo.com/

Eric Michrowski: https://ericmichrowski.com

EXECUTIVE SAFETY COACHING

Like every successful athlete, top leaders continuously invest in their Safety Leadership with an expert coach to boost safety performance.

Safety Leadership coaching has been limited, expensive, and exclusive for too long.

As part of Propulo Consulting’s subscription-based executive membership, our coaching partnership is tailored for top business executives that are motivated to improve safety leadership and commitment.
Unlock your full potential with the only Executive Safety Coaching for Ops & HSE leaders available on the market.
Explore your journey with Executive Safety Coaching at https://www.execsafetycoach.com.
Executive Safety Coaching_Propulo

Advocating a Safer Tomorrow: A Mother’s Mission to Make Workplaces Safer with Patrizia Cassaniti

Advocating a Safer Tomorrow: A Mother's Mission to Make Workplaces Safer with Patrizia Cassaniti

LISTEN TO THE EPISODE: 

ABOUT THE EPISODE

Join us for a deeply moving and powerful episode featuring Patrizia Cassaniti, a passionate safety advocate who transformed unimaginable tragedy into a mission for change. Patrizia recounts the heartbreaking loss of her son, Christopher, in a preventable construction incident caused by complacency and poor safety decisions. Through her story, she underscores the critical importance of putting workers’ safety first, fostering open communication, and creating a culture where workers feel empowered to speak up and know their safety concerns will be heard and respected. With passion and unwavering commitment, Patrizia challenges the production pressures so common in many workplaces and reminds us that every safety decision matters because everyone deserves to return home safely to their loved ones. Join us for this inspiring and heartfelt conversation about a mother’s mission to make workplaces safer and advocate for a safer tomorrow for all.

READ THE EPISODE

Real leaders leave a legacy. They capture the hearts and minds of their teams. Their origin story puts the safety and well-being of their people first. Great companies ubiquitously have safe, yet productive operations. For those companies, safety is an investment, not a cost for the C-suite. It’s a real topic of daily focus. This is the Safety Guru with your host, Eric Michrowski, a globally recognized ops and safety guru, public speaker and author. Are you ready to leave a safety legacy? Your legacy success story begins now.

Hi, and welcome to the Safety Guru. Today, I’m very excited to have with me Patrizia Cassaniti. She’s an international keynote speaker and a director and founder of Touch by Christopher Foundation. Patricia, welcome to the show. Very excited to have you with me today.

Eric, I’m very honored to be on your podcast. Thank you for having here today.

Absolutely. So why don’t we start with Christopher’s story? Because it’s quite touching.

Yes. So, I’ll start off pretty much in the beginning of Christopher’s life. Christopher was my second son. I have three beautiful boys, and Christopher was my middle. But there’s a special story behind Christopher’s birth. When I gave birth to Christopher, when I got to the hospital, there was no heartbeat. So, they thought that Christopher was actually going to be stillborn. But when he was born, he was screaming. Everything was fine. And even the pediatricians and the obstetricians were going, what on Earth happened? We don’t understand because there was definitely no heartbeat there. Christopher was born on the 27th of March 2003. Sorry, 2001. And I brought him home on the first of April around lunchtime. And when I reflected at the time when he died, he actually died on the first of April around lunchtime, 18 years later. When Christopher was born, obviously, thinking before I even went in to have him, with an emergency Caesar that I wasn’t going to have a child. So, for me, he was always a miracle child right from the beginning, from the moment he was born. He was very special throughout his whole life with family. A lot of people were drawn to him.

A happy, very happy person, never angry, always smiling, and was truly the light. Every time he would walk in any room, and as they say, a smile, he always smiled and made everyone so happy. So, he was my angel. He was my angel on Earth, and now he’s my angel for real. And growing up, my boys were very boys, very much typical boys. And in 2017, Christopher finished year 10, and he decided he didn’t want to go on to further his education in the last two years that we normally have. In Australia, we got to Year 12. He said, Mom, I want to get into construction. At the time, I was working as a coffee lady. I had my own coffee van, like a mobile one, and I would go around to all different sites and provide coffees, and I would provide lunches, smoker to all the workers. I got to know a lot of the workers personally, and I asked the form workers on that specific site to see whether they would give Christopher a trial, and they agreed straight away. The next day, when he finished his year 10, I had He did him up in his PPE, had his white card ready, which is the white card is what allows you to be able to work on job sites and high-risk work.

He came with me 5: 30 in the first morning and started his trial and absolutely loved it. Loved the camaraderie. He loved the outside, loved the job. Everyone on that side absolutely loved him because of his kind nature, the way he was. A lot of people were drawn to him. His bosses would come up to me to the coffee van, and they would say to me, Trisha, I don’t know what you’ve done, but he’s not your typical 18-year-old. He’s the best apprentice we’ve ever had. He truly made me proud, really did. A lot of trades would also come up to me, say, If Christopher decides to change, to do a different job, please send him our way because we’d love to have him as an apprentice. That’s the type of kid Christopher was, not just at work, but at home as well. Very helpful, very kind, beautiful person. On the 27th of March, like Actually, before his birthday, about a month before his birthday, we do a lot of water skiing. We used to borrow a boat to get onto the water. I was just sick and tired of seeing my kids on their Xboxes all the time and in their dark rooms.

I grew up water skiing. I said to my husband, I said, we really got to get these kids out. We started borrowing somebody’s boat and getting onto the water and teaching our kids how to water ski. In the first year and a half of Christopher’s working life, he had saved all this money and then went out and bought himself a boat. So absolutely proud of himself. It was about a month before he died. So unfortunately, we didn’t get to use the boat, probably put in the water once or twice before he died. So, it’s quite heartbreaking. And about five years ago, just before Christmas, that boat got stolen. But coming leading up to His birthday on the 27th of March of that year, where he had just bought himself a boat, he was already up in the clouds thinking, Wow. He’s not even turned 18, and he’s already got a massive wakeboard boat. As he turned 18, it was a Wednesday morning, 27th. We get into the van as per normal, go to work at the coffee van, but I hid a cake inside the van. I had everyone’s coffee done. Everyone went off to work, and I grabbed the cake, and I went into his lunchroom, and I called his boss and said, Go gets Christopher.

It’s his birthday today. So, they went and got him. But you can only imagine when he walked through those lunchroom doors and saw his mother with a great big cake, he was absolutely mortified. He thought, Oh, my God, mom. I said, what are you doing? You can’t do this. He goes; I’m working on a job site. I’m never going to live this down. I looked at him, I said, But you’re 18. I said, we have to celebrate. I can tell you now, it was a day that I never lived down. I can tell you now. That very first day, he also had loan papers ready because he wanted to buy a car that he’d put aside that was owned by one of the steelworkers that was on site. He had just bought himself a brand-new car and was selling his car. So, Christopher approached him, he says, Mate, I’ve just bought a boat. I’ve spent all my money. And can you wait until I turn 18 so that I can actually take this loan out to buy your car? Because I need a car now. And the guy looked at him and said, Are you sure?

What if you can’t get a loan? He goes, Then I’ve got this car, and I’ve got to keep it for you. He says, oh, no, please, please do. So, he did. Christopher had his loan approved that very morning. He bought the car, picked it up on the Friday, happy as Larry. Oh, my God. He was so happy. Then Saturday, he drove himself to work for the first time in his own car. That afternoon, when he came home, we celebrated his 18th birthday with family and friends. But the whole night was spent outside in the car, up and down the street, planning what he’s going to do to the car, and the things he’s going to put on it, and the places he was going to take it to because it was a high lux four-wheel drive, so you can take it on adventures. Then on the Sunday, he gets up, he looks at me and he goes, Mom, I’m so happy because now I’ve got my car to tow my boat. But there’s one more thing I’d like to do. I thought, Oh, my God, what’s that? Mom, I want my car to be fully sick.

I just looked at him and went, What? He I said, fully sick is very expensive. Now, the word fully sick is a car that has been done up to the max. new tires, new wheels, new snorkel, all these things to make this car look amazing. I looked at him and I said, In time. I said, you’ve just spent all your money on a boat. You’ve now bought a car on loan, and you need to save some money. He says, Yeah, I know. I said, Jim, tomorrow, I’m not coming to work with you. You can go. You’ve got your own car. Now, I’m going to stay home and clean up after his birthday. Monday morning, he wakes himself up, gets in the car, drives to work. At 12:20 PM, a nine-story scaffold that was two bays wide, collapses and crushes him to death. Everything Christopher aspired for, everything, gone. All because of a five-minute complacent decision that was made that took him for life. It breaks my heart because Christopher never got to experience life as an adult. He never even got the chance to have his first beer at the pub with his mates.

And his whole life taken from him over a choice, over a decision that should never have ever been made. And that decision was to remove to move every single tie that holds a scaffold to the building on a nine-story scaffold.

Unbelievable.

Yeah. It was just absolutely insane. And not only that, but the builder also decided to lift with a crane two pallets on every single level of that scaffold, making it overloaded by 18. 9 tons.

Wow, 18. 9 tons. That’s crazy. Yeah, 18. 9 tons. So, the choices and decisions made on that day were detrimental. There wasn’t even a mistake. It was all due to getting the job done. Two weeks prior, there was an Alamac there that was removed because it was costing too much money for the company to keep it there. And because they had a crane in front of that building that they had to put the bricks on the balconies, they decided they’ll use a crane to lift the bricks on top. The hardest thing is that Christopher and Carla, his supervisor, were actually working through lunch because as farmworkers, all they were doing was they were next to the scaffold, they weren’t even on it. They were forming up a planter box which had to be poured that afternoon. The place where that planter box was situated was actually an exclusion zone, so they shouldn’t even be there. But because they were working through lunch and everyone was in the lunchrooms, the builder said, just get it done. Just get it done now because everyone’s in their lunchrooms, no one’s going to disturb you. Get done. But two brick layers had just finished their lunch, and they stepped onto the ninth floor of that scaffold seconds before it actually collapsed.

It was a 26-year-old and a 64-year-old. A 26-year-old was the one that actually felt it move away from the building when he grabbed a 64-year-old man and pushed him onto the balcony ledge. And the whole scaffold has collapsed from underneath and then crashed in, Christopher and Khaled. Prior to the scaffold actually collapsing, there was scaffolders standing in front of it with their leading hand, absolutely mortified of the load that was on there, that they actually said, we need to stop the job. We need to get everybody off the podium now and remove everybody and get those bricks off the scaffold. But it was the actual leading hand that had that she’ll be right moment to say, It’s okay. We’ve already organized a forklift to take those bricks off the scaffold and onto the balcony ledge soon. Well, that soon didn’t come soon and there were 250 workers that worked at this site. And I can tell you know that’s 250 lives that have been changed so drastically. Because when tragedy like these hits, it doesn’t affect just the person that has been injured or died and their families. It affects everybody, coworkers, managers, the business, everything.

Over choices and decisions that were made that weren’t an accident. They’re incidents waiting to happen because of complacent decisions that are made that lead up to them. The way my son died was horrific. Absolutely horrific. I will never, ever accept what happened. This is why I do what I do. To go around workplaces. I do expos, whatever it takes for me to get in front of as many workers as I can to shift that complacent mindset, give them the courage to always speak up because no one should ever go to work and die. My son survived it for 20 minutes, and then he suffocated to death. And in that 20 minute, his supervisor, who was also crushed, and his injuries are so horrific that he wishes he died with Christopher. But he held Christopher’s hand for those 20 minutes, and he said, Trish, it’s not my pain. It’s not the fact that I can’t sleep anymore. The worst part of my life and living every single day, is hearing your son scream out your name, and there was nothing that I could do. This is so heartbreaking because it affects so many families over those incidents.

This one incident that has affected the company, it has affected the decision makers who made those decisions and choices, and the whole workers that were there that witnessed it. It’s just horrific. Absolutely horrific.

It’s a horrible tragedy. And story that really, like you said, this should never have happened. There’s no reason there’s so many signs that this was not okay from removing the ties to overloading it to working in an area that nobody should have been in. One of the themes that you bring up with audiences is this element that we’re all humans and also this element of needing to walk with workers. Tell me a little bit more about that.

Yes. So, when it comes to going to work, we got to understand that we spend most of our living time at work. Our coworkers, everyone at work is like family, okay?

Right.

Even as an owner, CEO, manager, it’s still a job, okay? It is still a job for them because they still have family at home waiting as a worker, it is a job. It’s a job for everybody for us to do, but we all must do it safely. We’re not robots, and I say this all the time. A lot of people, it doesn’t matter where you are in the It’s a shame. If we all come together and work together and listen to each other, things will synergistically work. When I say walk with the workers, it’s not about walking the talk or doing what you say as a manager or a leader. Everyone has safety protocols put in place. Everyone has to do the right things at all times. We have to provide workers with a safe working environment at all times. In the end, I always say it’s the worker that makes the last decision. They are the ones in the co-face, and they’re the ones doing the job. They are the experts. And as managers, they need to respect that. They need to respect that they are the expert at what they are doing. Sure.

Managers give the job and workers do it. So, communication is key. We can’t remove the human factor. We are going towards AI at the moment as well. So, a lot of things is done in AI. We’ve got to remember that AI has no emotions. It doesn’t know when someone is fatigued. Keep that human factor when it comes to high-risk work at all times. And when as a manager, the best thing I can say is walk with the workers because we are human. And no manager ever wants to have the task of having an incident happen on their watch and the task to have to go to someone’s house, knock on the door to let them know that their loved ones are coming home.

Right.

And unfortunately, a lot of managers have that hierarchy feel of, I’m your boss, you do what as I say. I’m not understanding if someone’s being put in danger and something happens, it actually affects them as well.

Of course.

The trauma, when an incident like this happens, it does affect you mentally. And you take this home, so it affects your families as well. So, let’s all be… Let’s understand, yeah, you might have that hierarchy, you might have that leadership role, but you also have to walk with workers to see what they are doing and listen to them. Listen to what they’re saying when they’re speaking up to say, I don’t feel right. But I also encourage workers to always speak up when something isn’t right, to stop convincing themselves that it is, because that is where tragedy leads, is as soon as we have that she’ll be right moment. I’ve done this a thousand times before. Oh, Jeff did it the other day, and it worked. Why shouldn’t it work for me? We can’t live on luck. We can’t live on having They’re locked behind us because one day it’s going to pinch. And those pinch points are like black snakes. They just strike. And when they strike, it’s You can’t go back. You can’t fix it.

The lead had the chance, heard from team members saying, doesn’t look right. And that’s a perfect example of what you’re talking about in terms of when people were Is speak up, which is already a beautiful thing because as you said, it doesn’t always happen. We don’t always get people speaking up the way we want to. But here they did. Didn’t feel right. There’s at least three things that were not right that day. But this element of it’ll be okay. I think you said she’ll be right. That’s very, very dangerous to not listen to people speaking up like this.

And can you imagine their lives today? They’ll never be the same. And I do feel for them because I know it’s not just me, myself, my husband, and my children that are suffering from this. I do believe that the people who made those choices and decisions on that day that caused the scaffold to collapse, lying their bed, staring at the ceiling saying, I should have, I could have. Well, I should have, I could have does not save lives. We must listen to each other and put human life, never risk human life or injury for any job. Agreed. And it’s just not on because in the end, it’s a job. We’re all a number. Even as a leader, you’re just a number. And you get replaced Because a job gets done with or without you. But family can never replace you. If you’re mentally scarred by something, your whole life changes, even as a leader. And you take that home with you. Your family can’t replace you because your mental health declines when an incident like this happens. So, choices and decisions is what we must know, recognize when we are being complacent. That is when we have to sit there and think, why did I say that to myself?

Why did I say she’ll be right? Why did I say, I’ve done this a thousand times before? It is then that we have to stop and evaluate.

Before. And I mean, I take through my journey and through my speaking engagements with workers, I take workers and managers on a journey with me to make them understand what it feels like to be in a tragedy. I show a video of the incident. I’ve created a reenactment of the whole day; from the moment my son gets up to moment that he dies. And then it’s followed by a real video of the aftermath depicting, obviously, the trauma of those 250 workers that come to try and rescue the sun. Now, that journey is in my hope that I’m the only tragedy they ever get to see to shift that mindset of them understanding the next time they have she’ll be right moment that they to really stop. Because unless you’ve been through tragedy or have witnessed tragedy, safety will never be in the forefront of your mind. And that is what I try to do through my speaking is to bring people on that journey and allowing them to understand that we are all priceless and we all have people waiting for us at home.

Right.

This episode of the Safety Guru podcast is brought to you by Propulo Consulting, the leading safety and safety culture advisory firm. Whether you are looking to assess your safety culture, develop strategies to level up your safety performance, introduce human performance capabilities Please re-energize your BBS program, enhance supervisory safety capabilities, or introduce unique safety leadership training and talent solutions, Propulo has you covered. Visit us at propulo.com.

Another thing I want to touch on is you talked about the pressure that was on the site from a financial standpoint, and this element of some form of production pressure shows up in many different incidents. It’s often a precursor for mistakes, for people to overlook things. And you made an interesting observation where we were initially talking about how in construction, there’s always some form of pressure. But you can control it because some job sites are able to control, they’re still able to deliver, and you don’t get these types of incidents. And in others, it permeates the entire site that we’re fouling behind. We need to catch up, and everybody starts making trade-offs. Tell me a little bit about how, from what you’ve seen, you can deal better with production pressure in a job site.

So, when it comes to time and money, as human beings, we lose that human factor because we are under that pressure of getting the stuff done so that we can get it done in time. And this is where things become robotics. Things, choices and decisions that are made aren’t based on safety anymore because they just have to get done. Sure. A lot of problems are that when you’re working outside, we have to deal with weather, we have to deal with rain, we have to deal with stops where they’re uncontrollable. These problems, unfortunately, do not add on to the end date. No one says that… We’ve had a whole week of rain where we’ve not been able to do anything. We need to add another week to the end date so that we can catch up. But that end date doesn’t ever change. Everything becomes time and money. We need to hurry. As soon as you start saying, we need to hurry, get this done, and everybody works on top of each other, things start happening, and you lose control. When you lose control of a situation, you’re not only just putting workers and yourself at risk, but you’re actually putting the business at risk.

Because when an incident happens, the business suffers, and so do the people. So, there is no point There’s no point in trying to push something that is inevitable. There’s no point. We need to start having maybe legislations, laws in place that says that if we have a big weather event or a natural disaster that has stopped us from working for a significant amount of time, that that time needs to be added to the end date, which never gets done. There’s always you come to the end date and people are going, oh, you’re going to have to pay extra because you’ve gone a day over. And you got to pay extra every single day that you go over. Of course, that’s going to put a pressure on each individual, workers, managers, the big guy is pushing, come on, we got to get this job done because we need to get paid. But what is the point? What is the point if something does happen and you die? Where’s the money going to go? It’s not yours. You’re not here. Or if you’re injured, what’s the money going to do for you? And as a business, you lose your business at times, depending on the size of your business.

An incident like this, you can shut shop and just say, That’s it. That’s it for me. And you could have been working on this job on your business for years and years and years. And it gets taken down within a matter of seconds.

In this case, the job site was closed for three months after.

It cost them millions, millions and millions. For what? A job? Seriously? If they just did the right thing, if they made those right choices and not stick to the problem of saying, she’ll be right, and understand that there are human beings that are involved, this would never have happened. Those buildings would have still been here, Christopher would still be here, and 250 workers wouldn’t be affected mentally.

I’d say the production pressure also; there’s a lot that can be done in terms of how an organization bids or prices or prepare us for a job. Obviously, it’s a competitive environment. So as long as somebody goes lower, that introduces new problems. But if people are realistic about timelines, we know storms are going to happen. We know it’s just going to be rain, there’s going to be weather environment. But it’s also how the leaders show up, because I’ve been to job sites, construction sites, where you sense the pressure. Everybody knows that you’re behind. And I’ve gone to other job sites that are equally behind, and people are just like, we’re going to do it right. It is what it is. We can’t change the outcome. We’re behind. We’re going to do the right thing. And so how the leaders show up, the leaders can still stress about it in the boardroom, but not bring it to the crew, to the crowd, to the There’s many different ways because it can be very different from one side to the other. Correct.

And this is where communication is very important. Ask the workers, what can we do to make things a little bit easier if there is that time pressure. Don’t put more pressure on them. Involve workers to make that communication and actually speak to the leaders of something that they can do to make better. When I go on sites and speak to workers, I’ll get someone say, I can’t do my job because I’ve got the brick layers on top of me doing something else, and I’m scared they’re going to drop a brick on me, so I’m not going to work here. And then when time starts to get underneath and people are losing that time, they start putting people on top of each other.

Which is what happened here. 

And the planning Yeah, the planning goes out the window. All the planning that is done prior goes out the window because of time management and money. Because they’re saying, we’re losing money. It’s taking too long. Okay, now let’s just put all these workers together, get it done all at once in one day when there is a process. Everything has a process. Everything has protocols. Certain workers need to finish before another worker steps in to continue. And when those time and pressures get involved, things go pear shape. And the only way to do this is communicate with the workers. Make them understand what’s happening. Let them be part of that communication because they know best.

Make sure they have a voice, right?

Yes. They know best. They are the experts. Some CEOs, some bosses, some managers feel like as though They are the experts, but they’re really not. That’s the reason why they employ workers with the expertise to get the job done. Otherwise, they would do it themselves. It’s about understanding the worth, the worth of the worker, and the worker understanding the worth of the manager being able to tell them what they have to do. But understand that if the worker says it’s not right, it just isn’t.

You have to listen to it.

It just isn’t. Stop convincing yourself that it is.

And that’s where the leaders set the stage, because it’s also multiple levels of leaders. You talked about the CEO, but multiple levels of leaders, but they have to set the stage in, my expectation is to walk with the workers, understand, listen, seek input, and make sure that they make the right choice, because ultimately, they have a huge amount of agency of influence around how the frontline workers show up and the decisions they make.

A hundred I’ve been to so many pre-starts where I watch the leaders do the pre-start with a piece of paper in front of their face and just read. Okay? It’s horrible. They’ll say, Conquer Concrete as you are today in building C, you have to get this done and this done, and then they go on to the brick layers, brick layers, you got to do the balconies today. They’re not even looking up. They’re just reading. I always believe as a pre-start and as a leader, you don’t read just off a piece of paper. You acknowledge the workers in the room. If you’re talking about the concertos, say, hey, concertos, where are you? Put your hand up. Get their attention because I can tell you now, every pre-start, workers aren’t in full attention of what the leader is saying. They’re too busy on their phones having their breakfast or whatever it is. As a leader, call out the concrete as they’re in the room and say, Concrete is where are you? Put your hand up. As soon as they put their hand up, they’ve been acknowledged by the leader that they’re in the room and then talk to them.

Speak to them, even though you may read it, read their task, but then look up to make sure that they’ve acknowledged that task, and then connect with them and then ask the question, Is there anything we can do for you that you felt that what I’ve just given you may not work. Can you please elaborate?

I like that.

Okay. And then 100%, that’s the human factor, right?

But it’s also touching on what you said. People have best laid plans. When you start having production deadlines, challenges, and so forth, in this particular case, they did plans that nobody would have conceived doing it at the front end, hopefully. And then somehow, they just execute without even questioning, saying, Have I missed something? Because Every person makes mistakes, including leaders.

A hundred %. And if we all understand each other, how much better would our workplace be? And how much better is your workplace going to flow when your worker feels important and belongs? Because they are acknowledged. Do not just read a task to someone. Acknowledge them before you go on to the next task in the next trade. And ask the question, just say, is there anything that I’ve missed? Or is there anything you need today to make your job better?

Another part I want to touch on is one of the pieces you talk about is the importance of stopping and speaking up. And I would say the leaders also have a role in this. In this particular case, two people stopped and spoke up. And so, there’s also an element of how we reinforce when that happens so that we encourage that this is what we want to see and listen to people. But that’s a hugely important piece on the job side because nobody is able to know everything. Nobody is able to wrap their head around everything and see every potential hazard. A lot of research shows that we miss half the hazards in front of us, even if we’re experienced.

It’s because we are too busy. It’s because we are trying to get the job done. We’ve been told to get it done. This is a time You have to do it in. You don’t even ask the questions anymore. We don’t even flinch when we’re being complacent. We don’t have that anymore. We forget, and we’ve been so good now at actually ignoring our natural instincts that tell us we’re in danger because we are so busy. We have butterflies in our stomach, which is our second brain. And those butterflies are an instinct, a natural instinct to give you a warning that something isn’t right. Yet we convince it, we squash it down, and don’t even think about it, go, no, I’ve just been told I got to get this job done. I’m sure it’s fine. I’ve got to get done. Then stuff happens. And when stuff happens and you really think about it and no one, unfortunately, realize the reason why until it’s too late that you think, It’s just a job. That’s all it is. It’s just a job. Why are you risking your life or injury to get the job done?

For what? For what? Speak up. 

Say no. Because you get replaced. The job gets done with or without you. Your family is waiting for you at home. And the only reason we go to work, doesn’t matter where you are in the chain, is for ourselves and our family. Full stop. That is the only reason why we work. No one chooses to be there. No one is fist-pumping that they’re at work. No matter where you are, we all We all have to go there. We don’t choose to be there. So, the key here is we all must respect, speak up, and always, always listen. Walk with each other.

Patricia, you have a very powerful story, a very, very tragic story around Christopher and what happened that day. You’ve used it from an advocacy standpoint to drive positive change from a legislative standpoint in Australia. And then the other part you touched on briefly is you try to really bring this to life with stories, videos, really connect with the audience. Tell me a little bit about both, so both the advocacy side and some of the results on that front, but also how you make this very real when you speak to employees in different organizations around the world.

So, the way I do that is obviously through my videos, the reenactment. I only produced a reenactment this year. It took me six years to get it done because it’s my It’s also my reality. I relive my son’s death every single day in the hope that I can shift mindset in every single worker. I can’t change the world. I’m not here to change the world. I’m here to change the individual that I impact through my story, through my videos, visual videos that actually show you the tragedy. If what I do doesn’t impact, I don’t know what will. I really don’t Because I don’t sugarcoat my son’s death. I tell it as it is. The reality of it hits home to every individual to make them realize why. What are they doing? Why are they risking life to get a job done? It’s not worth it. That is the key thing for me. With the legislation, obviously, after Christopher died, it took three and a half years for me to actually figure out and really find out what happened my son because I wasn’t privileged enough to know.

Even as his mom.

As his mom, I wasn’t privileged to know all the details because I had to go through court. So, it was sealed. And no, I was allowed to know until the court date. So, me sitting down in a courtroom and listening to the judge. And prior to the court starting, I was taken into a room by the prosecutor to give me a pre-warning and to tell me that there was no law in place that held anyone culpable for my son’s death. Well, that didn’t go very well down with me.

I’m sure.

And so, I educated myself. I went out. I got myself a certificate for in WHS so that I could understand the law and then tackle the government. And what I mean, I I called the government. I went in hard, and I fought for five years for industrial manslaughter to be introduced in our state of New South Wales. Every state started to get it in through all the tragedies that have been happening and the advocacy that laws in our WHS law needed to be changed so that people are held culpably. Because if I kill someone in a car, I go to jail. In Australian laws, we go to jail. There are no ifs, no buts. If your fault or not, if I kill someone on the streets, I go to jail. But if you killed someone at work, there was no penalties, none. There’s just a penalty for the organization. At the time, the highest penalty was $3 million. So, introducing industrial manoeuvrer, not only did we increase those penalties to $25 million for a category one offense, but also 20 years for people who are workers who are responsible for someone’s death, which brings in consequences when something isn’t right.

And when deliberate needs are done. And when you ignore it.

Yes. Yes. When you foresee a problem and you speak up and nothing is done about it, you are responsible for that person dying. No one goes to work intending on dying But no one also goes to work intending on killing someone either. But unless we put these consequences in place and let people understand that we all are responsible for safety, every single one of us, management to CEOs, to builders, to the actual workers. We are all responsible for safety, and we all need to work together. So yes, our laws did change. It took me a while to fight them, but these consequences needed to be put in place to stop people from doing the wrong thing because they just had to get the job done. Right.

And Patricia, if somebody wants to get in touch with you, would be interested in hearing about having you present to the organization, what’s the best way for them to reach out to you?

They can go on to my website Our website, which is https://www.letstalkaboutsafety.com.au/ That’s https://www.letstalkaboutsafety.com.au/ or they can also email me, which is [email protected]. I’m very easily found on LinkedIn as well. Just my name and touched by Christopher. If they Google my name Patrizia Cassaniti. I’m very much, very easily found on social media with LinkedIn as well.

Excellent. Thank you so much for joining me today to record this episode, for sharing Christopher’s story, as painful as it is to talk through. I really appreciate the time you took.

No, thank you for having me. And thank you for thinking of me to be on your podcast. So much appreciated. Absolutely.

Thank you for listening to The Safety Guru on C-suite Radio. Leave a legacy. Distinguish yourself from the past. Grow your success. Capture the hearts and minds of your teams. Elevate your safety. Like every successful athlete, top leaders continuously invest in their safety leadership with an expert coach to boost safety performance. Begin your journey at execsafetycoach.com. Come back in two weeks for the next episode with your host, Eric Michrowski. This podcast is powered by Propulo Consulting.

ABOUT THE GUEST

Patrizia Cassaniti is an international award-winning work health and safety advocate whose lived experience has become a catalyst for cultural change across Australia’s workplaces. In 2019, her 18-year-old son, Christopher, was tragically killed when a scaffold collapsed—an incident that was entirely preventable. Since then, Patrizia has dedicated her life to confronting complacency and inspiring workers to speak up for safety without fear.
Her presentations are raw, emotional, and unforgettable—reminding every worker why their family is the reason to work safe every day. Through her foundation, Touched by Christopher, Patrizia supports families who have lost a loved one at work, helping them grieve without the burden of financial stress.
Book Patrizia to deliver this powerful, life-saving message at your next safety event: [email protected] | +61 414 656 621

RELATED EPISODE

STAY CONNECTED

The Safety Guru with Eric Michrowski

More Episodes: https://thesafetyculture.guru/

C-Suite Radio: https://c-suitenetwork.com/the-safety-guru/

Powered By Propulo Consulting: https://propulo.com/

Eric Michrowski: https://ericmichrowski.com

EXECUTIVE SAFETY COACHING

Like every successful athlete, top leaders continuously invest in their Safety Leadership with an expert coach to boost safety performance.

Safety Leadership coaching has been limited, expensive, and exclusive for too long.

As part of Propulo Consulting’s subscription-based executive membership, our coaching partnership is tailored for top business executives that are motivated to improve safety leadership and commitment.
Unlock your full potential with the only Executive Safety Coaching for Ops & HSE leaders available on the market.
Explore your journey with Executive Safety Coaching at https://www.execsafetycoach.com.
Executive Safety Coaching_Propulo

The Power of Safety Voice: Building a Culture of Speaking Up to Drive Change with Dr. Archana Tedone

The Power of Safety Voice: Building a Culture of Speaking Up to Drive Change with Dr. Archana Tedone

LISTEN TO THE EPISODE: 

ABOUT THE EPISODE

What is safety voice, and why is it important? Don’t miss this exclusive conversation with our returning guest, Dr. Archana Tedone, Assistant Professor of Management in the Dolan School of Business at Fairfield University. Drawing on her latest research, Dr. Tedone shares expert insights on safety voice and the pivotal role leaders play in fostering open safety communication to create safer workplaces. She discusses the importance of building a culture where every team member feels comfortable voicing their safety concerns and speaking up about potential risks. Tune in as Archana encourages leaders to take every safety concern seriously and without bias, actively listen and involve teams in problem-solving, demonstrate genuine care and appreciation, and close the feedback loop to strengthen safety communication. Join us to discover the power of safety voice and learn practical ways to build a culture of speaking up and drive meaningful change.

READ THE EPISODE

Real leaders leave a legacy. They capture the hearts and minds of their teams. Their origin story puts the safety and well-being of their people first. Great companies ubiquitously have safe, yet productive operations. For those companies, safety is an investment, not a cost for the C-suite. It’s a real topic of daily focus. This is the Safety Guru with your host, Eric Michrowski, a globally recognized ops and safety guru, public speaker and author. Are you ready to leave a safety legacy? Your legacy success story begins now.

Hi, and welcome to the Safety Guru. Today, I’m very excited to have back with us Dr. Archana Tedone. She’s Assistant Professor of Management at the Fairfield University, Dolan School of Business. Archana, it’s such a pleasure to have you back. I know we’ve had another conversation a few years back in a prior episode, and you’ve got some new research I’m really excited to talk about.

Oh, great. Thank you so much, Eric. It’s always a pleasure to be back. I love catching up with you and talking about safety. So, thanks for having me back.

Absolutely. So maybe if you could do a brief recap of your journey in safety, because you had a pretty amazing experiences around safety now in teaching management. And today we’re going to talk about predominantly safety voice, which is a really interesting topic to talk about. So maybe if you can start out with a bit of an intro to who you are and how you got here.

Yeah, I would love to do that. So yes. Thanks for having me. My name is Archna Tedone, as I mentioned, and I’m an assistant professor of management at Fairfield University. And I primarily currently teach courses around leadership at the undergrad level, the graduate level. But I wasn’t always here. Prior to becoming a professor, I was a consultant. I worked in people analytics for a bit. Prior to that, I worked with you all at I’m formerly census, and we did a lot of work in the safety space and training and development. And that’s really where my passion for safety, I would say, grew. I was in graduate school before that. I did a lot of safety-related research and looked at populations like nursing and health care and really thinking about how we promote safety communication, especially in high-risk and high-safety critical populations such as these. Sure. And I think Being able to work on projects related to safety training, safety development, safety culture assessments, it really made me start thinking about a lot of practical ways to apply the research that I was doing. Since then, I think I would say I’ve been primarily focused on workplace safety and the voice element of it and how we can better communicate safety issues in the workplace, even when things are stressful, times are tough, how do we still prioritize safety?

One of the topics that you touch on is this concept of safety voice. The last time we talked about upwards, downward, and peer-to-peer lateral communication. Tell me a little bit about what safety voice is and why it’s so critical.

Yeah. Safety voice, by definition, is this upward communication, or it could even be lateral, of safety issues that are occurring at work. Safety issues can mean not only reporting hazards or something along those lines, but it could also be communication around potential issues that you identify or potential violations that are happening. Any communication, preventative and change-oriented communication around safety in the workplace could be considered safety voice. It is absolutely critical to promote a workplace in which safety is not just an afterthought, but truly a priority. We are gathering information daily on how to make the workplace safer.

And ultimately, frontline team members know the work the best. They know the hazards the best. And so, we want to make sure they’re communicating, they’re being heard, and We’re creating an environment where we’re fostering this dialog, this information that’s coming up in the organization as well.

Yeah, absolutely. Leaders cannot be everywhere at once. And it is just impossible to expect a leader to have eyes everywhere all the time. So, think about it. If you are not on the floor as a leader and you don’t see something, if that is your only way of ensuring safe practices at work, then that’s a huge miss. You need to be able to build a team in which they feel responsible to promote their own safety and speak up about safety issues that are happening so you as a leader, can take those actions and ensure that things that need to be prevented can be before they result in some really bad outcomes.

I know you introduced this link back to social exchange theory, and you talked about the transactional elements, which was really powerful because it made me reflect a lot about when we say a psychologically safe environment where somebody speaks up, what does it really mean? Why is it that sometimes people won’t do it?

I think that when we think about any of these exchanges in the workplace, forget about safety, but just thinking about us as human beings, we are always weighing the pros and cons or the costs and benefits of all of our actions in all of the decisions that we make, what time we wake up in the morning. Is it more beneficial for me to hit the snooze button and get nine more minutes of sleep? Or is it more beneficial for me to wake up at this time? I’m weighing those maybe in a sleepy state, and it’s not as clear, but we are always thinking about the costs and the benefits, right? This also applies to safety-related situations. In our latest research on Safety Voice, which was a meta-analysis, we looked at voice through this framework of social exchange theory, and we identified, or we viewed voice through this transactional approach, thinking about how individuals weigh the costs and the benefits of voicing a safety concern. We might perceive costs like embarrassment. What if I speak up and my supervisor thinks I’m just this tattletale or My peers think I’m a snitch. What if I get it wrong?

Retaliation. What if I made a mistake and I speak up about it and somehow, I’m implicated in all of this? We might view those as costs. The benefits, of course, maybe I do prevent a safety issue from happening, and it could save us from potential harm. Maybe there is a positive change that comes out of me speaking up about this. Maybe my supervisor praises me and says, Hey, really great. Thank you for bringing that information to me. If I weigh those against one another, and I determine that, hey, the costs are outweighing the benefits of speaking up about the safety issue, then because I’m human, I might choose not to voice that issue.

I think for me, this was really powerful as a conversation starter, because we often say, well, you should speak up. I usually use an example of a plane that crashed in Portland, I think it was 50, 60 years ago. The scenarios, they were trying to check if they had their landing gear down. They were running out of fuel as they kept circling. I think it was the first officer and the flight engineer at the time, realized they were out of fuel, but neither dare to say anything to the captain. The captain kept circling until they crashed. You would think in a scenario like this, the cost-benefit would be cost is, if I don’t say something, really bad outcome, we’re going to crash, and the benefit would seem to be very high. But then you start understanding why is it it’s not happening? It’s not just that one plane event. There’s been lots of others flying to mountains, others running out of fuel where one of the two realizes but doesn’t feel comfortable speaking up. This forces you to think it’s actually about that person. That person is making decisions not about you, but also what do I need to do during increase the benefits, which I think comes into psychological safety and so forth.

Yes, absolutely. I think there’s one thing for certain that we all have very personal ways of thinking about costs and benefits. Eric, you and I could be looking at the same safety hazard in the workplace, right? Yeah. But to me, the cost of speaking up is not worth the benefit. To you, it might be. Absolutely. This is a very personal thing, and it’s hard to say, even in the example that you just brought up. For us, it might be easy to say, Yeah, of course. The benefit of speaking up about that is clear. But when you’re in that situation and when you’re looking at it from the eyes of a frontline employee, there could be so many other factors that they are considering in their cost-benefit ratio that we just aren’t thinking about or seeing.

Yeah. This gets us to thinking about what leaders can do to help tip this balance. How do we reinforce so there are more benefits in that decision-making? Because clearly, there’s value in speaking up, and there’s a significant risk when people don’t see the value in that cost-benefit equation.

Unfortunately, it’s not an overnight fix to be able to build this team, this climate, this culture in which speaking up about safety issues isn’t an abnormal experience. Ideally, we want to create this this team, this culture, this climate in which this type of communication is just normalized. It’s normal to speak up about hazards and communicate if you see anything that needs to be attended to and that your leader needs to know about. But getting there is not an overnight fix. I think a lot of it does start at this leadership level. I think one of the strongest drivers of employee behavior is truly leader behavior. So, role modeling behaviors you want to see as a leader, modeling transparency, modeling vulnerability, showing that, hey, I made a mistake, and this is the mistake I made, and this is how we are going to fix it. Saying that, hey, I’m not bulletproof, and I’m also making mistakes, and we’re all working together. Humanizing yourself as a leader and your team can be a great start. And I also think that in some other research that we did, we really understood the power of a leader in terms of role modeling behaviors.

Sure. Some of the strongest predictors of email behaviors after work hours in another line of work, we found, were the behaviors of one supervisor. Even in organizations with really strict policies around email use after hours, if your supervisor is emailing after hours, then you’re emailing after hours. Sure. The power in a leader should not be understated here, even when it comes to safety.

I think this is a really key point because the leaders can drive the equation. I think when you presented this to me the first time, we talked about cost-benefit. It really resonated because psychological safety looks at it from a broader sense. You have it versus here, it’s saying each person is making that decision individually. I need to think of it this way because some of those individuals create climate and culture. But it made me reflect that in some organizations, people weren’t speaking up because they shared an example of 35 years ago, the CEO responded some way differently. That CEO is long retired, long gone, but in their present memory, that’s their experience, or they work somewhere else where this wasn’t valued versus the next person. They clearly understand this is the expectation here. And that’s what we’re dealing with day in and day out.

Yes, absolutely. Since that CEO had left, if behavior from leadership hasn’t changed the ideas that workers have in their heads, that is the last thought that they have. Oh, there were these issues, the CEO did nothing, and now that’s just how it is. But what it takes to change that mentality is a leader who says, hey, I am going to close the loop on this safety issue. Thank you for raising that. I did X, Y, Z to try to address this issue, or I wasn’t able to address this issue, and this is why. Here’s what we can maybe think about in the future. Closing that loop ensures that your workers are continuing to voice because, again, we as humans, we tend to not want to waste our time or our breath. And so, if we keep speaking up and speaking up and it’s going nowhere, then what are we going to Stop speaking up. Stop speaking up, right?

Correct. And a story I often share is leaders can send very powerful signals. I remember when I started in aviation, I was in my early 20s, and I remember the first day on a blackboard, they were saying, number one, value, priority is safety. They would put big capital letters and underscore it and then say on time performance, all these other things come after, but permission to play is safety. This is the only thing that matters If you could get this right, the others matter. It’s a very binary message which you don’t often hear in most businesses. My thought was, and obviously they say speak up, raise concerns. You hear that, you say, okay, I need to do the right thing. But then when I actually did this and I stopped the operation because something was perceived to be unsafe, cost a lot of money, lots of zeros. Then the next day, what I discovered is the insights that I had when I called an all-stop, where actually there was no hazard present. It was completely benign, but new information came overnight that I didn’t have at that moment. I was sure that I was going to get terminated.

There was a lot of people in the airport that wanted my job terminated. But what was interesting in this signal that happened, the COO flew down that morning and gave me a very public attaboy that it was the only right thing to do. But he made it public so that essentially everybody else would get the signal that when we say safety, is number one, and not just number one, it’s permission to play, I mean it. From that day on, I realized I have permission to do this, and a lot of others heard it. I often challenged COO, CEO, CEO, CEO, CEO, to say, do you know about these things with that proximity? I have still no idea how he knew that morning he need to jump on a plane to do something. But that was incredibly powerful to set the stage for others.

That is so powerful. A little action like that can make big waves in the climate, the culture of an organization itself. These are the threads that start weaving the fabric of what safety culture looks like in your organization. So even these tiny little actions, these behaviors from leadership, can really make waves. And that is such a cool experience.

Exactly. And so, I think this is the thought for leaders is saying, how do I create signals to me as well that reinforce the pattern change? When we’re talking about the experience from 35 years ago, unless I see a definitive change in a pattern, I assume that’s still the case, even if the organization could have moved.

Yeah. And another thing that I want to add here is that what your CEO did could have easily looked like a performative gesture. I think we are very good at picking up on genuine actions and behaviors and genuine communications and things along those lines. And so backing up your words with visible actions can really show how safety concerns are taken seriously. If your CEO sent out an email saying, Hey, great job. Eric did a great job. This was exactly what needed to happen, might not have been as powerful as him jumping on a plane to really show that he appreciated what you did, and that is what you should have done and what others should be doing.

This episode of the Safety Guru podcast is brought to you by Propulo Consulting, the leading safety and safety culture advisory firm. Whether you are looking to assess your safety culture, develop strategies to level up your safety performance, introduce human performance capabilities, re-energize your BBS program, to enhance supervisory safety capabilities or introduce unique safety leadership training and talent solutions, Propulo has you covered. Visit us at propulo.com.

Great transition in terms of we’re going to touch on essentially what should leaders do? So, one of the things is take fast action. I like what you’re talking about. It has to feel genuine because if it’s just written by Corp Coms, it’s not necessarily genuine or having the same impact. You also touched earlier in terms of you need to take action with that feedback, but you can’t always take action. So, what are some of the other things that leaders can do to make sure that they’re reinforcing this pattern?

Yeah. So, a few things come to mind here. One is, I think it’s important for leaders to really take every concern seriously. And by seriously, I mean, even concerns that seem minor or seem like, why is this person bringing this to my attention? This is not a big deal. Forming some checklist or guidelines for yourself on how to evaluate these voices. That helps us stay away from any biases that might come to mind saying, oh, I already thought about that, or this is not a big deal, or this person always comes and speaks up, and they’re one of those people, right? So naturally, as humans, some of these biases might creep in when we’re evaluating voice, right? So, having some standard, having a checklist saying, okay, for every concern that comes up, I’m going to evaluate it around these three elements, right? So, deciding that with your leadership team and thinking about how to best evaluate, engage the action taken on voice can be really helpful.

Sure.

And two, as I mentioned earlier, the genuine piece of actively listening to the individuals that are bringing this to your attention, even if it seems minor, even if it seems like not a big deal, genuinely being able to thank them, whether it’s getting on a plane and flying down or thanking them and showing genuine appreciation for the behavior that they’re engaging in because you want them to repeat that behavior. We repeat behaviors that we feel like are positive and rewarded in some way. And so, if your supervisor is praising you for bringing this up, then you’re going to continue to do that. Right. Third, as I mentioned before, closing the loop is probably the most important. Following through either with a formal investigation, some action plan on things that you think could actually need to be changed and implemented. But most importantly, for even voice that it seems like things that you can’t take action around at the moment or things that might be non-issues, communicating that back to individuals, why you’re not taking action on this and why you’re not able to implement any changes right now. And in this way, employees will almost self-screen from there, knowing with more knowledge, okay, maybe these sorts of things are what I need to be voicing.

Those employees that are consistently voicing, the more feedback and guidance you give them around their voice, the better they’ll get at it and get you the information you need. Sure.

I think this feedback loop you talk about is incredibly important because it’s showing that I did some due diligence, and I think I see it a little bit more when you actually action something, but it’s often easy to forget when you can’t do something. But just like you Instead of closing the loop and saying why we can’t do it. As an example, if I’ve heard it was one organization, they wanted to customize trucks to add some additional bells and whistles, cost was exorbitant, and the exposure to that risk was probably 5% of the fleet needed it. But maybe you can tweak the recommendation and say, well, what if we only did it for a handful of trucks in the fleet, as an example, the ones that are exposed to that particular hazard, or just saying, we can’t do it now, but We have in the budget for next year. Even something like that that may not sound as positive is still explaining what we’re doing with that information.

Yes, absolutely. I also, to some extent, would suggest and support leaders involving their team in problem solving, right? Yeah, I love that. If there are hazards on the floor and your team is the one who is working with these hazards daily, they probably have ideas on what to do and how to best approach these situations. Closing the loop can look something like, hey, let’s chat in my office a little bit about your thoughts on how to address this problem, right? And that also helps build psychological safety and trust and helps your team feel like they’re part of the conversation and not just they are to communicate information. It involves them more in this whole process, which gets them to buy into why voice is important, too.

Absolutely. Even just problem solving on the shop floor, I’ve seen like A3s or Kaizen type events where you’re saying, okay, would you be willing to be part of the how we solve this? It can be hugely powerful because now you’re saying, okay, I’m taking your I’m engaging and involving you in solving it. Maybe even, ideally, you actually get to the building the change, implementing the change, as opposed to just the ideation part.

Absolutely. I think oftentimes, hazards and safety issues are already creatively addressed on the floor, right? If they’re not voiced up to you. There’s all of these innovative, creative ways that teams decide to work around or manage some of these safety issues. And you as a leader, if you’re working with them to craft a solution to these issues, you as a leader can be that voice of protocol of it. Because sometimes they might not know violations that they might be engaging in or why certain things can’t happen certain ways. So, if they are willing to invite you into that conversation on how to be safe and still be able to get work done, because oftentimes we see that safety is viewed as this obstacle that they have to cross to get their work done. If you’re able to gain trust and enter those conversations on, how do we make this work for everyone, that’s a really special thing. The more you involve your team, the more they might want to involve you in these conversations as well.

Absolutely. I also like how you touched on the element of biases, because we all have biases. There are great articles have been written on this side. But often what I hear is that bias subtly introducing itself in the decision making. I label this person as quickly wheel because they always complain, this is dangerous, this is risky, E, et cetera. And so, by default, I start automatically tuning out what they say, which is not helpful. It’s not going to encourage safety voice as you’re introducing, but also it could be very dangerous because now I’m not listening to that person’s feedback. And maybe they were a little bit dramatic the last time, but maybe this time is actually the time you need to listen. And so, your idea of having more of a decision matrix or some a checklist to think through, tries to help you overcome the bias and maybe even getting people, I think, to recognize that I may have a bias towards this individual. How do I compensate for it?

Yes, absolutely. I think us, again, as humans, we may be tempted to discount individuals that are more frequently reporting that we view as not important or not achievable and view as more of complaints rather than anything actionable, essentially. But as leaders, it’s so important to assess the message and not just the messenger.

Sure.

Again, as we discussed already, creating some structured way to track and review this safety inputs can be absolutely important to make sure that nothing is really overlooked due to some of these biases. But we do, I think we, again, being human, understanding that we have these biases is such a great first step of knowing that, hey, am I not excited about hearing what this person has to say? Because they were just five minutes ago? Or is it for some other reason? I think also on the flip side of that, we do also… It’s completely fine to place differential weights on opinions that we hear. As human beings, we have people that we really trust, and when they say something, we place a lot of weight on that opinion. However, when it comes to reports and information about safety, it It’s a whole norther ball game. Having some standardized system in which we can evaluate, quickly evaluate and judge a decision matrix, a checklist, some guidelines, will help bring us away from that state of mind. And put us in a more objective evaluation mentality where we can really look at the issue and not the person reporting the issue.

I also think what you talked about a few seconds ago about as you get involved in the problem solving and they’re hearing the rationale and we’re starting to think about how do we turn this problem into a solution, you’re indirectly also training people to come up with more comprehensive problems with solutions, but also the type of things that are actionable.

Yes, absolutely. I would even encourage praising problem-solving behavior and thinking. If you have a team member that approaches you and says, hey, this is a big safety hazard, and this is what we figured out to fix it, and it’s completely a terrible idea, still praise them for thinking in that way, for trying to think in a way to solve the problem at hand. Sure. That’s where you’ll get so much idea generation. You’ll get so many interesting, innovative ways to solve issues that make everyone happy. I think that’s the issue with some safety policies and procedures and protocols. It’s that They struggle with making everyone happy. Maybe they make us on the leadership side happy, but not necessarily those on the floor or vice versa. Getting to a solution that makes all parties happy can happen more easily when all of these parties are involved in the crafting of the solution.

Such a powerful message. Safety voice is so critical in business because we want those that are closest to the work to highlight risk, highlight issues, highlight solutions, and be involved in improving the workplace. I really like your message around social exchange theory and this element that it’s really a cost-benefit transaction that’s happening multiple times in somebody’s head. That means we need to tip the balance more in favor of speaking up, which is really a leadership ownership responsibility that we need to foster.

Yeah. I think also as leaders, being aware that costs and benefits differ across individuals and understanding how others evaluate costs and benefits, right, can be really a powerful way to look at scenarios and situations as well.

Yeah, because it’s not like an accountant who’s got a spreadsheet that shares a spreadsheet and all the models in front of you. It’s what’s going on inside of you. Exactly. It’s prior experiences, it’s prior work environments. There’s a lot of things that you don’t have control over that are coming into that equation.

Yeah. I think building a space in which speaking up about safety issues doesn’t feel like voice. It doesn’t feel like you’re voicing anything. It just feels like you’re having a conversation. And that’s the gold standard, I think. Getting to that place can be so ideal for the exchange of ideas, information, and issues, and being able to take preventative action, which is what we all want to do, right?

Yes. Thank you so much, Archana. Thank you for coming back on the podcast, and you’re welcome to come back anytime when you’ve got some new ideas to share. I really appreciate you sharing this. Thank you.

Thank you for having me, Eric. Always great to be here.

Thank you for listening to The Safety Guru on C-suite Radio. Leave a legacy. Distinguish yourself from the past. Grow your success. Capture the hearts and minds of your teams. Elevate your safety. Like every successful athlete, top leaders continuously invest in their safety leadership with an expert coach to boost safety performance. Begin your journey at execsafetycoach.com. Come back in two weeks for the next episode with your host, Eric Michrowski. This podcast is powered by Propulo Consulting.

ABOUT THE GUEST

Archana M. Tedone, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor of Management in the Dolan School of Business at Fairfield University. Her research examines workplace communication, with a particular focus on the factors that encourage or discourage communication about safety issues and concerns. Drawing from occupational health psychology and organizational behavior, she studies how leaders can create climates that promote open communication, trust, and proactive safety behaviors in high-stress environments such as healthcare and hybrid teams.

Her research has been funded by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and published in leading academic journals, with findings presented at national and international conferences. She serves on the editorial board of Occupational Health Science and on the Executive Board of the Society for Occupational Health Psychology. In addition to her academic work, Dr. Tedone continues to consult with organizations to strengthen safety culture, leadership effectiveness, and communication practices. She is passionate about creating workplaces where employees feel empowered to speak up, collaborate, and thrive safely.

For more information: https://www.fairfield.edu/academics/majors-and-minors/management/faculty/

RELATED EPISODE

STAY CONNECTED

The Safety Guru with Eric Michrowski

More Episodes: https://thesafetyculture.guru/

C-Suite Radio: https://c-suitenetwork.com/the-safety-guru/

Powered By Propulo Consulting: https://propulo.com/

Eric Michrowski: https://ericmichrowski.com

EXECUTIVE SAFETY COACHING

Like every successful athlete, top leaders continuously invest in their Safety Leadership with an expert coach to boost safety performance.

Safety Leadership coaching has been limited, expensive, and exclusive for too long.

As part of Propulo Consulting’s subscription-based executive membership, our coaching partnership is tailored for top business executives that are motivated to improve safety leadership and commitment.
Unlock your full potential with the only Executive Safety Coaching for Ops & HSE leaders available on the market.
Explore your journey with Executive Safety Coaching at https://www.execsafetycoach.com.
Executive Safety Coaching_Propulo

The Debrief Culture: Human Factors Leadership for Accountability and Learning with Brandon Williams

The Debrief Culture: Human Factors Leadership for Accountability and Learning with Brandon Williams

LISTEN TO THE EPISODE: 

ABOUT THE EPISODE

We welcome back Brandon Williams, former fighter pilot and seasoned expert in human factors and safety leadership, for another profound episode of The Safety Guru that you won’t want to miss! In this intriguing conversation, we explore The Debrief Culture, a powerful approach rooted in the debriefing method and mindset of elite fighter pilots that transforms organizational performance and builds a culture of continuous improvement. Drawing on his experience in high-stakes aviation environments, Brandon shares insights on creating a structured debrief culture that can be applied across industries to drive consistent accountability, clear communication, continuous learning, and sustainable growth. Tune in for a contemplative discussion on human factors leadership for accountability and learning, as Brandon unpacks actionable, practical strategies to help leaders build an effective debrief culture that fosters a high-growth mindset, combats complacency, and drives learning from both wins and missteps. Join us!

READ THE EPISODE

Real leaders leave a legacy. They capture the hearts and minds of their teams. Their origin story puts the safety and well-being of their people first. Great companies ubiquitously have safe yet productive operations. For those companies, safety is an investment, not a cost. For the C-Suite, it’s a real topic of daily focus. This is the Safety Guru with your host, Eric Michrowski, a globally recognized ops and safety guru, public speaker and author. Are you ready to leave a safety legacy? Your legacy success story begins now.

Hi and welcome to the Safety Guru. Today I’m very excited to have with me Brandon Williams, who’s back for a second episode. He’s a former U.S. air Force fighter pilot with over two decades of experience leading teams in complex high-risk environments. He’s now a captain with a major airline and is a safety and human factors expert. Brandon, really happy to have you back with me. Our first episode, I think got a lot of interest, so would love to continue the conversation today.

Awesome. Well, Eric, again, thanks for having me back on the podcast. Like you said a few years ago now, but it was, it was a great talk. I remember we had a lot of good discussion there. And as always, I love talking about, you know, anything safety, human factors related because as I’m sure we’ll get into it and as you know, critically important and high reliability in these churches. But really anything you do; human factors is always at play. And so, for leaders, understanding that is so important. So again, thank you for having me on.

Absolutely. So, so maybe let’s start there. I want to make sure we spend a lot of time today on Debrief Culture. But before, let’s do a bit of a recap in terms of what is human factors. I know we talked about it in our first episode, but let’s start there. 

Yeah. Well, anyone in the safety world, most people probably know about human factors, right? Typically, it’s associated with an engineering concept. You know, the idea of engineering technology for the human to interact with it. So, you know, these laptops were on the chairs we’re sitting in the desk, we’re sitting in the cars we drive, the airplanes I fly, you know, everything had all those pieces of technology, had some human factors designed into it, how the humans going to interact with that. And so, it takes into account all of our human factors and human errors that we’re prone to. You know, for example, from the flying world, you know, a red light goes off or master warning caution. Why is that bright and yellow right in front of my face? Because that’s going to get my attention right away. Right. Same thing in your car. Right. I mean, why don’t we have, you know, the, the, the modern cars now with the sensors on the front and the back, which will alert you to you’re about to hit something, and a lot of them now will even start braking for you if it says you’re going to hit this type thing.

So that’s how far we’ve come in human factors, you know, engineering, design and technology. Well, what I’ve taken from that, you know, a few years ago when I came up with this idea of human factors leadership was, hey, look, we talk about human factors all the time in, you know, how we design things, how we design procedures. But I said we don’t really always consider it. When we think about our teams. Sure. I don’t think. Or how we had signed our teams, or how leaders have to understand human factors of their people. And when we talk safety, obviously that’s a huge idea. I mean, human factors really have become, you know, what aviation safety is all about. You know, understanding that when someone shows up to work, a professional, no one shows up saying, hey, I’m going to make a mistake today. I’m going to make a bad decision that’s going to result in a bad outcome. I mean, nobody shows up. I don’t show up to my job, you know, as a major airline pilot, saying, hey, I’m going to miss a switch or I’m going to do this. No, but it’s because of those human factors, right, that drives us there, that, you know, our limitations as humans.

But hey, that’s okay because that’s what makes us human. At the end of the day, you know, my talks always like to say, you know, raise your hand if you’ve never made a mistake.

And I do the same. One person is their hand once.

There’ll be a few people that don’t. And I like to, and I always like to kind of point say, congratulations, this is amazing. You’ve never made a mistake. That’s phenomenal. But, but it’s so true. But that’s what makes us human. Right? And I think there’s. This is another conversation, but I think, you know, that human factor, I think that’s actually going to become more important in this world we’re in now as AI starts to become way more involved in what we do. That human touch, if you will, I think it’s going to be even more valuable in so many other industries. But that’s another conversation. But the human factors, like you said and like we’re talking about, is really why we as humans make decisions in certain environments. Right. And so, from a safety standpoint, just a pure technical safety standpoint, that’s critical in understanding how we design our procedures, our process, as, you know, our safety gaps, you know, in the system. For example, me as a, again, major airline pilot, I think there are four areas where I check my flap settings required to before we even take off. Why? Because that’s such a critical feature.

And in the, you know, many, many years we’ve had airplanes with flaps, we’ve had pilots take off within proper flap settings, unfortunately, some that have resulted in accidents. And so that’s a critical feature which we have many checks and balances, I call it, in the system that requires us to. To check that in in many different areas. So just an example how you design a process. Right. But as leaders, it’s also critical to understand, you know, these things like fatigue, mental and physical complacency, you know, normalization of deviance, which I know people in safety understand what that is. But, you know, we. This idea that we cut corners a little bit. A little bit. A little bit, A little bit. And then what happens, you know, this cutting the corner becomes the norm, and now there’s a set procedure that’s been knocked out, not because we, you know, we’re not. We want to willfully disregard rules, but because we thought we were doing something good to make something better. But in actuality, we’re deviating from a standard procedure, right. In our brain, it says, hey, I’m doing something more efficient. But the problem is we’re missing gaps or checks and balances supposed to help us, you know, do something.

So human factors really go back to, again, Eric, understanding why we as humans make decisions in certain environments, but also as leaders designing our teams and processes to help our people, you know, mitigate those human errors and those human factors. So, we do ultimately drive better performance. Because at the end of the day, you know, better performance, whether its safety is what, you know, no mishaps, you know, no injuries, no damaged equipment, machinery. But also, for any team, performance is critical. Right. So, at the end of the day, it’s all about driving better performance.

And to get to that better performance, one of the pieces you’ve written lots of articles, lots of blogs on, is the debrief concept. That’s really, really key in. In aviation fighter pilots. And I want to get to a debrief culture. But before we go there, maybe if you could share a little bit about what a debrief is.

Right, absolutely. And. And I’m glad you brought that up because you’re right, there’s a few different parts of what I talk about when you talk about this, human factors, leadership. But the debrief, I think is probably, in my opinion, the most powerful piece of this. And it’s kind of what I finish on when I do my keynotes, because it’s a really great idea to finish on. And debrief is all about the debrief. At the end of the day, all it’s, its whole entire purpose is to, like I said earlier, is to drive better performance for the team, period. Dot. I mean, that’s, that’s what it’s all about now, how you get there and what’s involved in that debrief. There is a structure that we have and there’s a way you do that, but at the end of the day, you know, that’s what it’s all about. And so, you know, when we talk about safety, when we talk about, you know, whatever industry you’re in, what are we trying to do? You know, if you’re trying to make better safety metrics, you’re trying to design better, safer processes, you’ve got to find a way that really pulls out those gaps in the system.

Right. You’ve got to find a way that is going to bring this to light.

Sure.

Now, any good safety system, any good reliable safety program has what a very open, you know, reporting system or should some way that, that, you know, your frontline leaders, frontline people can report, hey, here’s an issue I see. Here’s a gap in the system I see. Right. You’ve got to have that. So that’s one piece of it which can be incorporated into debriefs. But the other piece of that is debriefing after tasks, projects, you know, whatever, whatever you’re doing. So immediately after that we can talk about some, some things maybe that didn’t go right or some things that did go right. That’s a key piece of debrief. We debrief after everything, even, especially after things go right, because we discover near misses. We want to get best practices out of that. Right. But the whole point of that debrief is to set an environment where we can get open and honest. That’s the key piece there. Open and honest, a tone of accountability, I call it open and honest inputs from that so that we can ultimately drive better performance, get lessons learned out of that and drive that back. Now, I know a lot of people are saying, well, we do this, we have after actions or we have Debriefs or we, you know, we have, you know, team huddles or we do this after, you know, this or that and that.

And I think it’s great that people are, are leaning towards that way. You know, I see that a lot in healthcare. I work with a lot of hospitals, and I’ll ask them, hey, do you debrief after this? Like, well, you know, after code blues or maybe after major procedure surgery or after this, we’ll talk and I’ll ask them, okay, well, how do you do that? You know, and, and a lot of times, well, we get the team together and I’m like, who runs the debrief? Like, typically it’s the, you know, the attending physician or the surgeon or, you know, you know, whatever, or the lead nurse or, you know, whatever, whoever was in that, that task. And I’m like, okay, would you get honest feedback? You know, does it go well? Typically, you know, whoever’s leading it would just say, hey, here’s what happened, and anybody got anything? And you know, maybe sometimes someone will say something and, okay, great, you know, let’s, let’s go about our day and, you know, maybe they’ll learn something out of that and then we’ll move on. So, which the good. The part of that, I mean, it’s great they do that and there is learning that happens in those.

And that’s important. But I think the key piece and what makes the debrief, the fighter pilot debriefs, which is where I got this idea from, so different than anything else you’ve ever heard that’s similar to this is how you set that tone of accountability. Okay. How you set that tone where we bring down those barriers to communication and everyone, all the way down to the most junior member on that team feels like they can speak up. And it’s this mindset that we’re not trying to. It’s not a. Don’t think of it as an individual evaluation. Right? What I always say, we’re trying to get away from that blame and train feel that we, I think we’ve, we’re so accustomed to, in, in the professional world, to a learning and growing mindset, right? It’s not about evaluation. It’s not about individual performance. This is purely about what happened, why it happened, and how we’re going to make things better for the team next time. Not just our team, but anyone in our organization. Maybe there’s things we need to change. Maybe there’s things we need to take back to leadership, some processes and some learning that’s going to happen out of that.

But that’s the key, you know, the key difference, I think, in anything else that, you know, you’ve seen when you, when you talk about what happened and why it happened. But it’s. You’ve got to have that, like I said, open, honest tone of accountability type, type environment.

And so how. How do you go about introducing this in your culture? Right, because this is through and through aviation.

Right.

Probably at least Since World War I, from what I’ve, I’ve heard in, in terms of the history, it’s ingrained. But how do you start building that into a culture? You talked about healthcare as an example.

Right, right. And that’s a great question, too, because that’s one of the biggest, you know, questions I get from teams that I work with. And they say, well, you know, this is great, Brandon, but I mean, how do you, how do you get people to be open and honest, you know, talk about their missteps or missteps of their peers or even leaders sometimes in these. And I said, that’s a great, great question. And like you said, your kind of just alluded to one. And actually, just so you know, the fighter pilot debris kind of goes back to the Vietnam era, is where we trace this back to when, when we realized fighter pilots were realizing that, hey, if you make it through 10 missions, these young fighter pilots coming over, they made it through 10 missions, their chance of survival exponentially went up. Why? Because after 10 missions, you. That’s experience you’re gaining, right? And so, they said, how can we accelerate that learning? How could we get every ounce of learning out of combat and training missions? So, we kind of simulate this first 10 missions. And so first it was, hey, we’re going to make our training as realistic as we can, which we learned from that.

And then things like Red Flag out Nilis, that all came about. But the other key piece was the debrief. You know, how do we accelerate learning? And we’re going to debrief; we’re going to reconstruct what happened and we’re going to find the root causes. And that’s why we as fighter pilots hold it so near and dear, because we said the real learning always happens in the debrief. I mean, yes, you got to have experience, but when we learn what happened and why it happened, that happens in the debrief. So that’s the first piece is you’ve got to do it. It’s got to be part of. That’s why I call it a debrief. Culture, it’s got to be part of how you do things. Because as we know as humans, the more we do something, what happens? The better we get at it, the better we. More we get used to it, right? I mean, you know, again, going back to the Air Force as a fighter pilot from day one of pilot training, you know, brand new, never many times, a lot of us, hardly any aviation experience whatsoever. We go out, we fly that first man.

What do we do when we first come back? We debrief. And then from there on out, every single sortie you do as an Air Force pilot, you will debrief. So literally thousands of debriefs I’ve done just as a, you know, fighter pilot in my time. So that’s the first thing, is making it how you do business, right? And it doesn’t even have to be this thing where we go and shut the door and sit down and, you know, talk for an hour or 30 minutes. I do this a lot with. Sometimes I work with sales teams, and I do this all the time. I say, hey, look, you can debrief after a sales call. Just sit down. If you had another team member you and. Or maybe you went and had a sales pitch, sit down, you know, take. Go to a cup of coffee, sit down, 15, 20 minutes, just talk about it. You know, what happened? Why did this happen? What could we do different next time? You know, so it’s. It’s this idea of ingraining it and how you do business, you know, ingraining it in a tool for your. For your teams to use.

So that’s the first thing is making it part of your culture, like you said. And then the second thing, you know, the second major part of this is, is like most things, I mean, shockingly, guess where it starts is, is with leadership, right? With. With team leaders, with organizational leaders. Because you as a leader have to do what. You have to show your own transparency and accountability. And if you are involved in a debrief, you’ve got to be one of the first people to speak up and talk about your missteps and talk about things, you know, you’ve done or you could have done better for the team. You know, the. The Blue Angels debrief that I’ve. I’ve talked about. There’s one. The reason I show. It’s about a minute and a half clip that I show my keynotes a lot of times, and I know I’ve given you access to that, so you can go watch that. But I think the key part of that is before they even start talking about their execution and, you know, watching the tape and trying to. What they could have done better and what they need to improve on.

They go around the room, they call it a safety. And each one of them, each member on that team fesses up to some things they, you know, didn’t do well that day or they could have done better. Like they were off air speed, their power control wasn’t good. They did this, they did all the way up to the team leader. The boss says that, you know, what they could have done better. And what’s the whole purpose of that, Eric, is purely just to bring down those barriers to communication. Right. I mean, we’re talking the Blue Angels, right? So, like, best of the best type A individuals, right, that. That, you know, essentially the best at what they do. And so. But I think it’s so powerful. The one key thing I pass on to my clients and people I work with is, hey, especially leaders, again, going back to this, what you have to have in organization is leaders that are transparent, leaders that hold themselves accountable, and leaders that bring down that, you know, those barriers, communication by, again, things I could have done better for you as a team. And I know you’ve probably been part of teams where you’ve seen this and how powerful that is when you have a leader that can do that.

And then also how extremely demoralizing it is when you. That. That can’t do that or even worse, you know, will kind of point out the errors of their team members, you know, without, you know, talking about their own. Their own missteps. So that. That’s the Q2 key pieces, though, is making it part of your culture, how you do it, you know, so people get used to it. But also having that tone of accountability within your organization, starting at the top.

And it does require very high growth mindset. Right. Because people have to recognize that, yeah, I’ve done this a million times, but I can do this better.

Right.

In aviation, there’s really this mindset of it’s an unforgiving environment. Once I’m up in the air, if something goes wrong, I need to know as much as I can.

Right.

That mindset of growth, and that can always get better isn’t always present in every organization. So how do you overcome that?

Yeah, that growth mindset, I think that goes back to, you know, again, realizing what you do. Right. And. And kind of like you said, you know, we always say, like you said, I love you. You talked about aviation’s unforgiving. You know, it’s the Famous quote is. I’m not even sure who said it, but we talk about all the time is aviation itself is not inherently dangerous, but it’s incredibly unforgiving, you know, incredibly unforgiving. What does that mean? Just like you said, you know, if you ever get into that complacent mindset of, I know it all, I’ve seen it all, you know, aviation has a way of throwing things at you that you never in a million years would have trained for, it would have thought for. I mean, there’s. You go back and look at so many incidents, so many. I don’t know if you remember back in the. Was it late 80s, the Sioux City DC10 with engine failure and how they had to. Or, sorry, the flight controls where it burned through the hydraulics, and they basically controlled the airplane with the power. Now, unfortunately, there was some loss of life, but they saved a lot of people, too.

And there’s so many things that came out of that, you know, crew coordination, how they did that working, you know, just so many things. But the point of that is, like they said when they. When that first happened, and the captain, he’s talking to, you know, back to his operations center, and they’ve got the engineers on the line and like, well, that can’t happen. And he’s like, well, I’m telling you, this is what’s happened. It severed our lines. We have no idea. They’re like, well, that can’t happen. It’s not designed that way. You’re like, well, this happened. So, it just. Aviation has a, you know, an incredibly sick sense of humor, of humbling you. And even the thousands and thousands of hours you have throwing things at you, whether it’s decision making, you know, aircraft issues, you name it, of throwing something at you. So, I think to you. To you. Back to your question is this idea of, you know, always say, you know, the number one enemy of all this stuff of. Of situation awareness, as we call it, of getting better is always complacency. And I think it’s. It’s. It’s a natural human instinct to be complacent.

I mean, that’s where we want to be. We. We. Our human mindset goes back to, you know, comfort, right? Once we get everything solid, we have food, we have water, we have shelter. Okay, now I can relax a little bit, right? It’s what you want to do. So, I think what I always tell people is this constant. I use this term, healthy paranoia sometimes, because it’s this idea that I got, again, I got from aviation, you Know what could go wrong? What have I not thought about? I mean, you’re not always paranoid, but you are in the back of your mind, little mind, that little thing of, what have we not done? What if? What have we not thought about? Hey, if I’m flying along here, if this engine does fail, where’s my closest piece of concrete I’d set this airplane down at, right? And so, I think that’s what it goes back to, is leaders having that heightened sense of situational awareness and also passing on to our people of, hey, what have we not thought about? Are we getting complacent? Because that’s a key part, again, of human factors, is again, we want to be comfortable, we want to be complacent.

Unfortunately, it’s where our mindset goes. But it’s this idea of never falling into that trap of getting completely complacent because as we know, that’s where mistakes are going to happen, right? That’s where this human error is going to seep in. That’s when something’s going to happen. So, I think it’s always going back to understanding. We haven’t. We don’t know everything. We haven’t seen everything. You know, like, just like your example earlier of, hey, I’ve done this thousand times. We’ve never had anything bad happen. Why would it happen now? And that’s when something’s going to happen, which I know you’ve probably seen this your world, but that’s one of the main reasons people would argue against, you know, safety programs. Like, we’ve done this for so long and nothing bad has ever happened. Which, as we know, that’s never a. It only takes one bad incident to, you know, unfortunately hurt someone or, you know, lose money or lose your business. So, I think it’s this idea of combating that complacency and thinking, you know, what have we not thought about and what do we need to learn? Where do we need to grow?

This episode of the Safety Guru podcast is brought to you by Propulo Consulting, the leading safety and safety culture advisory firm. Whether you are looking to assess your safety culture, develop. Develop strategies to level up your safety performance, introduce human performance capabilities, re-energize your BBS program, enhance supervisory safety capabilities, or introduce unique safety leadership training and talent solutions. Propulo has you covered. Visit [email protected].

It’s interesting you bring up Sioux City, because recently I came across, I was looking at the Japan Airline mass decompression on 747. That happened a couple years before and apparently one of the pilots, I believe they were deadheading on the flight, or they might have been a passenger had been studying. Exactly. And run multiple scenarios on the 747 where they had lost the rotors, go stabilizers and so forth. He right away came to give some advice because he had run 50, 60 simulations of how I would handle the same scenario of mass decompression, loss of hydraulics.

Yeah.

And that plane I think was flying for 32 minutes with very limited control, with no hydraulics.

That’s interesting. Yeah. There was a pilot who came up and helped and assisted with the power. He was like you said, I think he was just as. Or I know he was just a passenger, but yeah, you’re correct. I didn’t know that about that. That’s awesome. Unbelievable. 

But that, that’s, it’s incredible because it shows you’re expecting something to go wrong. Nobody’s expecting that. You have total loss of your hydraulics.

Right, right. And a key part of my, you know, outside of the debrief, but that’s why I incorporate in my planning model kind of that last piece. I always say the what ifs, you know, what are the what ifs? And now you could sit, you know, you could sit here all day and talk about what ifs. Right. I mean, what if, what if zombies come back and you know, But I, I say, you know, just take a few minutes. It’s a way for the team to re cage after you’ve been so involved in this planning process and say, okay, let’s step back, let’s think about what, you know, what have we not thought about? What could be the one thing that throws this, you know, a curveball. One of the most common things is what if our, what if someone on our team puts in their two weeks’ notice tomorrow, you know, or something like that, or what? You know, just things like that that you don’t think about. You’re like, that’s a good idea, let’s talk about that. But that’s my key piece is always, you know, take a minute and just think about, let’s think about some major what ifs here which helps us become.

What helps us become more proactive versus reactive to those changes.

Interesting. One of the things, because some people work alone you talk about is also you can do a self-debrief. Tell me a little bit about what that would look like.

Absolutely. Well, you know, debriefing implies that the team should be involved and a lot of times you do need someone else to, you know, point out some Errors or missteps for the team. But let’s be honest, a lot of times we know, whether we want to admit it or not, we know our own, you know, mistakes we did or maybe a way we could have done something better. I mean, think about it, you know, as humans say, you have a negative interaction with a, with a co-worker or, you know, another person, and later on you’re thinking about that, it may even be that night, and you’re like, you know what? Probably could have handled that a little differently. I probably should have done this and said this, and it probably wouldn’t have blown up. Or I probably should have said it like this. Or maybe they got what they wanted, and you were in a bit of a minor negotiation. You’re like, you know, what if I would have done this, then probably would have ended a little better. So, we all do that right after the fact. Why? Because it’s again, this goes back to human factors.

That survival mechanism in our, in our brain always wants us to win. So, it’s always trying to find ways we could have done something better. And so I turn that into, I say, look, you know, even after, you know, minor interact, things like what I just talked about, interaction with co-workers, a task you’ve done on your own, you know, you can do this with your, you know, things around the house, projects you’ve done and just self-debrief, you know, be honest with yourself, hey, here’s what happened. Here’s you know, why it happened and really dig deep, you know, whether it’s the five whys technique of asking why five times and trying to get to that. We call that really deep level, prop, root cause, causal factor, as I always say, and really find down to that root. So, we can do that and then take that back and say, you know, next time, here’s how I could do that. You know, next time, here’s some things I can take back. And again, this can be done, you know, in your personal life, in your professional life. There are so many different areas. And I do this all the time.

I mean, after a keynote, you know, with it, with a client, I always love to say, if they had any video of it, I always say, can I get a copy of that? And what I do is I sit down, I’ll watch it, kind of go through it one time first just to kind of see big picture. Okay, here’s how it went. And then I’ll go through it and stop and say, okay, take notes. Okay. You know, my hand motion was, was poor. Here I Need to stress this word more. My voice inflection or I was talking too fast at this point or change this to this. This sounds. Probably sounds better. Relook at how you tell this story or just. And every time I do that, I find little bits and pieces on how I can make it better. And so even though if a keynote goes well and the great client loves it, there’s always ways, you know, I can improve and, you know, drive my better performance. And that’s one way I do it. So, I think, you know, debris with a team is always the best or someone else that you can deeper foot.

But I think solve degree boosts are incredibly valuable for people.

And I think really like what you’re talking about. It’s, it’s really about learning not just from failure, but from success to say, how can we get to continuous improvement? I think your tagline is learn, adapt, improve around the debrief checklist.

Totally.

But it’s very much this mindset, we can always get better.

Absolutely. And I think that’s. That goes back to everything. Right. You know, I mean, I always say in my thousands and thousands and thousands of flying, I would have never had the perfect flight. So, I don’t think I probably ever will. But we, we strive to get there. Right. It’s like the Vince Lombardi quote I love kind of defines us. It’s like perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence. Right. So, you’re always trying to, to, you know, find that perfect flight. Always trying. You probably won’t get there, but in that pursuit, we’re making ourselves better. And that goes in any industry. Anything you do, I think is 100% right. That mindset of growth and performance improvement and as safety professionals especially, why I love working with these teams is because, I mean, let’s face it, in safety, you’re always trying to improve, right? We’re always trying to drive better. You know whether it’s metrics you’re concerned with or you’re just trying to find, you know, drive better safety outcomes, better ways to do things, better processes that incorporate safety, but without, you know, harming the business and things like that.

So, I think that’s, you know, just as that inherently that’s what you’re always doing in that role.

So, one of the quotes you, you talk about in your speeches on debrief is this concept of artificial harmony versus respectful truth. Tell me a little bit about the difference between both.

Well, yeah, so I talked earlier about that, that tone of accountability as I called it. So, remember, you know, where do we, as humans typically live? We want to avoid conflict for the most part, right? And so where are we typically at in that artificial harmony? You know, think about it. You know, when you, you know, I just talked about this with my, my kids the other day. We were talking about different cultures, and I’m like, you know how we say, hey, how are you doing? You pass someone on the street or, hey, how’s it going? I’m like, do you really honestly care, like, if you don’t know, especially, like, now? Sometimes we do. Maybe you call a family member or friend and they’ve been sick, hey, how you doing? Like, and you can tell with the body language and voice, but when we say, hey, how you doing? I’m like, I talk to my kids. I’m like, do you really honestly think we care, like, how they’re doing? I mean, it’s reading almost like it’s like saying, hi, we’re being nice and respectful and kind, but it’s a greeting. I said, you know, in other cultures, I was saying for a journey, for example, I said, when someone asks you how you’re doing, they’re honestly wanting to know, like, how are you doing?

Like, as other cultures, they really, they don’t just use it as a, as a, you know, as a greeting. So, so going back to that, that’s kind of that, you know, artificial harmony, right? Think about a cocktail party, you know, where you ask people and I talk, I tell my kid, you know, how to win friends and influence people, right? Type thing of. What do you always do? Ask. You ask them how they’re doing; you ask people about them. You know, you’re trying to build that rapport, right? So, it’s, where do we try to be? We try to avoid that conflict. So that’s that respectful or sorry, that’s that artificial harmony. Some or manufactured harmony we try to make a lot of times, right, just getting along, just trying to avoid conflict, you know, nothing critical here. Let’s just move on. Well, in a debrief, that’s not a great idea. And why? Because then you’re not going to get what I call the truth data out, right? Because if someone thinks that they saw an error or misstep, they don’t want to speak up because they don’t want to. I don’t want to accuse you of anything.

I don’t want to look like that. Especially a new person in an organization, right? What do they do? They just keep that in and say, well, it’s not Going to be a big deal. I’m just not going to say that, well, we’re never going to improve that way.

Correct.

We’re never going to get better. Right. If this stuff is not put out there. And so, you have to have what I call that respectful truth, which is that tone of accountability, which again, it’s not, it’s not investigation. We’re not trying to assign blame again, we’re getting away from the blame and train right, to learn and grow. But it’s about how we could have done better as a team. And so how do you establish that respectful truth? That’s why the first step in my model, I say set the environment and keep. Part of that is setting the tone. And it’s your job as the team leader of that debrief to set that tone. And just like the Blue Angels video I talked about, the first thing you have to do as the team leader is said, hey, here’s some things I could have done better today for the team. And you’ve got to do that part because if you don’t, everyone else is going to, you know, just keep all this stuff inside. Because after you do that, then you go around there and say, what, Eric? What. What could you. What do you have for me?

What could I have done better? And you try to give them to give you some, some inputs and feedback. Now what has that done that’s take down some of that barrier. Right now, people say, okay, we’re in a, you know, open, honest environment here. The team leader can speak up. Then I can definitely speak up and talk about my own shortcomings or maybe some things we saw that the team did other way, good way to do that is as you’re talking about your missteps, not saying, hey, Eric, you didn’t do this, versus saying, hey, we as a team, we missed this. And I think Eric would have done this if we would have done this for him or we would have provided this for him. So, you know, it also goes back to how you, you angle things with that respectful truth. But that’s the key part of that, is that artificial harmony is great, like I said, for cocktail parties, for happy hour, for, you know, just hanging out and small talk. But not great for debriefs, not great when we’re trying to improve. Right? Because that’s where you, that’s the whole purpose of improving, is finding where we had some shortcomings and where we can do better.

I’m really hearing about this is a consistent thing. We’re doing it Good or bad. We’re constantly trying to hold ourselves accountable. Not each other like you talked about blaming each other but holding each other accountable to the best level, understand system dimensions. What are the things that are occurring that maybe we aren’t aware having as a leader, the humility to. Humility, vulnerability to explore that I’m not perfect so that you have that respectful truth occurring across the board. But it’s really about embedding deep learning day in and day out from good and from bad.

Absolutely. Yeah, it is, it’s, it’s, that’s why I call it a debrief culture, right? Is because it’s this cycle of constant improvement. You know, no matter what, you know, process improvement model you adhere to, or people look at, almost all of them have some sort of at the end of it, you know, how do we improve, how do we improve? How do we go back and make this better? And that’s where the debrief serves to do that. And like I said, it really is a debrief culture and I call it a culture because of all things you just said. It takes leaders at the top that, that are vulnerable, takes leaders that are transparent that hold themselves accountable. You know, one of the things I talk about in my talks, this idea of mutual support, which is another key layer of this debrief culture and a building block of it. And mutual support is really deep level peer accountability, right? I mean it’s the kind of accountability that, that peers, we hold ourselves accountable and not of this, you know, this accountability thing. When I hear it, I always think of, I think we may have talked, talked about this on our first podcast, but you know, when I hear accountability, it’s always a negative connotation.

Like I always think of my, my, my assistant vice principal when I, in elementary school, you know, like the enforcer of the, when you got in trouble, you know, who you were going to go see. And so, but accountability I think gets that conn a lot of times, like it’s a bad word, like do this or else or you’re going to get fired or job action or whatever. And, and, and when I talk about it, I say I, I call it mutual support because that’s really what it is, right? Is, is peer level accountability is mutual support. And it’s not that I’m backing you up, Eric, because if I don’t, you know, something bad’s going to happen to me or job action, but it’s because I want you to look good when you’re leading a project. I want you to look good. I want the team to look good. You know why? Because I know you, I know you got a family, or I know what’s going on with you. And its that human connection going back to human factors again, right? And so that’s another thing you have to have with an organization I think to be a high performing team and ultimately to set up this debrief culture is that mutual support, you know, deep level camaraderie within a team with an organization making everybody human. 

And in this idea that we’re there to drive the team better. And that goes back to how leaders lead their teams, how they incentivize their teams, all kind of things, things again. But that’s a key part of that is that mutual support mindset. And like you said, I mean at the end of the day it’s how you do business, right? It’s leaders admitting their own shortcomings and showing where they could have done better. So then that, that filters down kind of, kind of through the teams and just on that, you know, I, because I hear this a lot of times like well Brandon, you know, I work in a team organization where not a lot of, you know, no name, no rank culture within my team or my leader really doesn’t. He’s not going to adhere to this. He’s not a, you know, big accountability person. So, what do I do? And I said Well influence where you can, right? I mean, because everyone is a leader in some sense. Everyone. And so, influence where, whether it’s just self-debriefs, whether it’s you and, and two or three other co-workers you can debrief on a project you’re doing, I mean influence where you can, right? 

And then that will slowly build hopefully from out to other people like that. And if there’s leaders you have that just aren’t going to embrace it, I mean there’s nothing you can do about that. But if you show, if you can do it within your own world, in your own little bubble, then you will see improvement.

And so last quick closing thought you talked about the debrief. There’s some organizations talk about after action reviews from the US Army. You also talk about the SEAL framework. Are there really differences between the different pieces? Are there things that we need to get that we can approach different ways or is really something unique about the debrief checklist?

Yeah, like you said, the deeper checklist, the model I came up with, I used a SEAL acronym, scald and that, that is a, that is a tick of the hat to I’ve worked with some other special operators before, so Navy SEALs and they use very similar type culture of what they do. High performing military teams, obviously, same reason, firepower, right? Because literally it can mean loss of life. They don’t improve in those type of environment. So, I do, I did come up with that acronym to kind of help. The S is for set the environment. Right. Just really quick, which is what we’ve talked about, you know, setting that tone of accountability. Why is that? First, because if you don’t do that, then you can forget about, you know, getting the rest of the brief working. The truth data, all the things we’ve talked about. Next is execution. So, what are you really looking at there? What was your objective? Right? Was it a clearly defined objective, first, and how did we do to measure up to that? You know, what were our results? And then from that, what is going to be what I call our debrief focus points.

Because, you know, when you look at a result, you could probably look at several things you want to talk about, but in the interest of time, you want to kind of narrow that down to maybe the two or three top areas we want to focus on. This is for major big projects, right, that you want to look at. And why don’t we have that, that even that step of execution? Because just like in the, if you watch the Blue Angels video, they’ll go through and watch the tape and just like I told you earlier in my keynote, I’ll go through and watch the tape. That’s the actual truth data, right? And that’s important because we all want to be on the same page of what actually happened before we start analyzing. Because I’m sure we’ve been in, you know, similar meetings where we’re talking about what happened and there’s a lot of assumptions and people are like, that’s not really what happened. So, we all got to be on the same page first before we start analyzing. Then we go into the analysis, which is the, the meat of that debrief, which is the a, which is really looking at, hey, what happened?

You know, what were some contributing human factors. Contributing factors, I call it, you know, whether it’s, you know, task saturation, overload, fatigue, lack of communication, we look at all those things. But what we’re really trying to get down to is that root cause or what I call that probable cause or that causal factor, sorry, which is say you, you know, something happened, and you really dig down. Yeah, but why did that happen? Why did that happen? So, you know, I use Example, the special, you know, special challenger, right? And so, I’ll ask people, why did that accident happen? They’re like, well, the O rings, you know, okay, that’s the active thing that you’re right. But let’s go back to why. And you keep asking why. I keep. And what it comes down to, you know, and this is what the investigation found too, is NASA didn’t have a solid go, no go process. I mean, at the end of the day, that was a root cause, plenty other contributing factors, right? And we talk about, you know, how they made those decisions, the influences they had, money, shuttle program. But the end of the day, they didn’t have a solid go, no go process that they used.

So, you want to dig down, like I said earlier, the five why is a great technique, but you’re just trying to get to that deep level why things happen finally. L is the lessons learned, which is after we know those root causes now, what are we going to change? You know, what are we going to get better? What are we going to implement within the organization processes, behaviors, patterns, you know, things we need to take back to leadership potentially? What are things we’re going to, we’re going to change, basically. And if you note in that checklist, one key piece I have there is you’ve got to assign, again, accountability to who’s going to oversee that change, right? And that’s a key piece of that. So, I gave you that overview. But to your question, yeah, I always tell people this all the time, look, you don’t have to take everything back, you know that I, that I tell you that I use and redo everything, but if you can just pull a few things out of here, if they can just pull out that, setting that tone of accountability piece out, you know, how you do that, I mean, that’s, that’s critical.

Or just how you analyze mishaps and really getting down to that deep level root cause or analyzing projects or tasks, I mean, if they can just take a few parts of it, that, that’s what I always say. That’s the key part of this. But having an understanding that at the backdrop of this is again going back to human factors, right, that go into that debrief, knowing that, hey, look, we know none of us made these mistakes or errors on purpose. None of us showed up here saying we’re going to do this, so let’s really get down to the deep level root cause. You know, what were the human factors at play? Maybe we didn’t have great communication. You know, like I said earlier, maybe we were mentally and physically fatigued. Maybe we’re running that revving the engine too high here. You know, there’s things that are going to come out of that that you’re going to, you’re going to really need to take step back and think about. So, I think that’s that all those pieces combined, it’s a great framework. But if you can just take a few pieces out of that, I think you’ll definitely see improvement both in how you run debriefs and then how you run your organization as well.

So, Brendan, thank you very much for coming back on the show. You’re a very engaging speaker. You talked last time about some of the elements of human factors. This time you went deeper on the debrief culture. I think it’s a hugely important piece. You also do keynotes, you do workshops. Somebody’s interested in, in tapping into some of your thinking around human factors, continuous learning debriefs. How can they get in touch with you?

Absolutely. Thanks for bringing that up, Eric. And again, thank you for having me on the show. It’s just a great time. I love talking this stuff, as you can tell, hopefully. But yeah, brandonwilliamsspeaker.com is my website. Go in there and you can reach out to me through there and find all kind of information as well. LinkedIn Brandon Williams, Speaker Just search that up and you should be able to find me. I’m also on Instagram, Facebook, leadership speaker pilot on those, if you search those and then [email protected] is my, is my email as well. So, feel free to reach out. And like I said, I love to give people, you know, the guides, free stuff all the time, things like that, because I think they’ll see how credibly valuable, useful it is when they do get it. So, thank you for bringing that up though.

Perfect.

Thank you for listening to The Safety Guru on C-suite Radio. Leave a legacy. Distinguish yourself from the past. Grow your success. Capture the hearts and minds of your teams. Elevate your safety. Like every successful athlete, top leaders continuously invest in their safety leadership with an expert coach to boost safety performance. Begin your journey at execsafetycoach.com. Come back in two weeks for the next episode with your host, Eric Michrowski. This podcast is powered by Propulo Consulting.

ABOUT THE GUEST

Brandon Williams is a highly sought-after speaker, airline pilot, and human factors professor with over two decades of experience leading teams in some of the world’s most dynamic, complex, and high-risk environments. A former U.S. Air Force Fighter Pilot, Lieutenant Colonel, and Safety Officer, Brandon brings a unique blend of military precision, safety expertise, and real-world leadership to organizations striving for excellence in high-reliability industries.

As a recognized expert in Human Factors and organizational safety, Brandon equips leaders with the strategies and tools to build High-Reliability Organizations (HROs) and High-Performance Teams across sectors including transportation, healthcare, energy, construction, and manufacturing. His powerful keynotes and training sessions are grounded in military aviation principles and safety science, offering actionable insights into system-level thinking, human error mitigation, and decision-making under pressure.

Brandon’s approach is both practical and transformative—he helps organizations understand the critical role of safety culture, Just Culture, and situational awareness in preventing incidents and enhancing team performance. Through compelling storytelling and proven methodologies, he empowers leaders to navigate uncertainty, manage complexity, and create resilient teams that thrive in high-stakes environments.

With his deep expertise and engaging presentation style, Brandon Williams is the go-to expert for organizations looking to elevate their safety leadership and operational excellence.

For more information: brandonwilliamsspeaker.com

Email: [email protected]

LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/brandon-williams-speaker/

RELATED EPISODE

STAY CONNECTED

The Safety Guru with Eric Michrowski

More Episodes: https://thesafetyculture.guru/

C-Suite Radio: https://c-suitenetwork.com/the-safety-guru/

Powered By Propulo Consulting: https://propulo.com/

Eric Michrowski: https://ericmichrowski.com

EXECUTIVE SAFETY COACHING

Like every successful athlete, top leaders continuously invest in their Safety Leadership with an expert coach to boost safety performance.

Safety Leadership coaching has been limited, expensive, and exclusive for too long.

As part of Propulo Consulting’s subscription-based executive membership, our coaching partnership is tailored for top business executives that are motivated to improve safety leadership and commitment.
Unlock your full potential with the only Executive Safety Coaching for Ops & HSE leaders available on the market.

Explore your journey with Executive Safety Coaching at https://www.execsafetycoach.com.
Executive Safety Coaching_Propulo